That is more like it:
Fury also confessed to activating a fire alarm on June 19. The May 23 fire aboard the USS Miami caused $400 million in damage.
July 28: I be on vacation for a week beginning today and out of internet or cell phone range.
..."because his case was still pending trial and results of toxicology tests were not available... does that mean they got his blood and could do extensive blood testing for an assortment of drugs?
...I'd still say a big fish associated with the shipyard got him that job...if he was black I'd say it was a cousin's kid of Obama that got for the job. This guy is a good employee mixing all them drugs with huge doses of alcohol.
Suspect in USS Miami fire was arrested for alleged DWI
Posted July 27, 2012, at 12:45 p.m.
DOVER, N.H. — A man charged in the submarine fire at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard was arrested for allegedly driving while intoxicated last month.
The Portsmouth Herald said Friday that 24-year-old Casey James Fury was arrested for allegedly driving while intoxicated and striking a parked car while in the midst of an investigation into his ties to a fire on the nuclear submarine USS Miami.
Fury was arrested by Dover police on June 14 after a patrol officer observed him driving erratically. He was charged with DWI-second offense after an accident.
...I am just saying these Federal prosecutors are lazy, incompetent and unethical. The indictment doesn't including all the information that might weaken, indict or impeach the testimony of Fury. Obliviously there are unknown and unindicted co-conspirators with the false fire alarm and fires, the federal prosecutors are using selective evidence in the indictment, and there may be reason to believe Fury is a patsy.
.Isn't it strange the indictment doesn't admit we ask Fury if he pulled the false alarm on June 19 fire alarm and he denied he pulled it...
...Fury so called admitted to setting two fires in his indictment... the $700 million dollar fire and alcohol swipe fire on the fire proofed white wood. The indictment doesn't mention the false fire alarm and thus Fury did not pull it.
Meanwhile NCIS officials said quote, "there is no known connection between the fire on the U.S.S. Miami that occurred on May 23 and the one on June 16, but that possibility cannot be eliminated at this time."
"The NCIS is offering a $5,000 reward for any information leading to an arrest in connection with the fires. In a new development, the agency is also investigating a third incident that took place on June 19 when a fire alarm was pulled in the vicinity of the Miami.OK, so there are two fires and one anonymous fire alarms pulled at on or near the USS Miami since the big fire."
Who is the scumbag who pulled the illegal and false fire alarm on June 16 right near the sub? What kind of employees do they got there?
...This statement is so riddle with arrogance, age-ism and egoism...and mostly horrendous disrespectful classism with the middle class worker.
I might remind this fucking idiot Navy captain the unbelievable responsibilities the navy places with the 24 year olds running these subs...I'll bet you the crew manning the nuclear plant that day of the fire were all under 24 years of age. How about heroic military under 24 year olds over in Iraq and Afghanistan willing to give up their lives for our common good? He is trying to bail his navy captain's cronies that never gave a shit with what was happening in the shipyard.
The captain is another PR prop and he is will to throw our young adult population under the bus to divert you from what happened in this shipyard.
Right, he wants to hire our disconnected young adults as slaves for penny wages and low benefits...marginal humans for certain rudimentary jobs. They were just rudimentary monkeys. Probably penny wages and the low wage castaways of our society so guys like him make big bucks and kingly pensions. Right, he wants to hire the shiftless and disconnected class for pennies and zero respect for the dirty jobs they do. All the painters and sand blasters in the shipyards and throughout the USA are without "ethics", "low skilled" and only have "rudimentary jobs" so the Captain says.
He is a sophisticated Navy prop trying to divert accountability of the admirals, shipyard and high Navy department civilian officials.
Retired Navy Capt. Peter Bowman of Kittery, Maine, a former commander of the shipyard...
Bowman said it is possible the Navy will have to tighten some of its hiring procedures, but he noted the shipyard needs some relatively low-skilled, but trained individuals to do certain rudimentary jobs. Fury was a painter and sandblaster at the shipyard, according to court documents.
It seems to me that the younger generation (doesn't) display the rather rigorous ethics and common-sense standards that people from previous generations had. In other words, you didn't have to be told you don't light fires because you want to get off early to see your girlfriend," Bowman said
...So where is the proof, so he might have prescriptions and purchases...but who is to say he is really swallowing the pills. Only a blood sample would be proof to me and at the time of the incident...
