NEI’s Fukushima Voodoo Flex Philosophy For The whole Nation

They would be a lot better if they used all the monies from this to show us the real realities of plant life and the nuclear industry. 

For special NRC projects at each plant...where are your weaknesses and how can you communicate better to outsiders

  

Qualitative Assessment for Crediting Mitigating Strategies Equipment in Risk-Informed Decision Making

Developed by the NEI FLEX in Risk Informed Decision Making (FRIDM) Task Force  

PURPOSE

The purpose of this guidance document is to establish the considerations that should be assessed when evaluating the qualitative risk and safety benefit of Mitigating Strategies Equipment in Risk Informed Decision Making (RIDM). The licensee should determine that the use of a qualitative risk assessment is acceptable for the specific RIDM process being evaluated (e.g.

Shutdown Risk Assessment, Online Risk Management, Significance Determination Process (SDP), and Notice of Enforcement Discretion (NOED)). This guidance uses FLEX as an example case, however equipment of other mitigating strategies is applicable. This guidance identifies the key elements of a qualitative assessment of the benefits of mitigating strategies and the associated equipment. These strategies and equipment can be used to enhance and/or develop qualitative considerations for use in the risk-informed decision making process. This qualitative risk assessment can supplement or be used in lieu of quantitative risk assessment if applicable.

More flex crap. The object of the whole deal is to make it so complicated nobody can understand a thing they are saying including themselves.

Hey, when things go south nobody can blame anyone...

Good job everyone! 

Qualitative Assessment for Crediting Mitigating StrategiesEquipment in Risk-Informed Decision Making

Developed by the NEI FLEX in Risk Informed Decision Making (FRIDM) Task Force

1. PURPOSE

The purpose of this guidance document is to establish the considerations that should be assessed when evaluating the qualitative risk and safety benefit of Mitigating Strategies Equipment in Risk Informed Decision Making (RIDM). The licensee should determine that the use of a qualitative risk assessment is acceptable for the specific RIDM process being evaluated (e.g.

Shutdown Risk Assessment, Online Risk Management, Significance Determination Process (SDP), and Notice of Enforcement Discretion (NOED)). This guidance uses FLEX as an example case, however equipment of other mitigating strategies is applicable. This guidance identifies the key elements of a qualitative assessment of the benefits of mitigating strategies and the associated equipment. These strategies and equipment can be used to enhance and/or develop

qualitative considerations for use in the risk-informed decision making process. This qualitative risk assessment can supplement or be used in lieu of quantitative risk assessment if applicable.