Saturday, June 21, 2014

The Palisades PCP Impeller Continues!


June 26:
According the NRC tonight Entergy replaced the C PCP pump with a new one this outage and a malfunctioning PCP seal on the new C pump caused the most recent shutdown.
It was a new seal!! 
June 22: 
Hmm, the Cooper plant secretly just came down for a recirc pump seal job a week or so ago. Had to pry it out of them.  One is PWR and the other is a BWR. It is suspicious though as hell…are they related?
Is there some deep management philosophy thing going on...like just let it run till it fails. Did they take a shutdown with anomalies readings on the seal…just start up without replacing the seal because they didn’t have enough time?  
See bottom update...








+++The Below is the first entry setting this up and then Reposted from 6/20...everything else was added after one day later.

Junk and obsolete "primary coolant pumps" and Entergy has a habit of intentionally running safety equipment until failure. We have no idea if the proper maintenance was taken on these seals...

Maybe they will break another impeller blade on the way down and up...they will be running these pumps outside their design margins during the shutdown and start-up. Everyone cross their fingers!

June 26: The severely out of balanced  impeller since 2011 damaged the C pump...this cause them to replace the whole unit this spring. The brand new pump and its brand new seals failed upon start-up...this is what caused their new shutdown.  
"2014: The licensee removed the impeller from PCP-C and replaced it with a newly manufactured impeller. The removed impeller had missing portions in two impeller vanes." 
Obviously the massive vibrations with the severely out of balance impeller shortened the life of the seals? You think Entergy would be smart enough to replace the seals at the same time...I doubt it.
Now when did they come out of their recent outage...March 16.

Congratulation Entergy on that record run of 97 days!  
(June 22: Pretty cool ha, sending signals...)
COVERT TOWNSHIP, MI – Palisades Nuclear Power Plant was removed from service at 11:30 p.m. Friday, (June 20).
 You catch that...I put this up on the internet at 4 pm yesterday:)
That is being done to conduct a "planned maintenance outage" to replace a primary coolant pump seal, says Lindsay Rose, spokeswoman for Entergy Corp., which owns Palisades.
She said the outage will be brief but she would not provide an estimate of how long, saying that is not information the company makes available to the public.
"This is not an emergency situation at all," Rose said. "We are just shutting down to replace this now so we can have more reliable operations in July and August, through the summer, when energy demand is higher."
She said the seal helps maintain pressure inside one of four primary coolant pumps at the plant.
"There are primary pumps that push water from steam generators to our reactor vessel," Rose said. "We have four of them. We are replacing the seal in one of the pumps."
She said the seal is being replaced "because we've been monitoring the seals and we noticed one of the seal's layers – each has four layers – and we've noticed one of the layers of the one seal wasn't performing the way it should."
The pumps work together to circulate water and keep the vessel cool.
Early this month, Allison M. Macfarlane, chairwoman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and U.S. Rep. Fred Upton, R-St. Joseph, toured the plant to see safety upgrades. They said the plant was safe but Macfarlane acknowledged that there were concerns about a "chilled work environment" in Palisades' security department.
In a poll, workers said they believed they could not raise safety issues without facing retaliation.
Macfarlane said there was no final word on what the NRC would do to address those concerns, "but it's something we look at very seriously."
These reports are so selective and incomplete…no mention in the 2012 inspection report and I believe the newest IR don't mention "out of licensing" issue began in 2002. I don’t trust these guys to give us the unvarnished truth on these events.
I can’t find the non sighted violation so far... 

In further consultation with industry specialists over the next several months, the licensee reviewed previous site and industry operating experience regarding PCP impeller issues and assessed the manner in which the Palisades pumps were operated. The research concluded that the cause of the failures is fatigue-related effects from the operation of the pumps in conditions beyond the maximum flow rates and below the minimum net positive suction head recommendations as described in the UFSAR and other design documentation.
In response to the October 2011 event and subsequent research conducted to better understand the phenomena affecting the PCPs, the licensee has instituted a monitoring plan, changed the preferred sequence for starting/stopping PCPs during startups and shutdowns, and has corrective actions to explore further procedure changes regarding operation of the PCPs and the resultant impact on other aspects of plant operation. 
 
This is a brand new inspection report.

I just can't understand this, yet this continuation of allowing the operating the PCP outside the design operating critera in 2002 lead to the distruction of many PCP impellers.
I can't find any non sited violation of the PCP pumps in 2002...somebody is smoking dope in the NRC. The idiot must be must be talking about 2012.  
June 20:
For example, the licensee received a non-cited violation in 2002 for the failure to operate the primary coolant pumps in accordance with their design operating criteria. The inspectors verified that the licensee’s evaluations for the issue were comprehensive and the corrective actions completed and planned were appropriate and timely, commensurate with their safety significance.
 
This is the first time I’d seen this…
Was this in the recent inspection (foreign material) about this?








June 21@ 6:30pm
>>>>Can you even imagine how many well educated NRC officials looked over IR 2014007 for errors? So I looked in the back section of the "listed of documents" they inspected. They had no 2002 documents listed in this inspection report. This below is what they looked at.

We are lucky these guys aren't reactor operators.The NRC looked over IR 2012003 and recertified there was no any operational safety issues with repeatedly spewing RCP impeller blades all in the coolant over the decades. But we could never see the secret internal document...how do we know the operational determination was thorough?<<<<    
CR-PLP-2012-02044 Operation of Primary Coolant Pumps with Inadequate Net Positive Suction Head April 2, 2012

Firing NRC Commissioner George Apostolakis by June 30?


Originally posted on 6/20

Just think about this with those weak kneed and cowardly democrats...it was only the rabid dog right wing extremist in the senate who stood up for the democrat's choice Apostolakis.  
Me June 11: Apostolakis must have asked the republicans for a favor, to bring it up during the meeting. The Republicans in the senate subcommittee meeting were apoplectic he wasn’t yet renominated to the NRC by Obama…they thought it disrespectful he hasn’t been notified he was going to continue to be a NRC commissioner.
A excellent choice would be William Corcoran...
My plain vanilla political choice would be Dave Lochbaum. He has been kind of kindly to the industry of late and I think he has been angling for the commissioner’s job. My best choice though would be Arnie Guntersen because he’s got such a big chip on his shoulder…he would represent the anti-nuclear establishment the best. He would take the contrary position more than Dave and he would be in all out fight against the industry until death!  He would shake them up the most, even if the commissioner was always voting 4 to 1 against him. Though Lockbaum has invaluable insider NRC experiences as he was once an employee. Bob Meyer would also be a great choice as in PROS…
Heaven would be having both commissioner Lochbaum and Guntersen!!!
My secondary choices would be having politician, a union official or a neutral nuclear industry CEO or VP. To die for, would be getting somebody in there who actually once had or has a reactor license.
The best “wild man” choice of all time would be me!!!! of course!!!! Note: I was recently criminally convicted for repairing a dilapidated and loose boards on a 1920's bridge walkway, i narrowly escaped a felony!!!
"According to people in the nuclear-energy industry"...basically this is acknowledgement nobody has has any sway in the nomination process except the nuclear industry insiders.

We don't even get a token they are so insecure...

If I am nominated :) my highest priority would be that I am a tool for and of transparency!!!

Originally posted 6/11...

Basically none of these guys has any direct nuclear plant insider experience and certainly no licence operator experience....it will take them three years to come up to speed.

Do they need 60 votes or just a majority which are democrats. I be researching these guys.

Jeff Baron, an aide to retiring Rep. Henry Waxman
Can't find much on Jeff yet...

Stephen Burns, a former general counsel to the NRC:
Is this a insider nuclear industry joke, Magwood is heading to the OECD Nuclear Energy (NEA) Agency and Stephen Burns is coming out of th the same agency. Oh, Burns is the chief legal counsel and Magwood is going to be the general.
Stephen G. Burns appointed Head of Legal Affairs at the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

The OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) is pleased to announce that Mr. Stephen G. Burns has been appointed Head of Legal Affairs. Mr. Burns will provide legal opinions and secretariat services to the Nuclear Law Committee, advise NEA management on all legal aspects of the Agency’s operations, assist member countries in the establishment of international joint projects and contribute to the Agency's nuclear law information and education programmes. He will also provide legal assistance to the Contracting Parties to the Paris Convention on Third Party Liability in the field of nuclear energy and the Brussels Convention Supplementary to the Paris Convention.
Mr. Burns was appointed General Counsel of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in May 2009 after serving as the NRC’s Deputy General Counsel since 1998. As General Counsel, he was responsible for legal advice and representation for the NRC. Mr. Burns joined the NRC as an attorney in 1978 and has worked on a number of significant issues involving nuclear safety and regulation. He received the NRC Distinguished Service Award in 2001 and the Presidential Meritorious Executive Rank Award in 1998 and 2008. Mr. Burns served as a member of the US delegation to the NEA Nuclear Law Committee. He has also been a lecturer
Global Studies Law Review 
GLOBAL NUCLEAR ENERGY LAW AND
REGULATION SYMPOSIUM 
THE FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI ACCIDENT:
THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY RESPONDS
 
STEPHEN G. BURNS 
I read this report...I know he is just representing his agency...but I don't trust him. I wouldn't vote for him with what I'd seen.
(Updated June 21) My assessment of these two...it is a typical weak kneed democrat and Obama ploy. They try to neutralized their opportunity by choosing one to please the democrats and the other to please the republicans. The NRC lawyer got to be a Republican.
If it was a republican president extremist with two republican slots open, he wouldn't blink putting in their two right wing nuclear industry extremist.
The rather moderate right wing nuclear industry extremist of the chairman and these next two democrats nominees would have the majority voting block for the next 4 of 5 years.  
Remember Obama set up Jaczko to fail in his "cap and trade" deal in the beginning of his presidency. He picked pro nuclear commissioners to appease the nuclear utilities...that is where "rat bastard Magwood" came from.
Just saying, if this was the rabid mad dog treabagger Republicans, they would take no prisoner. They would hire without a conscience two nuclear industry extremist. But you get it, when the Republican extremist take the presidency, generally their political choices are highly partisan. While when the weak kneed democrats take power, there political choices become most neutral or slightly right wing. You go though a few political cycles and this game mostly screws the democrats who voted for their democrat party...they are always selling out the democratic party.
You can see this coming from a million miles away, Obama and the Democrats will throw the House a rabid mad dog Republicans extremist a commissioner gift. We will nominate a rabid Republican extremist commissioner in the hopes of moderating the house mad dog republicans. The House will assume it is a sign of weakness, just like Putin...then the nuclear industry will hold the commissioner voting majority for the foreseeable future and they will vote like Obama never gave them the majority, you fool. Thank you Mr Obama...  
Got this right since March 2013

Nuclear Regulator to Leave Federal Agency
Typically political Friday night and weekend dump?
WSJ: White House Decides Not to Renominate Apostolakis as an NRC Commissioner
WASHINGTON—One of the five members of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission will leave the agency after the White House decided not to renominate him for a second term.
George Apostolakis, first nominated to the commission by President Barack Obama in 2010, will leave the NRC on June 30 when his term ends, according to agency spokesman Eliot Brenner.
A White House spokesman declined to comment on why the administration opted not to renominate Mr. Apostolakis, who has publicly stated he would like to continue as a commissioner. He was given notice this week from the White House, according to a person familiar with the matter.
In a statement issued Friday, Mr. Apostolakis thanked Mr. Obama for giving him the opportunity to serve and noted the work he had done while on the commission, including work related to the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear-power plant meltdown caused by a tsunami following a major earthquake in Japan.
"During this demanding period, the NRC staff continued to carry out our mission with expertise and professionalism," Mr. Apostolakis said.
Another NRC commissioner nominated by Mr. Obama in 2010, William Magwood IV, said earlier this year that he had accepted the position of director general of the Paris-based Nuclear Energy Agency. Mr. Brenner said Mr. Magwood would leave the NRC by late summer, and the NEA said he would begin Sept. 1.
Messrs. Apostolakis and Magwood are both Democrats, and the White House hasn't announced who Mr. Obama intends to nominate to fill their seats. The nominees will require Senate confirmation.
According to people in the nuclear-energy industry, the White House is considering nominating Jeff Baron, an aide to retiring Rep. Henry Waxman (D., Calif.), who is the top Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and Stephen Burns, a former general counsel to the NRC.
Platts:
 A nuclear industry source said Thursday that Jeff Baron, a Democratic congressional staffer, and Stephen Burns, former NRC general counsel, are being "vetted" as possible nominees for Apostolakis' seat.

Baron is staff director for energy and the environment with the House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee. Burns retired from NRC in March 2012 and is currently head of the legal affairs section in the secretariat at OECD's Nuclear Energy Agency.

Senator David Vitter of Louisiana, the senior Republican member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, which oversees NRC, said during a committee hearing June 4 that he was "concerned with the lack of communication" with the Senate from the White House and NRC on potential nominees to the agency.

Vitter said keeping those positions filled "must remain a priority," and he urged the administration "to act quickly so the commission can continue its important work without interruption or distraction."

Both Apostolakis and Magwood are Democrats, as is NRC Chairwoman Allison Macfarlane. Commissioners William Ostendorff and Kristine Svinicki are Republicans. The Atomic Energy Act specifies that no more than three commissioners can be from the same political party, so the new appointees are likely to be Democrats.

The commission has previously conducted business with two commissioner slots vacant.
June 11:
What are the Cantor ramifications for the NRC commissioner nominations and President Obama?
WSJ: Eric Cantor Loses to Tea Party's David Brat in Virginia Primary

Will the Republicans be willing to make a deal or will they be more ideologically strident on the NRC. Will the ideologues be controversial adverse...just want to make a deal to shut everyone one up.  
I think this will drive the House and Senate Republican nuclear ideologues more to the right...hate Obama even more. Will the Senate Committee on the Environment and Public works have more open warfare or less?
Will the House yank funding from the NRC as a show of force? 
Originally posted on 6/6

What is his role in nominating the NRC commission?
 
 
As majority leader of the Senate, the Nevada Democrat is one of the most powerful people in Washington. Over the past year, he has on two occasions scotched the White House's pick of leader for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, a low-profile agency that oversees the nation's electric grid, and he has successfully pushed for other preferred candidates.
His efforts will be tested as soon as this week when the Senate's energy committee votes on whether to confirm Norman Bay as FERC chairman and Cheryl LaFleur as a commissioner. Mr. Bay is a Reid-backed candidate. The senator blocked Ms. LaFleur from getting the top job, and he is blunt about his interest in shaping FERC.
"Oh really? No kidding," Mr. Reid said. "Wow, that is amazing—that a majority leader who has a responsibility of selecting people would have some opinion as to who he suggests to the White House."
Mr. Reid's interest stems from his expressed intent to develop his state's renewable-energy industry. In 2013, Nevada ranked second in the nation for geothermal energy production and third for solar production, and 18% of its total electricity generation came from renewable, above the national average of 13%.
Nevada and the West in general, however, need more power lines to deliver renewable energy to customers. While FERC, which can have as many as five members, doesn't generally approve construction of interstate power lines, it does approve wholesale electric transmission sales and tariffs, which influence where power companies decide to build transmission lines.
Mr. Reid's attentions have roiled an agency that, like other federal regulatory bodies, is supposed to be independent from Congress and the executive branch.
"The uncertainty over the makeup of the commission has created a level of dysfunction I have not seen in my five years on the commission," said John Norris, an Obama commission appointee who also was boxed out of the chairmanship by Mr. Reid, according to people involved in the process. "The dysfunction of the Senate seems to be spilling over to those agencies Sen. Reid wants to have a controlling hand on."
A spokeswoman for Ms. LaFleur declined to comment. A White House spokesman declined to address specific interactions with Mr. Reid.
"We, of course, work closely with Sen. Reid and other members of the Senate to nominate and confirm the best, most qualified candidate for open positions across the government," said White House spokesman Matt Lehrich. "When it comes to FERC, the president chose Norman Bay because he is a proven leader and dedicated public servant with expertise in the energy markets, a tough, evenhanded approach to enforcing the law, and a history of bipartisan support."
Mr. Norris was the first potential nominee for chairman to run into Mr. Reid. According to the people involved in the nominations process, the lawmaker insisted the White House not nominate Mr. Norris as chairman, in part because he had taken a position in a previous job that Mr. Reid considered too favorable to coal.
"It is a rare instance," said one former Obama administration official. "Usually the White House and Sen. Reid work together pretty well. This was a bit of hard ball."
Mr. Reid wanted instead someone from a Western state similar to Nevada, according to people familiar the matter. (Mr. Norris is an Iowan).
Last July, the White House nominated former Colorado Public Utilities Commission Chairman Ron Binz as chairman. A few months later, Mr. Binz withdrew his nomination because of opposition from Republicans and some Democrats for comments he made about supporting renewable energy over fossil fuels.
Mr. Reid also didn't take to Ms. LaFleur as chairman, contending she wouldn't adequately protect consumers from electricity-market manipulation or support building transmission lines for renewable energy. "I don't want her as chair," Mr. Reid said during a recent interview in his Washington office.
Ms. LaFleur has been acting chairman since Jon Wellinghoff, a Nevadan close to Mr. Reid, retired in late 2013. "She has done some stuff to do away with some of Wellinghoff's stuff," Mr. Reid said.
Mr. Bay is up for a vote as FERC chairman by the Senate committee as soon as Thursday, after which the full Senate would vote. Mr. Reid supports him in large part because he hails from a Western state, New Mexico. He also draws bipartisan support.
It isn't rare for lawmakers to work to shape regulatory agencies, but observers said Mr. Reid's direct line to the White House allows him to fight for who he wants on FERC behind the scenes. The senator's allies also say Washington lawmakers routinely seek to benefit the states they represent.
"You're crazy not to use it to help your constituents back home," said Eric Washburn, a principal at lobbying firm Bracewell & Giuliani who worked on energy and environment issues for Democratic senators, including Mr. Reid, for 10 years. "People may argue that is unfair, but it is the seniority system and it is what it is."
Mr. Reid's vision for FERC is broadly aimed at securing investment in renewable energy and transmission lines in the West.
He helped secure federal approval for a major renewable-energy power line in Nevada, according to former Reid aides, and supported the sale of Las Vegas-based utility NV Energy to a unit of
FERC under Mr. Wellinghoff advanced policies that in the long run help boost Nevada's renewable energy, according to Mr. Reid and his aides. One regulation that FERC approved in 2011 under Mr. Wellinghoff requires states to coordinate on transmission planning, such as new power lines, which utility experts say would help move renewable energy more easily, especially throughout the West.
 
Wellinghoff said. "And he supports Nevada becoming an exporter of these resources."

Is the NRC's great revolution beginning???
The Honorable George Apostolakis was sworn in as a Commissioner of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) on April 23, 2010, for a term ending on June 30, 2014.
U.S. Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) on June 4 urged the Obama administration to act soon to avoid a vacancy on the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). 
Barrasso, a member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, said during a committee hearing on NRC that Commissioner George Apostolakis is currently scheduled to see his term expire June 30.
So far the Obama administration has neither re-nominated Apostolakis for a new term nor nominated someone else to replace Apostolakis on the five-member panel. 
While Barrasso did not mention it, NRC will already be facing at least one vacancy in the near future. Commissioner William Magwood IV announced earlier this year that he will resign from the commission to become director general of the Paris-based Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) Nuclear Energy Agency. 
Magwood's current term was not scheduled to expire until June 30, 2015.
Then Magwood is quiting by summer's end...fired upwards into the better position.

Usually what is going on, it is just horse trading between the politicians. He will eventually get renominated after the deal is set.

America’s faith in media at all-time low

Because they starve their news room staffs and predominantly only serve the business and corporate class…as our political class who is also increasingly who is increasingly serving the elites, business and corporate class….
Americans now trust television and print media about as much as they do the Internet, which is to say, not very much.
The latest edition of a Gallup poll that tracks confidence in media follows a decades-long trend that shows a declining faith in television and print news. The percentage of Americans that have "a great deal" or "quite a lot" of confidence in the three media formats now hover around one-fifth.
Twenty-two percent of respondents trust newspapers, 19 percent trust web-based news sites, and 18 percent say they trust TV. All three of those numbers are within the polls 4-point margin of error.

Faith in print media is down 29 points since its 1979 peak. TV peaked in 1993 with a 46 percent confidence rating. Oddly, Gallup hadn’t asked the question about the Internet since 1999, but the difference (from 21 percent then to 19 percent now) is statistically negligible.

While the numbers across all three venues are dreary, the trend lines are important. With the decline in faith comes a decline in traditional media’s ability to influence public opinion and political debate. If the trends continue (and it is hard to find a reason why they won’t), the Web would soon be the most influential media component in the national conversation.

Another interesting takeaway from this survey: Self-identified political conservatives trust in newspapers has tied its all-time low — 15 percent — while confidence among self-identified liberals, though still down over the last 10 years, is more than double that of conservatives: 34 percent.

Gallup does not say whether those that distrust newspapers actually read them.

There is, however, almost no split between liberals and conservatives when it comes to television — disdain for TV news spans the ideological divide.
You can trust us on that one

The London Array Wind Farm @ $221 MWh


But you get it, at $221MWh, it has a capacity factor of 40% and it has a astonishing short operating life time of  24 years for "Phase 1 of London Array cost £1.9bn to build, has a 630MW capacity and is expected to produce around 2,200,000MWh of electricity a year".

This is call insanity!!!

The UCS talks about the new" Vogtle expansion, with mid-range levelized costs (per MWh) of $82, $83, and $90, respectively".

It is $35MWh in New England on June 22  and on a Saturday, and it is cool outside. It been $40 to $60 most of this month…but our high market price is leverage by the threat of a natural gas shortage and not enough installed capacity. We are in severe electricity crisis…well, a severe profit crisis because the utilities can’t find a bank big enough to hold all their money.   
Remember energy diversity and the all-of-the-above philosophy means the politicians are out to screw you and sabotage our jobs and income…this basically means the ginned up highest priced source of electricity sets the price of all the lower priced electricity. This allows all the sources of energy to collude against us all and wreck our political system with all their dirty money…gang up on us together.     
I am certain they could build a safe nuclear plant at $221MWh but it would drive our economy back to the stone age.
The London Array is the world’s largest offshore wind farm and began operation earlier this year. Located in the outer Thames Estuary, the 100km2 installation of 175 3.6MW turbines has a combined generating capacity of 630MW – and that’s just phase 1.

We asked the team behind the Array to answer your questions on the engineering challenges involved in such an ambitious project, and how much it all costs.

How long are the turbines designed to last and could their lifetime be extended or could they be replaced with like-for-like units? Could the Array exist indefinitely?

The lifetime of the turbines is approximately 24 years. It is possible that the turbine’s lifetime could be extended with refurbishments at appropriate intervals, and it is also possible to replace the turbines with new ones. This would need to be done within the consenting conditions that apply to London Array Phase 1. London Array has been developed under a 50-year lease for the site from the Crown Estate – which gives it a finite lifetime – and is not designed to be there indefinitely.

How much energy (in MWh) do you expect to generate annually? What is your expected load factor?

We expect a load factor of c.40%, giving output of c.2,200,000MWh – enough to meet the electricity needs of around 500,000 households.

How does the capital cost per MWh of predicted annual energy output compare to new nuclear and gas plants of the equivalent size?

Phase 1 of London Array cost £1.9bn to build, has a 630MW capacity and is expected to produce around 2,200,000MWh of electricity a year. Wind is currently a more expensive form of energy generation than traditional sources largely because it is a newer form of power plant, but the government has set a target of reducing the cost of offshore wind to £100/MWh.

One of the partners, DONG Energy, has also set a target of reducing the cost of its offshore wind projects to €100/MWh for projects sanctioned in 2020 and has put a number of plans into action in order to achieve that aim. Once constructed, offshore wind farms have relatively low operating costs and produce no waste products.

The analysts’ view

We asked two energy analysts for their views on the costs of offshore wind relative to other electricity sources, trends in wind turbine prices and to what degree offshore wind is artificially supported by subsidies.

Angus Crone, Bloomberg New Energy Finance

Our levelised cost of electricity model currently has offshore wind at $221 per MWh, onshore wind at $83, PV solar at $128, nuclear on $101 and combined cycle gas turbines (CCGT) at $70. Note that these are global averages and are levelised costs, not simply capital costs. They also exclude the costs of CO2 emissions in the case of CCGT gas.

Only about 45-50% of offshore wind capital costs are the turbine. The rest consists of foundations, cabling, installation etc, and there is probably even more scope for cost reductions there. Our estimate is that levelised costs of electricity for offshore wind will come down by 22% between 2012 and 2020. There will be further significant cost reductions beyond that.

We think costs will peak in the next couple of years and then fall

Offshore wind costs have already gone up in the last few years because of the move to deep water. We think costs will peak in the next couple of years and then fall, as improvements in installation knowhow, foundations and turbine technology outweigh the extra costs of going to deeper and deeper water.

Offshore wind projects would simply not be built at the moment without support provided by the roc scheme, or after 2017 the contracts for difference feed-in tariff scheme. However the government hopes that by supporting offshore wind now, it will make possible a big reduction in costs over the next 15 years and also help create a world-leading industry in the UK.
 

Wednesday, June 18, 2014

I got railroaded: A sorry day for the NH courts

Published May 9

It took 261 days to get this...

So the Brattleboro Reformer called me today to congratulate me on getting NH the boardwalk replaced. What a nice surprise! OK, we are even now. They are writing a story on it. Lets see, $1200 for the fine and another $1200 for the public defender...according to the Reformer the NHDOT says the new boardwalk cost $24,000.
 
I would have pissed my pants if the state said I got to pay back $24,000 instead of $1200. My analysis with the amount of damage they could say I did was $5000 to $10,000. I was bracing myself for $5000.  

He asked me, do you think your actions will get the state to replace the bridge. I said I am not big enough, but if you keep putting articles about the bridge in the newspaper with your big fat Brattleboro Reformer's mouth you might!

April 29:
The state might have realized replacing the bridges would be decades away...

April 23, 2014: This is the Anna Hunt Marsh Bridge. So they are reboarding the Brattleboro Bridge...both bridges. I hope they reboard all the way to the Vermont shore. I got them to re-board both bridges...

 

 A pile of old boards...

 

Note...I continuously up date this.Especially in the first week after I put it up.

But what about our bridges and roada? It just goes to show how fragile we are. No Hinsdale bridge for 59 years. Can you imgine it, taxing our hospitals keeps the ship afloat.
N.H.’s bond outlook falls from ‘stable’ to ‘negative’
Standard & Poor’s downgraded the state’s outlook on general obligation and state-guaranteed bonds from “stable” to “negative” yesterday, based largely on a recent court ruling that said a state tax on hospitals that brings in significant revenue is illegal. That ruling, combined with the state’s low reserve fund and unfunded pension liability, puts New Hampshire in a “thin financial position,” the report from the credit rating agency said.  
My 2013 campaign  was cut short by a arrest and a felony charge for littering with a "Build New Bridge" sign. The shovel is my symbol for lets start digging on the new bridge right now!

At the end of the day, I met my initial objective. (My objective with pulling up the boards was replacing the walkway like they did last week. My ultimate objective is replacing both bridges.)
 The came at great family and personal sacrifice and tension. The court and legal system broke my heart.
I said from day one, there are powerful, cohesive political and operative local forces going on under this.
The picture of the below is the condition last July 31, 2013...

Obviously the state and everyone knew the walkway was dangerous. This is the section I tried to repair. They didn’t repair anything on the Anna Hunt Marsh side. This new repair activity was keyed to my activity last summer.

Note: Look at that right side walkway railing. Why isn't the railing smooth instead of bumpy. You think they built it that way? Is the bridge settling or shifting in some way causing it? The walkway is a add on built in about mid 1995 brought to you by WalMart.

About 260 days later, a newly re-boarded walkway.  

I told my public defender once we ask for discovery there will be a response out of the state. Wouldn’t be surprised if we got a NHDOT move on the bridge. I found it suspicious as hell I got a recent inspection report talking about the condition of the walkway two days after I plead guilty. He just mailed me the report without even putting a context on when he got it.

I got railroaded! This case was always about higher principles and whistle blowing activities...



My lawyer said they are going to find me guilty...you gave them the evidence against you. There is a very large chance of a heavy fine and jail time if they wanted to make an example out of you. I reminded him you are going to have to hire civil engineer specializing in bridge design to counteract the state’s position. I bet you he was worried about the cost of the case i wanted to present. I wanted to get on the stand a bridge expert and the high officials in the NHDOT. I certainly wanted to talk about bigger bridge issues than the walkway...  


My take was I had to force them to repair the dangerous walkway through my activities. Surely the court and jurors would understand I was trying to protect them and the community. Mike, they are going to only go by what laws says, my lawyer said...not have a bigger thought about what justice and fairness means. He didn't think the jurors in this area had it in them to be decent citizens.



I think this repair last week is evidence the walkway was dangerous. They knew the condition of those boards were wrong as they inspected the walkway over the boards I pulled up last summer. Did they not do the repair looking forward to the possibility of my court case...I would get off. Fundamentally everyone withheld information from me and I had no way to enforce getting the available information that was necessary for my defense...or all the information I needed to make the final determination if i should take the plea.  



Did the debacle over the follow up Reformer article get their attention?

Was it  the legal disclosure over the NHDOT inspection report?

Me pleading guilty to my charges.

Like I said, it is all about how much money you have with getting justice. It's never about principle and doing the higher good! 
My lawyer said they got you dead to right...you will have no better chance if you go to court. He never opened the door a crack with we can get them to see the bigger societal benefit. My lawyer never even came down to the bridge and inspect it with me. I offered to do this and I thought it important.
I would have been satisfied with the deal if they didn't repair the walkway so quickly after I plead guilty. I now feel I got a unjust criminal conviction on my record. Before the repair last week, I felt I had an acceptable deal considering my limited options.  I always thought I could win if I could get the defense I wanted...better to the point , if I was convicted, all the activity would have pushed the NHDOT to do the right thing.
The police and the courts should have always been on my side if the true condition of that walkway was put on the table!  
I was intimidated by the police throwing at me a host serous classes A misdemeanor charges and the fictitious felony.   
I was intimidated by the gaming of the prosecutor into forcing me to accept her deal...she even came back with making me accept a stricter deal than the one she first proffered.
So they seriously overcharged me and they all played on it.
Right, I was told we can’t consider my little sin versus the bigger sins of the police department, the courts and the NHDOT...
It all got focused on their perception of what went on at bridge: disorderly conduct, one felony reckless conduct, two criminal mischiefs and a littering...I never could contradict the behavior of anyone else. They were the gods and I was an indigent nobody...
The injustice emanated from the extreme overcharging of the police department against me ...everything followed from that.  It would have been a different situation if all I got charged with is criminal mischief...the right charge. Everyone is playing rule-zies and throwing around their weight without a counteracting force of mine... none of this is justice!
The rule of law is not about following the extreme interpretation of laws.Or throwing a host of not justified complaints by the police to the prosecutor to set up the plea deal. It is about having a transparant, a fair and just system above the laws...it not about inflecting laws on everyone so we can pay the wages of the court employees and other government figures.
Basically, we never had a hearing over if the initial charges against me were fair...would overcharging me later lead to injustice....
Could they charge me with terrorism  just to give the prosecutor leverage over a potential deal or sentence down the road. Oh, we talked about that...
Right, 99% of these cases go to a plea. Does the police align the charges so it enhances a future plea deal...    
(Michael Mulligan, 60, was cited with reckless conduct, disorderly conduct, criminal mischief and littering, according to Hinsdale Police Lt. David Eldridge. Reckless conduct is a felony.)
OK, my behavior was trying to highlight the negligence of the NHDOT who should have long ago re-boarded that dangerous bridge. More to the larger point, that bridge should have been replaced decades ago. It’s a threat to Hinsdale’s economy...it is a safety threat to everyone who crosses that bridge.
If the police, prosecutor, courts and citizens (jurors) couldn't can’t weight my behavior on July 31, 2013 against the bigger picture of walkway safety and the wider issues of the safety of the bridge...then I am living really in Russia! I am not living in a “just” democracy! Generally our state management of the NHDOT is spinning out of control...the courts and me don't have the power to straightening out this mess.  
And the whole aim of all this selectman, police, prosecutor and court activity has been to prohibit or limiting me from my Constitutional rights with protesting about bad government at these bridges and informing the community at large.  
I leave you with one final thought. If you can’t trust the state (NHDOT) to do the right thing (replace and re-nail the boards) in the heat of my activities surrounding last July 31, 2013, how can you trust the state to do the right thing and make accurate bridge inspections (Hinsdale) during the intense political heat surrounding the NHDOT budgets? 
The response from my lawyer..he certainly can argue a case. 
I find your post to be very unfair and inaccurate. I always told you I would argue on your behalf at trial if that was what you wanted, and we did a substantial amount of investigation for you and would have continued to do so if that’s what you wanted to do. I never said people didn’t care about larger issues of justice, just that I did not believe people would condone removing the boards as your manner of protest. I still believe you almost certainly would have been convicted at trial. I find it very disappointing that I spent many hours discussing your case and fine philosophical and legal points with you and made clear that it was your decision and then you portray me as some uncaring lawyer who “railroaded” you into a plea bargain that you chose to enter. You received one document after the plea because my investigator didn't receive it until after the plea.
(I'd seen the police disclosures...I never seen any of the investigator or other results.)  
(I frame it as the courts railroaded me.) 
My response
There is a difference betwen arguing a case on nothing and my ability to gain factual information and gaining professionale expertise- engineer witness.


So why wasn't I appraised of the investigative results...
Looking in hindsight, I never fully trusted you and the system.
Look it, you were a very minor player here really at fault...i was more speaking of the whole. (The system set you up for this is how I see this)
I should have taken you more seriously when you told me you thought I was guilty, or other people would consider me guilty, even as all the possible evidence couldn't or wouldn't get seen. (You never understood the case or the principles.) 
I was just trying to throw you a constructive criticism I am sure you don't very often...you can take parts of it at heart or discount everything I say.
Mike
Remember there is two sides to every story...I wasn't inexperienced with managing a legal case. I'd do a lot better the next time in 45 years...my last run in with the law. I am not asking you to discount his side.

...Remember, I watched a young bartender get away with a DUI at district court. His blood level was above the legal limit. He got off because of burping before two blow test, after the statie told him not to burp bother time...It was a improper stop, the officer tried intimidating him on the stop and got angry over the burping and won't give him a legitimate test. He told the staties after the second test, it was positive...I burped again and I was afraid of you because I knew were getting irritated with me. He also gave a bad and inaccurate field test. I'd seen how the sins of the obviously guilty could be overridden by the sins of the police and system...I'd seen the works of a amazingly talented lawyer. Ultimately the case gave feedback to the state police...how to preform a correct DUI intervention. It question if this state police officer needed more training.

Right, if that bridge collapses and many people get hurt, damages our economy….everyone and the system is going argue I am still guilty with lifting up them unattached boards. Mike, you received the best justice there is in New Hampshire. I though when I done this I would get convicted…my eyes were wide open…the outcome was solely my choice.

I don't care if this is the rules...then the rule and laws should be changed...

Unfair…what is unfair is my conscience would not let me walk past this.

But I know the majority of the people in the 10,000 cars per day going down route 119 near the bridges would agree with me the bridges are unsafe and needs to be replaced decades ago. But mike, nothing ever changes in Hinsdale and New Hampshire. Just accept it!

I know there is no such thing as a claw back, do over or reset on on my court case…

And I harbor no ill wind against anyone. My spiritual beliefs require me to forgive everyone who i perceive as harmed me. Cause they never really harmed me...it is my poor thinking that I think I was harmed. I am only expected to morally act...the outcome in this world have no meaning to me when I think at my highest level. I am required to be non violent...not hurt people.  I am required to state my opinion and get it on the record so people can make up their own minds.

To put this in perspective, it was only a little fine and it was only a class B misdemeanor and a $1000 dollar fine. My activities have been restricted at the bridge based on the phony rationale I was obstructing traffic. Do they have any proof I was obstructing traffic. It was explained to me, this is a agreement between you and the prosecutor...the agreement need not be based on the facts, evidence or truthfulness. The procicutor and police can make up I was obstructing traffic. It doesn't even have to be moral or ethical...it is just a agreement. 

It was very little harm…like a mosquito bite. But nobody can really hurt me except my incorrect thinking.

 

By the way, they assign you a lawyer. You don’t get a choice of what lawyer is best for you. They never discuss a process if you are uncomfortable…you can choose another public defender. Like, interview three of our lawyers, choose what one you want.

I can hear my lawyer now, a plea or agreement doesn’t need your understanding of the pertinent facts. Nobody owes you the truth!!!


Tuesday, June 17, 2014

July 2013: State of Emergency in Hinsdale NH Over Route 119 Bridge

July 23, 2013
State of Emergency in Hinsdale NH over Route 119 Bridge

Dear Loriella Babkirk,

What a pretty first name!

 I received a copy of your e-mail titled "RE: Brattleboro/ Hinsdale Bridge" dated July 8, 2013 a few days ago. The documents were placed anonymously on the open front seat of my car at the approach of the Route 119 Brattleboro. Actually, I got the Vermont and NH state DOT officials’ response to youy letter also with all the attachments. You haven’t seen the truth in these official state responses and their documents.

By the way, could somebody send me through e-mail those NHDOT bridge inspection reports and photos stated in the attachments please…the five attachments?

You know, everyone’s got to start buckling up here right now. This ride is going to get goddamn rough.

I am the guy at the Route 119 Hinsdale bridges blessing you and everyone else who passes this area. Have you recently seen me dressed up with my nice halo as a bridge safety angel? I am warning all of the lands with an impending bridge collapse or closure in the near future. It is going to be an economic, individual and multi community catastrophe.
As you know, I have spent considerable time at the bridge this year. This is my third year working on this project. I am the talk of the town in Hinsdale...mostly positive and a few even threatening harm to me. Most of Hinsdale thinks I have really gone overboard with my halo and blue angel get-up. Pictures of pathetic me wearing a halo are on my blog! See pictures on my blog!

I would consider our grossly technically obsolete 1921 and dangerously degraded bridge…engineers language… being a “super fracture critical” bridge! The collapsed I35 Minneapolis Bridge was built in 1964 and the I-5 Skagit River Bridge was built in 1955. The Hinsdale/Brattleboro Bridges were built in 1921. The Concord, NH Sewalls Falls road bridge five miles north of Concord, NH was built in 1915. This is the future of our bridge.   

NTSB 2007 Investigation into the Minneapolis I35 Bridge Collapse 

“NTSB findings:

Because the deck truss portion of the I-35W bridge was non-load-path redundant, the total collapse of the deck truss was likely once the gusset plates at the U10 nodes failed.

Non-load-path-redundant: The condition where fracture of an individual structural element (a fracture-critical element) could lead to a partial or total collapse of the entire bridge. A bridge that is non-load-path-redundant is not inherently unsafe, but it does lack redundancy in the design of its support structure. Such bridges are sometimes referred to as fracture critical. The I-35W bridge was of a non-load-path-redundant design.”

I will speak plainly to you. I think the NH bridge inspection process is severely corrupted. The NHDOT roads and bridges budget has been severely restrained for many years now. NH got a huge back log of projects. We are never going to catch up to our responsibilities.  They don't have enough money to keep the 1921 Hinsdale Bridge functional and up to date with maintenance considering the growth of traffic and large trucks. So these guys just close their eyes to Hinsdale. The NHDOT fear the enormous political fallout if they are forced to restrict flow of the traffic or close the bridge. NHDOT fears more the approximate $35 million dollar cost with the replacement bridge.

New Hampshire and their NHDOT are in existentialism’s vice between money limitations and vital societal pubic needs. It ends up as a disproportional war against small town and rural New Hampshire from the powerful well-heeled and high population areas. An unfair and severely unsafe proportion of the NHDOT budgets (and stimulus) has been going to the powerful well healed Concord, Nashua and our NH golden seacoast corridor triangle. This is Boston’s exurbia bedroom community within New Hampshire. That blood sucking sound you hear is all the big southeast NH transportation projects stealing our hopes and dreams from us…the jobs and transportation resources from rural NH.

Our Route 119 Hinsdale/Brattleboro Bridge is tragically obsolete and fracture critical. I keep thinking about the disgusting bent, corroded gusset and the deeply displaced vertical member caused by a vehicle crash on our bridge. How  come that wasn’t ever repaired. This indicates a profound agency attitude with valuing human life and infrastructure engineering integrity.

“I-5 Bridge listed as 'fracture critical”

Columbia River span could collapse if hit with big enough blow

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

Both spans of the Interstate 5 Bridge over the Columbia River are considered "fracture critical" by the Oregon Department of Transportation, meaning if one crucial part of the bridge sustains a big enough blow, the bridge could collapse.

 In it, the I-5 Columbia River Bridge is categorized as a bridge without safety redundancies or backups that would prevent it from collapsing if part of a bridge truss is damaged or removed.

"If one of the fracture-critical pieces is somehow taken out, removed or fails in some way, the whole bridge could collapse," Oregon transportation spokesman Don Hamilton said Tuesday. He declined to specify where the bridge would need to be damaged in order to collapse, because he didn't want to make the bridge's weak spots public.

It is the absence of our tiny voice within New Hampshire government with how we control the arterial life blood flow within little Hinsdale and all of the small town and rural New Hampshire. And our tiny voice stands up for the efficiency of traffic flow and safety for our surrounding communities and bordering states. The majority of the flow of traffic on Hinsdale’s route 119 is not our town’s people. This itty bitty voice in the wilderness is sticking up for the safety interest of the multitudes. They all come from far and wide for passage through our town or to see our little rendition of heaven. 

I am saying, who is going to oversee and regulate the state bridge inspectors?  Who is going to inspect the NH bridge inspectors? I wouldn’t be surprised after reading the 2007 NTSB’s Minneapolis I35 bridge report if knowingly grossly inaccurate and falsified state and federal documents are legal in New Hampshire. You know, the privilege of kings with total unaccountability. This is a fundamental flaw with our nation. We don’t have one highway and road standard, seeing how we send many million dollars to the states. Our federal system should have stick oversight of the State Dots. As an example, just look at the I-35 Minneapolis bridge collapse. There was many known long term flaws in bridge maintenance and state DOT engineering codes. Who is going to step in if the states don’t give a shit?      

So the easy way out of this political mess is to falsify bridge inspections and state and federal documents. The NHDOT staff and officials of NHDOT are severely demoralized, underpaid and intimidated by severely underfunded and highly politicalized agency state budgets. The NHDOT employees are all facing massive and unprecedented employee, personal and official layoffs and firings in the next two years. The organizations are a "black hole" with withholding information and selective truth telling for political, personal and career protection. Just give them the minimum transparency, boys…for our protection. This is black hole organization is beyond the control of any entity on the planet because of their self-interested selective truth-telling, lying and object and uncontested NH and federal illegal document falsification.

So below article is an analogy for similar cultures and systems across many organizations.  Who plays the roles of the patients, the doctors, the medical employees and the medical establishment and the bureaucracy in our system of bridges, towns, employees, voters/taxpayers/ public, the feds, state DOT  and our wider transportation system. If the NHDOT respects their professional employees more will Hinsdale town’s people be more secure and safe? At least the citizens of Hinsdale would have a lot more accurate information to engage our state politicians. Of course, our state government never operates on the facts. Is the sick patient the Hinsdale Route 119 Bridge or is it all the people and businesses who use our bridges?   

Why is government always hiding in the deep shadows?

Where is the respect of us and why is it lacking in in our wider culture and system? I bet you it’s all related to greed and economic insecurity? 

“In a Culture of Disrespect, Patients Lose Out” (NYT)

I’ve always thought about respect as common decency, something we should do because it’s simply the right thing to do. In the medical world, we certainly need to strive for respectful behavior, especially given our historically rigid pecking order, our ingrained traditions of hierarchical bullying and, of course, a primary constituency — patients — who are often on uniquely vulnerable footing.

 But then I stumbled across two articles in Academic Medicine that talked about respect as an issue of patient safety. The authors, a group of doctors and researchers at Harvard Medical School, outlined the myriad acts of disrespect that we’ve come to accept as a way of life in medicine, and showed how these can lead to a final pathway of harm to our patients.

This shift in perspective was a shock to the system. When we tolerate a culture of disrespect, we aren’t just being insensitive, or obtuse, or lazy, or enabling. We’re in fact violating the first commandment of medicine. How can we stand idly by when our casual acceptance of disrespect is causing the same harm to our patients as medication errors, surgical mistakes, handoff lapses and missed lab results?

… Though these annoyances may seem trivial,  this lack of respect “undermines morale, and inhibits transparency and feedback,” the authors write. Morale, transparency and feedback are pillars of preventing medical error. Patients ultimately bear the brunt of this unhealthy atmosphere.

…Added to the clarion call should be patient safety. The connection between disrespectful behavior to patient safety should be made explicit in our efforts, since this is a rallying point that everyone can agree on. Medical staff members should absolutely be holding ourselves to the highest bar of professional and respectful conduct. We have no excuses for anything less. But beyond this, the medical system needs to re-evaluate itself and the way it respects — or disrespects — its own workers, and by extension, its patients.

We are still trying to figure out what this NHDOT scientific and engineering phrase means. A lead “bridge inspector” told us this. He was performing a bridge inspection this spring. We got pictures...see my blog. He told us his group was just "corn cobbing" these bridges. What does "corn cobbing" a bridge inspection mean? This is such obscene disrespect to concerned members of the public.

So this is my blog: "The Poppervillve Town Hall”.
 
Don't forget to click on my other articles and links in my blog...I pictured up most of the underneath of the Route 119 Brattleboro and Hinsdale bridge. Scroll down to look at all of my bridge pictures...you won't be able to stop. These are dangerously obscene pictures of the structures of the bridge.

The Vermont DOT officials might recognize my name. I took pictures of their I 91 (between exit 1 and 2) “William Street" interstate bridge in early 2007. See my pictures of this now demolished bridge under steamshovel2002 and Flickr. Those bridge piers were in dangerously and atrocious conditions. This rather new 1960 (smile) bridge was functionally obsolete. The I91 Interstate Bridge was dangerously narrow and didn’t have safety breakdown lanes like Hinsdale’s route 119 bridges.

Do you remember a tractor trailer who was trying to miss a skidded and stalled car on the Williams Street Bridge? The semi tried to skid around the stalled car on the north bound bridge. Instead, he went right through the bridge railings like tissue paper to his death. I renamed that bridge the Vermont “Daddy Killer Bridge” because the driver had young kids. What shall I name the Hinsdale Route 119 Bridges?

I thinking “The Route 119 Hinsdale, NH Family Killer Bridges“. I could make this a sign and plaster the bridges with it.

I forced Vermont into the replacement of these bridges and many blame me with a rethink on the conditions of all I 91 bridges. This demolished young (humor) bridge was built in the early 1960 and the new bridges are 1000 times more gorgeous than the dead headed baby boomer bridge when we were developing our Interstate system.   

Man, I am in love with those new huge concrete piers holding the new Brattleboro "William Street" bridge. You know, those NJ style integral to the bridge concrete safety barriers will certainly contain any fully loaded tractor trailer. The Vermont DOT official knows what i mean. Mr. Mike Hedges of the VTDOT, you tell the NHDOT how powerful my pictures are. They are going bend to my will!

So here is my list of safety and economic concerns with the Route 119 Hinsdale bridges. They are all pictured up on my blog. If any of these issues are missing and not explained in detail in the past NHDOT inspection reports this is “prima facia” evidence there is massive NHDOT bridge fraud and falsification of paperwork throughout the state. It is NHDOT bridge illegal paperwork falsification to meet a political and self-interested ends? My experience with organizational lying and fraud…it doesn’t happen in one spot in the organizations. The rot is in everything in the organization and in related organizations.   

1)   A few days ago I was on the Brattleboro side of the Route 119 Bridge and standing directly across from the new Whetstone Station restaurant. I had my halo on and was dressed up as a blue angel warning everyone of an impending bridge collapse. Dave, the owner of the restaurant walked over to me. I thought he was irked that I was scaring away his customers. He has a large bar with huge windows facing my protest area on the Hinsdale side of the bridge. Seems, they were watching me. These huge picture windows have a gorgeous elevated view of the Connecticut River and Wantastiquet Mountain. I asked him if I am chasing away your customers. He said not at all. I explained I am trying to replace this bridge. Dave said I am totally on your side. Then he asked me, “Did you hear about the recent serious bicycling accident on the bridge walkway?”

The bridge wooden walkway has many loose and warped planks. It is much worse than last year. As a bicyclist was crossing the bridge walkway, his tire flipped up a loose plank. He did an Endo…flipped over the handle bars on the bridge. He crashed into the railing banging his head and breaking his shoulders. He was almost thrown into the river. He was stunned. Dave called the ambulance. The bicyclist said he would have been dead if he was flipped into the river.

So this spring I was interviewing my NHDOT “corn cobbling” lead bridge inspector buddy. I got pictures of this…see my blog. I said at one point, you guys got big problems with the bridge walkway wooden planks. Most of the planks are loose and many warping. It is getting worst. Some planks are warping where the middle is sticking up and many are warping where one end sticks way up in the air. He told me, “the iron metal structure that attaches the planks by screws to the bride is too corroded to accept the screws.” “It is all just rust down there and all the screws just spin.” You got to wonder will the wooden walkway collapse into the river someday. I told “Mr Corn cobbing bridge inspector” (2013), you know, we got many disabled people with motorized wheelchairs traveling this walkway. They complain to me about the plank bumps and the not snow blowed walkways in the winter? They mostly go the convenience store in the old Wal-Mart store.  


“These bridges have an increasing diabetic rotting wasting disease…”

“The bridge underneath looks like this diabetic's rotting legs and bridge's rotting railings and beams.”

“There is a lot of grass over-growth into the middle of the sidewalk that rubs onto his wheelchair and face. Robert worries a piece of metal will get pulled out into the walkway and then he not sees it. It cuts his leg and then he can't control the infection, or the cut won't heal. Then they have to cut off the leg. A fallen down branch could be hidden in the overgrown grass onto the sidewalk...again he is at extreme risk with losing a limb if it cuts or bruises him. This could easily put him in the grave.”

“The little spin in his wheel chair is one of the few freedoms Robert has.”

“He has had his family fixing the ruts (sidewalk) in this asphalt sidewalk.” (So his wheelchair wouldn’t fall over or make him stuck in place.)

…“Here is Robert right to your face (Sept 24, 2012). You notice the decaying bridge wood walkway planking under his wheelchair...many loose and warped big time.”

Note: My blog and my picture (fall 2012) of Robert’s diabetic leg and the rotting bridge railing made the NHDOT fix the cancerous railing in the 2013 spring inspection. May god have mercy on all our runaway monstrous Frankenstein New Hampshire souls? You see the rotting wooden planks under the rotting railing and this poor man’s wheelchair. They completely ignored the dangerous wooden planks and the screws that wouldn’t catch. This unsafe walkway are well known to NHDOT for many years.

Hinsdale use to remove the snow from the walkway with their special sidewalk plowing vehicle. They stopped because Hinsdale figured out the machine was too heavy for the walkway and  it was also scraping up the loose wooded planks. Why can’t they drive down the road with a snow blower in a pickup? Why can’t the state pay Hinsdale to snow blow the state walkway? How come the bridge walkway doesn’t get snow plowed in the winter? I get it, money, money, money!

