Wednesday, May 08, 2013

Unprecedented Bellows Failure In A Pilgrim SRV

Lets see, so Pilgrim had a bellows failure on March 5, 2013, in addition to what caused all the leaks...

They reported it on May 3, 2013.

They safety reported it when Pilgrim was shutdown…just like the LER from Jan discussing the shutdown when in the refueling outage after. See, they are protecting Pilgrim with the timing of the release…making sure no interveners could request to shutdown…

You get it, the standard of safety for Target Rock and Entergy is they have to prove a not transparent component or internal is not safe.

They are not required to prove the material has the required quality for its safety requirements.

So we had some defect in these new valves that caused two plant required shutdowns, some eight leak. In addition to that, we have another defect in the bellows that would have prevented the valve’s automatic relief capability. And they don’t know the mechanism of the failure and the magnitude of it.

Right, that pilot valve was in the plant and then was heading back to the plant after testing…and there was no expectation the bellow corrosion would have been discovered in a regular turnaround.

I will give them the benefit of doubt, got to look at my timeline…it came from the Nemo Nor'easter when they replaced leaking

Holy freaken shit!

My April 2, 2013 petition 
MR. MULLIGAN: “I think that in the beginning, you were -- the NRC. I won't get personal, but the NRC was really rude to me and disruptive because they didn't know all the other ones went (other 2.206's of mine). This was off normal as far as how it was-- you disrupted me and got me off my thought train and stuff. And I interpreted it as being rude and disrespectful and part of a coverup. Thank you.”

March 3, 2013

Part 21 (PAR)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Operations Center Event Report

Event# 48996

Rep Org: CURTISS WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL CO. Notification Date / Time:

Emergency Class: NON EMERGENCY ERIC DUNCAN R3DO

10 CFR Section: 21.21 (a)(2) INTERIM EVAL OF DEVIATION

INTERIM PART 21 REPORT OF POTENTIAL DEFECT IN A RELIEF VALVE BELLOWS

The following was excerpted from a fax:

(ii) Identification of the basic component supplied for such facility or such activity within the United States which may fail to comply or contains a potential defect.

Target Rock P/N: 303480-1, Bellows, Manufactured by Target Rock.

(iii) Identification of the firm supplying the basic component which fails to comply or contains a defect. Target Rock, Business Unit of Curtiss-Wright Flow Control Corporation

(iv) Nature of the defect or failure to comply and the safety hazard which is created or could be created by such defect or failure to comply.

During as-found steam testing on March 5, 2013 of a Pilgrim Main Steam Safety Relief Valve (MS-SRV) (TR Model 09J-001, valve assembly SIN 5, pilot assembly S/N 23, bellows PIN 303480-1 SIN 607) a loud pop was heard and as-found testing was secured. Subsequently, the pilot assembly was removed from the valve assembly and
subjected to a leak test and would not hold pressure. The pilot assembly was disassembled and a visual inspection of the PIN 303480-1 bellows convolutions revealed a through wall failure in one of the convolutions. It is noted the steam testing was performed at an offsite test facility and the valve did not fail installed in the plant.

The bellows acts as a pressure sensor responsible for initiating the opening of the MS-SRV at set pressure. Failure of the bellows does not directly impact the integrity of the Reactor Coolant System (RCS) pressure boundary, which is maintained by the bonnet assembly that surrounds it, but does impair the ability of the MS-SRV to provide over-pressure protection of the RCS. This technology has an extensive history of reliability in nuclear power systems and has been used in Commercial Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) since the 1970s. This is the first reported incident regarding a thru wall bellows failure.

Target Rock initiated a comprehensive root cause evaluation pursuing several areas of investigation. In parallel, Entergy is conducting an independent investigation and we are cooperating with them. A complete review of our paperwork confirms all manufacturing procedures and processes were performed in accordance with all specified requirements. This includes:

- Raw material analysis
- Dimensional inspections
- Cleaning
- Heat Treatment
- Manufacturing processes
- Testing
- Review of design stresses

Preliminary metallurgical analysis of the failed bellows indicates cracks forming in an inter-granular manner as would be expected from Inter Granular Stress Corrosion Cracks (IGSCC) originating at pit like location on the interior pressurized surface. The source of this cracking is the focus of on going investigations. Target Rock has also visually inspected two other bellows of the same part number, one manufactured from the same material lot and another manufactured from an earlier material lot. Both of these bellows were installed in valves steam tested at Target Rock. One of these valves bellows was also full flow tested at Wyle Labs. Neither of these additional bellows contained pit-like locations and may indicate this potential failure mechanism is an isolated incident. However, to date, neither Target Rock nor Pilgrim can draw final conclusions with the information collected and analyzed.

The mode of failure has not been determined; however, in order to address the potential for a common mode failure, Target Rock is continuing metallurgical testing of the failed bellows and the two other bellows with the same part number. Based on these results, it is likely we will need to evaluate bellows that have been installed in other NPP as they become available.

(v) The date on which the information of such defect or failure to comply was obtained.
The as-found steam test and identification of the potential defect occurred on March 5,
2013.

(vi) In the case of a basic component which contains a defect or fails to comply, the number and location of these components in use at, supplied for, being supplied for, or may be supplied for, manufactured, or being manufactured for one or more facilities or activities subject to the regulations in this part.

The following plants are running with bellows P/N 303480-1 installed: Limerick 1 & 2, Pilgrim, and J.A. Fitzpatrick.

(vii) The corrective action which has been, is being, or will be taken; the name of the individual or organization responsible for the action; and the length of time that has been or will be taken to complete the action.

The following plants are running with bellows P/N 303480-1 installed:
Limerick:  
28 valves installed,  3-Stage MS-SRVs, Units 1 and 2, with bellows installed 1999 
 Pilgrim:   
4 valves installed, 3-Stage MS-SRVs, with bellows installed in 2011  
Fitzpatrick: 
 3 valves installed, 3-Stage MS-SRVs, with bellows installed 2011
(vii) The corrective action which has been, is being, or will be taken; the name of the individual or organization responsible for the action; and the length of time that has been or will be taken to complete the action.

The root cause of the potential defect is not yet known as of the date of this report. Therefore, no specific corrective actions have been initiated. Target Rock Corrective Action Request CAR 13-013 will document the corrective actions when they are determined. This determination will be based on further mechanical and material evaluations. TR anticipates completing these evaluations within 45 days; however, in the event the evaluations are not completed, TR will forward another interim report within 45 days.

 (viii) Any advice related to the defect or failure to comply about the facility, activity, or basic component that has been, is being, or will be given to purchasers or licensees.

Target Rock will recommend that the end user perform a detailed visual inspection of the interior convolutions of installed bellows P/N 303480-1 at the next opportunity to determine if any areas of pitting or cracking exist on the interior wails of the bellows. This is a difficult inspection to perform due to the following: internal geometry of the convolutions, a trained inspector is required and specific inspection technology is needed to yield reliable results, (ix) In the case of an early site permit, the entities to whom an early site permit was transferred.

No comments: