VY is making a killing in the
market...what is the real reason they are shutting it down?
Brayton
Point power plant owner denies market manipulation
Globe
Staff April 28, 2014
The
private equity firm that owns Brayton Point denied that it is closing the
Somerset power plant to manipulate the New England electricity market and
increase its profits by tens of millions of dollars, calling allegations by
consumer advocates “baseless and uniformed.”
In a
14-page filing made Friday to federal regulators, Brayton Point LLC — which is
owned by a subsidiary of the equity firm Energy Capital Partners of Short
Hills, N.J. — defended Brayton Point’s planned retirement in 2017. The company
said it made the decision after
determining that continuing to operate the 53-year-old coal-fired plant in the
face of cheap natural gas prices and increasing environmental regulations
“would result in operating risks and losses.”
“Brayton Point made an economically rational
decision and believes that anyone in such a position would have done the same,”
Brayton Point LLC said in its filing to the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission.
Several
groups, led by the national consumer advocacy organization Public Citizen, have asked the FERC investigate
Energy Capital Partners. They allege the firm decided to retire Brayton to push
up payments to power generator by ISO New England, the grid operator,
benefitting five other plants owned by Energy Capital Partners that sell into
the New England market.
ISO
New England pays power generator to commit to providing energy in future years
so that the region has enough electricity to meet demand. ISO New England
recently paid generators an estimated $1.4 billion for promising to provide
electricity starting in mid-2017, the time at which Brayton Point is expected
to shutter.
As a
result, Public Citizen and others say, Energy Capital Partners reaped an extra
$74 million for its other plants, in Dighton and Springfield, Dayville and
Milford, Conn., and Albany, N.Y
Energy
Capital Partners bought Brayton Point and two other power plants from their
previous owner, Dominion, in 2013 for $472 million. Several weeks after closing
the deal, the equity firm announced that it would retire the Somerset facility.
“We
believe there was clear intent here of acquiring Brayton to manipulate the
market,” said Tyson Slocum, director for Public Citizen’s energy program.
““They are telling us that five weeks after closing on a [multi-million dollar]
acquisition that included three power plants, of which Brayton Point was one,
they say, ‘Geez, we found out it’s not economical to run?’ That story on its
face is laughable.”
In its
filing, the owner of Brayton Point said the accusations leveled against it were
made because certain parties are “unhappy with the level of clearing prices”
recently paid by ISO New England to ensure power in 2017. Those prices were
much higher than the prices ISO New England paid to ensure power in 2016.
“The
Commission should refuse to entertain baseless allegations of market
manipulation,” the firm wrote.
Representatives
of ISO New England have declined to comment on the FERC case. In a press
release February, ISO New England attributed the higher prices it paid were due
to a shortfall of generating capacity needed for 2017.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission also
has declined to comment on the case.
No comments:
Post a Comment