You know what I am really trying do here; I am trying to save the soul of the state of New Hampshire!

You see the New Hampshire monstrous disregard for the value of human life with the Route 119 Hinsdale/ Brattleboro bridge walkway issue. Let’s role play the NHDOT District 4 Engineer’s job. Did you see his pathetically poverty stricken and isolated list of small towns in his area. One can only imagine the magnitude the long list of backlogged transportation jobs for his District. I wonder what the criteria is for shoving out NHDOT projects in his district? I bet it is political and population density!

So the Hinsdale Route 119 bridge walkways come to his attention. They are in unsafe condition. He knows he just can’t put screws into the rotting wooden planks. They pop that baby open and he knows it going to be a complete rework of the walkway and their iron support structure. He knows if they go mucking around the bridge deck support iron beams and severely corroded gussets might need a lot of work. The job cost could get really big and shut the bridge anyways. The bridge is obsolete by four times and it is breathing its death throes. He goes spending big bucks in Hinsdale…then ten other towns in his district are going to be looking to string him up to their worst bridge.

It makes you wonder if we are seeing a NHDOT organizational disease. We make one of those “facilitative assumptions” where the bridge is so dilapidated and old, why waste money in it. A new bridge is right around the corner so shut your eyes and don’t waste money on it. The state effectively disconnects itself from the overseeing the bridge and doing the proper upkeep of it. A young or middle-age bridge has a huge value in it so we will take care of it. A decrepit bridge is so ugly and expensive…just turn away your eyes from it and don’t look. It is only human nature. Is there something in our brain or organization that unintentionally turns off our caring because of these affects…obscures our vision and curiosity?    

The below from the most recent spring 2013 Environmental Assessment is interesting. The first Wal-Mart store forced Hinsdale and the NHDOT to construct a sidewalk and a walkway. With the rot going on in wooden planks and rotting iron works who won’t hold a screw or hold on to the planks, it must be a cheaply defective design and construction of this walkway.

You know, that is the “New Hampshire Advantage”. It is a whole set of half ass fixes and “facilitative assumptions”. This unseen and hidden corruption goes on for decades after decades into the indefinite.  A facilitative assumption is when a CEO, politician and agency head…especially the professional class and engineers…who knowingly makes a corrupt critical organizational decision based on self-interest or a narrow interest in order to save his job and career. You make an assumption deep under the citizenry and employees, knowingly not aligned with the facts or the greater good in order fulfill a narrow and shallow interest. It is dastardly hidden corruption deep behind the scenes that screws all the innocent and good citizens. It mostly benefits the professional class and the politicians.

There are also good facilitative assumptions. A young man makes a mistake. You think he is just inexperience and immature…but you give him many breaks because you know he will become a great man. You will make him a great man. And he then does become a great man.

Heuristics is related this…   
 

BRATTLEBORO, VT – HINSDALE, NH TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR BRF 2000(19)SC  June, 2013
 
…In 1993 a sidewalk was installed on the north side of both bridges…

So the Hinsdale bridge walkway becomes direly unsafe…the District 4 Engineer’s choices are to refurbish the walkway or to block the walkway from further traffic. He doesn’t have the funding to do our bridge walkways. All the pedestrians will then have to walk the bridge deck roadway. Two opposing cars at the same time got barely enough room to pass each other…certainly there in insufficient room for two big trucks. Can you image the hue and cry to the District 4 Engineer and Concord if they make pedestrians walk on the functionally obsolete bridge road bed without any safety breakdown lane? Believe me; the daily peak traffic doesn’t have enough room to get the cars by without a lot of time delay, with the sharp 90 degree turn and massive public speeding.

I know the solution considering the realities in Concord, NH and keeping my job…only one lane of traffic going across the one bridge at one time. Here comes the New Hampshire Advantage? It will reduce the traffic stress of the bridge to extend the bridge life and allow pedestrians to passage the bridge without a separated walkway. Everyone will be safe.  But traffic will be backed up all the way to Putney and Winchester?

Many people and my own family have come up to me to explain how impacted and inconvenienced they will be. Mike, if the bridge closes, you are going to eat up between two to three hours a day with a round trip. We are talking about 30 miles and verging on $10 bucks a day. This is going to severely impact thousands of innocent people. Mike, you know your town is poverty stricken and most of our community is struggling with inadequate income and time. This is going to hurt the poor way more than anyone else…don’t even talk about gasoline prices. Mike, you are stealing money right out of their purses and pockets. 
 
So you got conflicting human needs and budgets, priories and limitations... budgets, priorities and limitations are always extraordinarily immoral. The limitations always get concentrated in the poorest and weakest segments of our society. The state of New Hampshire with this NH Advantage has become a monster to our weakest and poorest. It is tax breaks for the big boys and suffering and insecurity for the bottom half…

The bridge inspection group leader right in front of me turned a blind eye to the deterioration of safety with the walkway…he knew injuries and possible deaths was right around the corner. The enormous consequences without adequate budgets for valuing human life was too severe for the NHDOT and the Districts 4 Engineer…the known severely degraded walkway wooden planks and the iron works that holds up the walkway. The easy default that just defers pain and suffering…compared to shutting downing down the bridge, walkway or gaining more funding for the NH transportation system…was to knowingly turn a blind eye to the rotting walkway and to falsify NH and federal documents.

As Ralph Nader once chewed us all out…he said it was always about the least worst choice. It always about the least worst choice. It is never about our highest or best choice. It is never about us all being honorable men and women. The miserable and rotten system makes our lives all about least worst choices. Our children live whole least worst lives. Did god make a least worst Universe?  

You know when an organization is near brain dead…where they don’t appreciate paper work and the bureaucracy. Were everyone in trained that documented observations and concerns are extraordinarily important attributes for a learning organization. You make it easily document their concerns in public form and you make is the issues non erasable and searchable. You hold yourself accountable to the voter, public, and everyone.

If you ignore something or miss it then a person can come back through the recorded document. I warned them. Here, this is from their system…see, they got a pattern going on here. I am telling you this is powerful stuff and it leverages experiences in the learning organization.

Then you got the constant do nothing complainers. You say stop that chatter, do something about it. Make a complaint and stick with to the end. The rumor is these guys are serious with complaints and you can change things. Right, you are talking about public participation and the little guy gaining faith in government. But I am crazy guy at the foot of the bridge wearing a halo and putting a cut blue sheet over my shoulders…     

It is easily apparent to me the NHDOT increasingly is losing the organizational ability to discriminate between little human safety risk or community well-being risk and enormous risk of injury, death and widespread wellbeing risk to a community. They increasingly can’t separate the background noise from an important signals or message. The NHDOT is facing deepening troubles with NHDOT budgets and ever increasing to-do-list of degraded roads, bridge and infrastructure. A human’s brain or organization ability to discriminate big problems from little problems is a wonderful gift…when a brain is forced to discriminate too much it becomes exhausted or we call it we “become numbed”. Becoming numb in high consequence organizations, as is in prolong driving a car in heavy metropolitan congestion and traffic becomes extraordinarily dangerous when you become numbed…is very dangerous.  It is much like if an organization dances around or jumps over the fire too much…you become numb to the dangers of the fire.

I am warning you, New Hampshire is a runaway monster without a conscience…or they have become severely numbed by an increasing assortment of problems, financial problems and pressures. They can’t tell right from wrong, background noise from critical warnings and information. NH is acting as a monster…we have become monsters because we have become so inattentive, exhausted and numbed because of insecurity, inadequate resources and increasing needs.   

2)   You got real issues with this 1921 (Brattleboro) bridge swinging, vibrating and swaying under light load and traffic conditions. It gets much worst increasingly with heavier traffic. Two or three cars and a pickup truck on the bridge gets that bridge vibrating uncomfortably. Heavy traffic, big trucks and especially semis creates stomach wrenching vibrations, creates resonant traffic vibrations.  I am taking about swaying and up and down…plus the big vibrations. There got to be some engineering limits or standards to this dangerous motion. Something is really wrong with that bridge.

I consider this abnormal bridge movement a dire warning of imminent bridge collapsed and a direly weak or damaged bridge structure. I kid everyone; you have to take your motion sickness (Dramamine) meds if you don’t want to throw up before you get 350 feet to the other side of the bridge.

I am just saying, you could have a lot of unseen damage and degradation to the bridge stiffening structural members, relatively small iron works…this could set up this tragic heavy unnatural vibration and swaying. It just could be a poor design for the conditions we place this 1921 bridge under with the heavier vehicles and never anticipated heavy traffic. Traffic levels drastically are on the way up too in the coming years…   

They got small cell phone like instrumentation and powerful accelerometers. They could record the bridge vibration and send them the data intermittently through the cell phone system. They got decent accurate modern computer structural programs…they could give you a normal range of bridge vibrations. It would give you an early indication of developing bridge problems. Did I remind you this bridge is 93 years old?    