“He explained that he was taking Celexa for anxiety and depression, Klonopin for anxiety, Ambien for sleep and Xertec (sic) for allergies,” according to a criminal compiaint filed against the painter, Casey Fury, of Port
Jun 18, 2012 message 20
I did this as logging...I have zero control of my message once I put it up topix. It is a auto logging device where I can't falsify the date or the message. You better be careful questioning me on the veracity of my own quotes cause I usually got it recorded in a trustworthy place and date stamped where I have absolutely no control of the message once submitted. You are right, in blogspot I can fiddle with anything in my blog...times and dates. I suspect they take a pictures of my blog on a daily bases and they can verify anything I say.
Said on this blog on June 21:
"Like i said with additional fires and false alarms, a nuclear submarine saboteur is playing with the Navy department investigators."
That reeks of a terrorist strike....
"He is being held at an undisclosed facility in the interim."
There is my famous May 25, 2012 quote:
"Rumors at the bars in Portsmouth say al Qaeda destroyed a United States fast attack nuclear submarine. That is the chatter on the internet.
"How about a new thrust with the Yemen al Queda...a Somali undocumented or falsified shipyard underwear incendiary bomber painter, cleaner or trash can emptier?
..And here is my statement about our news media...it is their humongous inability to analyze and make a separate evaluation of the world around them. It is as if they are just facts checkers without brains...they unthinking collect the PR facts from the businesses, corporations and government agencies without a care in the world of the larger purpose and meaning of their information. All I am is a repeater or amplifier of a signal without thinking...
They got three quarters of their brains partitioned off from the world...
...My analysis is from the opening moments of this fire, this fire to the navy uncovered a humongous festering wound in our submarines and maybe in our surface fleet. Our submarines aren't fire safe and they are a danger to all our sailors. From that ends all this soothing talk about vacuum clearer monsters, was the ends of not confronting the submarine general combustibility issues. A submarine can catch on complete fire faster than matches cascading into a whole book of matches flashing into fire!
That has been the aims of this cover-up until the nut case spit out his sins
...All right, I got more credibility with my terrorist claims than the Navy department and their NCIS has with the quickie three week investigation they first envisioned and the cockamamie vacuum ember story based on no evidence, the navy department warned the fleet and all shipyards about the dangerous exploding vacuum cleaners...
1) I do worry about the our military capabilities with investigating terror events in the USA...will they always blame terrorist strikes or saboteurs on the lazy story of dangerous vacuum cleaners?
2) The navy department was fundamentally dishonest with how they reported this to the community in the opening months...certainty and uncertainty gaming...what they really knew and didn't know. They made you feel good though.
3) The terrible material combustibility issues with this dangerous combat ship and human safety issues with this submarine. You are telling me all it takes is a Bic lighter and a small pile of alcohol soaked swipes on a officer's bed small pile of plain cleaning rags placed on a officers bed that leads to the destruction of a nuclear submarine? Does such a small fire lead to this? There is gross negligence of the Navy and it shipyard.
4) I can't believe their wasn't a ship's company (crew) roving fire watch 24/7 around the forward part of the ship who could catch this fire in the early stages!
I think the vacuum cleaner story based on the evidence at the time was a complete fraudulent story...a feel good nobody gets blamed cover-up story for public consumption
I was the first one in the USA who called this sabotage?
Federal authorities on Monday charged a Portsmouth, N.H., man with “willfully and maliciously” setting the devastating May 23 fire onboard the attack submarine Miami at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in Maine.
Casey James Fury was set to appear later in the day in U.S. District Court in Portland, Maine, on two counts related to the fire aboard the sub and the burning of nearby building materials, a court clerk said.
The fire raged out of control for hours, causing $400 million in damages. The Navy is now weighing whether to save the Los Angeles-class boat.
It's extraordinary that this didn't flip into a full fledged off the military system federal criminal investigation...
Originally published 6/21...
Imagine how strange it looks not having somebody admit they pulled the fire alarm or discovered why and how the small fire started....after the 1 billion dollar nuclear submarine fire?
July 20...
Links to USS Miami fire explored
Published 07/20/2012 12:00 AM
Investigators looking at subsequent small blaze, pulling of alarm nearby.
The Naval Criminal Investigative Service has not ruled out the possibility of a connection between the large blaze that severely damaged the USS Miami, a small fire that later broke out near the submarine and a fire alarm that was pulled.
The Naval Criminal Investigative Service has not ruled out the possibility of a connection between the large blaze that severely damaged the USS Miami, a small fire that later broke out near the submarine and a fire alarm that was pulled.
July 18:...If Iran is doing this to Israel in Bulgaria...they would destroy a billion dollar sub in the USA if they could?
UPDATED AT 6:04 p.m. ET: SOFIA, Bulgaria -- An explosion on a bus carrying Israeli tourists at an airport in Burgas killed at least six people and injured 32 others, Bulgarian authorities said. Bulgarian officials could not confirm the deadly blast was terror-related but Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu blamed Iran.
"Iran is responsible for the terror attack in Bulgaria, we will have a strong response against Iranian terror," said Netanyahu in a statement, according to Haaretz, an Israeli newspaper.
Update 6/21: Naval investigators are the best in the world. They are exposed to numerous and enormous problems and this make them highly seasoned. These guys have seen everything. The navy is a huge organization and just is a lot of big moving part. So why in the beginning they tell us it is a three week investigation and now into a 3 month investigation? Does it indicated they recently found something humongous.
Like i said with additional fires and false alarms, a nuclear submarine saboteur is playing with the Navy department investigators.
Originally published on 6/1/2012
By Deborah Mcdermott dmcdermott@seacoastonline.com
June 21, 2012 2:00 AM
KITTERY, Maine — U.S. Navy officials said Wednesday that it will be several more months before the investigations into the USS Miami submarine fire are complete.
The Judge Advocate General manual and the safety investigations will not be completed until late summer or early fall, said Gary Hildreth, public affairs officer at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard.
In the days after the May 23 fire, Navy officials said the investigations should take only two or three weeks to complete
Update:THE BOMB:
"1600 31 May: Word on the street is that the cause of the fire may have been something hot getting sucked up into a vacuum by a shipyard worker, which was then left on the boat at the end of the shift."
The word I am getting is it was a time delayed incendiary device...somebody brought in the vacuum cleaner incendiary bomb on the ship. Nobody in their right mind would think a fire like came from a metal covered 25 gallon industrial vacuum or a smaller home style vacuum that wouldn't have enough juice in it.
It had to be a accelerant or high test incendiary chemicals...with the incendiary bomb strategically placed to get the fire going big time.
They knew for the terrorist's incendiary bomb to destroy the sub, the whole deal would only work in a time when the ship was mostly abandoned. Dinner time.
They thoroughly knew the daily flow of work in a overhauling nuclear submarine.
And they planned the incendiary bomb chemicals and timing device would remain undetectable after a fire?
Well, to infer it was a terrorist event, but have no direct fingerprints on it...
I wonder if there was prior warning this was going to happen, but the government dismissed it?
Did Iran attack us?
OBama Order Sped Up Wave of Cyberattacks Against Iran
How many of these have you seen?
USS Iowa turret explosion
After most of the water was pumped out, the corpses in the turret were removed without noting or photographing their locations.
Morse directed a cleanup crew, supervised by Lieutenant Commander Bob Holman, to make Turret Two "look as normal as possible". Over the next day, the crew swept, cleaned, and painted the inside of the turret. Loose or damaged equipment was tossed into the ocean. No attempt was made to record the locations or conditions of damaged equipment in the turret.
"No one was preserving the evidence," said Brian R. Scanio, a fireman present at the scene. A team of Naval Investigative Service (NIS) investigators (the predecessor of the Naval Criminal Investigative Service or NCIS) stationed nearby on the aircraft carrier Coral Sea was told that their services in investigating Iowa's mishap were not needed.
"They got to paying off the on scene ship yard workers, throwing a military high security fence around this, warning the on scene sailors you will go to jail if you squeal. Rumors at the bars in Portsmouth say al Qaeda destroyed a United States fast attack nuclear submarine. That is the chatter on the internet.
How about a new thrust with the Yemen al Qaeda...a Somali undocumented or falsified shipyard underwear incendiary bomber bilge painter or trash can emptier?"
It could be a disgruntled shipyard worker or sailor who sabotage the ship. Does the navy has history of suspicious fires in the shipyard?
How about a strategy of the shipyard itself with approaching Navy cutbacks...expand the scope of work on this sub through sabotage?
The Navy is declaring the cover up has within a days or two of putting out the fire.
..."Snowe said McCoy told her the heat damage was such that "they may not even be able to determine the cause of the fire."
..."She said there's a "critical shortage" of submarines in service, a fact McCoy reiterated in discussions with her."
..."Snowe says it is believed to be the most serious fire ever at the shipyard, and possibly the worst on a Navy nuclear sub."
So why isn't there a press conference with the sailors and people in the sub when the fire started? Tell us what they seen...how the fire started and developed. Well, you know everyone got to get their story straight and this is terrorism related anyways?
You get it, light smoke, then the sub exploded in flames coming out the hatch.
Submarine Created Hellish Scene
Whitehouse said when he first arrived at the Miami, there was some light smoke coming out of the submarine and the ship's crew had been dealing with the fire. He said his firefighters located the fire in the front of the sub and on the middle deck of the submarine's three decks, but it quickly spread to the upper deck. At one point, flames were shooting out of the forward hatch.
It's a whole different beast,” Spinney said, adding despite the metal components, submarines have a lot of flammable material — like insulation and other items — which fueled the fire.
Mayor Eric Spear met Tuesday with Capt. Bryant Fuller, commander of Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, to discuss the submarine fire of May 23. Markel said he was told smoke from the sub was toxic.
And you know, with our extremely flammable inside hull sprayed on thermal and sound deadening foam and electrical cabling... the cornucopia of the extremely flammable environment we created for our heroic submariners through the profits oriented and funding starvation with building out our fleet of nuclear submarines. Our fleet operations of nuclear submarines would be decimated with prolong emergency related rework costing billions of dollars over the fire.
Navy Times June 1, 2012
"Unofficial reports indicate the fire burned at very high temperatures inside the ship.
"Temperature “readings on the hull during the fire were very high,” said one source with knowledge of the incident. “It was indicative of an incredible fire on the inside.”
"The intense fire could have buckled hull frames or weakened the pressure hull, and the cost of repairs could be prohibitive."
"If the submarine cannot be returned to active service, it would become the first submarine and the first nuclear ship lost through a U.S. shipyard accident."
"...Miami could become the first ship lost in a U.S. naval shipyard since the 19th century."
The Portsmouth Navel Shipyard has been implicated in two terrible accidents. The destruction of the fast attack submarine USS Thresher and now the USS Miami. Gets you to wondering what the reputation of this shipyard is to the Navy, what the sailors think of the quality of the Portsmouth shipyard ships.
And you know what, other ships beside submarines might be involved...
I don't believe a word of the Navy with their guess on their recent GW fire. You notice the GW was constructed around the same time as the USS Miami. They are both east coast ship builders but different corporations. I believe a motor or cable overheated and caught fire on the GW. Maybe a spontaneous combustion of a barrel of old rags. The general combustibility of the ship materials overwhelming the crew of the ship much like the USS Miami. The illegal cans of oil and butts was just was a product of a fire started somewhere else and caught up in the material negligence of the Navy. In both fires we are talking about approaching $1.5 billion dollar of lost taxpayers monies and we have no idea of the magnitude of other fires in Navy ships that might be related to ship general material fire combustibility.
As senator Snowe says, the Navy with the investigation on this aircraft carrier fire didn't find evidence how this fire started and the factors that made this a ship a combustion conflagration.
It is interesting, both fires took about the same time to put out.
It was only a guess from the Navy...
May 22, 2008
The USS George Washington, the fourth Navy ship to bear the name, was commissioned July 4, 1992. It is a Nimitz class nuclear-powered supercarrier with a crew of 3,000 but can carry up to 5,000.
"The smoking was happening in an unauthorized space and the evidence points to it probably was a lit cigarette that ignited the oil," said Capt. Scott Gureck, a spokesman for the U.S. Pacific Fleet. He said the investigation did not reveal who was smoking.
Flames were initially spotted near the auxiliary boiler room and air conditioning and refrigeration space in the rear of the ship. The safety of the ship's nuclear reactor was not threatened.
The Navy over the years reduced the fire incombustibility over the years on our submarines. I personally don't think they are combat ready and can't stand up to the rigors of the sea. The new electronics seem to be particularly combustible and toxic to a crew in a fire. Post Admiral Rickover career, I think the defense contractors and the shipyards conspired with each other to put a excessive national security shield over DOD systems with the politicians. I don't think the materials and ships were ever properly vetted for safe material combustibility limits for the duty in military ships. Considering the outcome of the fire on aircraft carrier USS George Washington and USS Miami, the submarines are a fire trap for our submariners and are unsafe. My fear is we got a host of ships other than submarines out in the fleet where a small fire could ignite, with the resulting fire conflagration caused by runaway secret reduction on material combustibility limits severely damaging the combat effectiveness of the ships. I fear we have a grave fleet wide national security threat because our Navy ships have become amazingly vulnerable to a fire contagion.
As far as the exhausted state of the Navy, a sailor's death on the USS Essex, and later the collision with the oil tanker USNS Yukon with the Essex.
“How far has the rot spread?’
With a looming hull swap, how much of an attitude that this-won’t-be-my-problem-much-longer existed amongst the crew?” he asked.
1) Considering the history of the US Navy gaming investigation, I request a professional out side the Navy investigation of this incident.
2) I request the Navy head of the shipyard be removed from his duties until the investigation is completed.
3) Request the NTSB be called in.