It is interesting thinking about the historic and future daily average traffic going across this bridge. As I say, New Hampshire is a monster without a conscience to think our “hanging by thread”severely degraded bridge can withstand the beating of 13,000 car and trucks per day for any length of time.

Think about this increasingly severe degradation going on in an assortment of 1921 bridge components and 13,000 vehicles traveling across the bridge in 2015. They should put the NHDOT executives into the Brattleboro Retreat. You catch trend with the rate of change of vehicles a day going over this in a very short period?  How much traffic will the farm tractor supply store and burgeoning fireworks industry bring us by 2020? My best estimate with the politics of New Hampshire is the new bridge won’t be built for 50 years.

The 1915 “Sewalls Falls Road Bridge” in Concord NH is another of the NHDOT’s Frankenstein monsters with allowing huge chunks of the bridge to fall off and they say you are good to go till  2015 if you cross that bridge with your eyes closed. Hinsdale is heading directly to the Sewalls Falls Road Bridge with huge weight restriction and lane limitations.

God help us all if the economy picks up?   

2010: 7200 vehicles per day (vpd)

2012: 9700 vpd

2015: 13,000 vpd  

This spring I asked my “corn cobbling” NHDOT Bridge lead inspector buddy if this bridge is swaying and vibrating dangerously? He said the new Navy Seabees Bridge does the same vibrating and swinging…all modern bridge does this to minimize stresses. It sounded good from a NHDOT bridge inspection leader, right. I wonder how much bridge inspection training they really get and their educations levels. These guys probable get a three week quickie course and a few days of training every ten years. The first thing NH cuts has always been training and education.

The next thing I know I was then standing for 2 hours in the middle of the New Route 9 Connecticut River Seabees Bridge four miles upstream from Hinsdale in heavy traffic. It is really a beautiful and sturdy bridge. The bridge doesn’t have any walkway, the old bridge is the walkway…so I was standing on the unprotected spacey and gorgeous breakdown safety lane. I mean, what was I going to tell the cops if they came? I was trying to get a feel for the bridge vibration? They would have been taking me to Retreat. It was solid and vibration free. It was if I standing on a granite outcrop on the nearby Wantastiquet Mountain. I think all these NHDOT employees are habituated into lying and telling half-truths to the stupid mushroom public. Or just not talking when they know something…

3)  What is up with that huge anchor bolt not being attached to the concrete footing on the Brattleboro Bridge’s southern corner side? Why is the really thick iron plate bent that attaches the nut to the dangling anchor bolt?  Why is the thick iron plate below the bent iron plate mostly destroyed by corrosion and it is 80% delaminated? The concern I have with seeing this picture with the original 1921 concrete, is massive degradation of the bridge west concrete footing. The big semis would be beating the hell out of this concrete. As with the massive unseen corrosion destruction of the iron plates seen in my picture that is deep within the belly of this beast, how assured can we be that the other iron structural components on or near the footing or foundation are not destroyed.

“WSDOT Bridge Design Manual”

Obviously, bridges cannot be built incrementally longer without eventually requiring expansion joint devices. The incidence of approach pavement distress problems increases markedly with increased movement that must be accommodated by the end diaphragm pressing against the backfill. Approach pavement distress includes pavement and backfill settlement and broken approach slab anchors.

…If some means was not used to accommodate this, the bridge could buckle.

4)   The Brattleboro Bridge has no expansion joint. Our bridge can expand and contract to the tune of 2 to 6 inches between the extremes of the outside seasonal temperatures. Both sides of these bridges are hard attached by multiple large anchor bolts to the crumbling 1921 concrete footing or foundation. The bridge has an expansion joint on the west side…it is non-functional…the deck is hard attached to the footing on both side.  Why isn’t a lack of a functioning bridge expansion joint leading to serious bridge degradation and an eventual bride collapse? I think this is a critical bridge design error and it is amazing that massive bridge damage hasn’t shown up yet…

NTSB 2007 Investigation into the Minneapolis I35 Bridge Collapse

“Expansion joint: A meeting point between two parts of a structure that is designed to allow for independent movement of the parts due to thermal expansion while protecting the parts from damage. Expansion joints are commonly visible on a bridge deck as a hinged or movable connection perpendicular to the roadway”

5)   The bridge rollers are frozen in place and a roller (rocker bearing) is displaced at an angle indicating severe bridge movement. I got a feeling during prior bridge renovations and refurbishment the NHDOT intentionally bypassed the bridge rollers by hard connecting the bridge deck to the footing or foundation though huge anchor bolting?

NTSB 2007 Investigation into the Minneapolis I35 Bridge Collapse

 “Rocker bearing: A bridge support bearing that accommodates thermal expansion and contraction of the superstructure through a rocking action.”

This should be damaging the bridge and leading to a bridge collapse as read in all the bridge engineering and maintenance procedures. It leads to much more expensive maintenance on a bridge on a not maintained bridge. It should be noticed the traffic entrance at both ends of the bridge comes on the bridge at an angle or not good geometry…not a straight shot across the bridge including their entrances. It is a lot to torque (centrifugal) and stress for a bridge with a car or heavy truck turning on the bridge at high speeds. This creates all sorts unnatural bridge stress with the modern vehicle weights and unimagined traffic at bridge design time that was never considered in the initial bridge analysis. See pictures in my blog.

6)   On the west side of the Brattleboro Bridge the huge upper truss (2) iron beams (holds up the deck) are connected to the concrete by a huge metal bracket (4). A huge metal nut and bolt, along with metal plates, holds the critical truss to the concrete abutment or footing. There is massive and severe corrosion going on in all these components. The concrete footing is severely cracked and spalled allowing road water to intrude deeply into the degraded abutment or/and footing. I estimate the safety critical truss, bolting and brackets are more than 70% destroyed. Stomach wrenching and throwing up disgusting pictures of these components are on my blog. The pictures from my camera don’t near capture how bad this area is and  can’t give you a good impression of the depth of wastage.      

7)   The whole Brattleboro Bridge East entrance is subsiding and shifting.  This includes the bridge abutment, footing, foundation, masonry materials, the large granite blocks are displaced, piers and the whole east end of the bridge. In the right weather conditions, saturated soil the heavy truck vibrations  could get massive shifting or a landside of the entrance under soil ending with the huge bridge and its passengers calving into the river. That includes both sided of the bridge detaching from the foundations with its weak attachments and the bridge tipping over in the river. We have no idea what is under the bridge foundation…it is probably river sand, composting sentiment and compacting mud. In 1921 you can’t count on it being rock ledge or granite bed rock. Remember “Island Park” is nothing but a Connecticut River sand bar.   

8)   Let’s play the “value of human” life hide and seek game? State NHDOT peek-a-boo. This should take the breath away from any bridge civil engineer of any standing what-so-ever.

NTSB 2007 Investigation into the Minneapolis I35 Bridge Collapse 

Distortion of Gusset Plates: The Safety Board concludes that distortion such as bowing is a sign of an out-of-design condition that should be identified and subjected to further engineering analysis to ensure that the appropriate level of safety is maintained.

Can you find the bent and detaching bridge gusset on the Brattleboro Bridge? Bent and damage bridge gussets are a severe indication of imminent bridge failure or collapse. You blind and stupid civil engineers’ need a clue and a real life, it is on the east side of the Brattleboro Route 119 Bridge with the subsiding bridge entrance and its foundation, and the severe corrosion to the upper truss connection, to the bridge crumbling foundation. 


BRATTLEBORO, VT – HINSDALE, NH TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR BRF 2000(19)SC  June, 2013 

‘The existing substructures are a mix of concrete and masonry materials. Vertical and horizontal clearances are inadequate by current AASHTO design standards. In 1988 structural elements were replaced. In 1993 a sidewalk was installed on the north side of both bridges. In 2003 precast concrete deck panels were installed on both bridges. Despite ongoing maintenance efforts, both bridges are considered seriously deteriorated due to river scouring at the foundations, concrete spalling in the abutments and piers, and corrosion to the structural steel framing.”

9)   Towards the west end of the Brattleboro Bridge a vertical member, maybe a diagonal member near the road bed is severely bent and displaced. I suspect it occurred on contact with a snow plow or it comes from a vehicle accident when this member wasn’t protected by, maybe the 1988 installed guard rail job.

NTSB 2007 Investigation into the Minneapolis I35 Bridge Collapse 

“Corrosion on Gusset Plates: The I‑35W bridge was only one of a number of steel truss bridges that were found to have gusset plate corrosion and section loss that had been overlooked or underestimated by State bridge inspectors. In 1996, gusset plates on the eastbound Lake County Grand River bridge in Ohio failed while the bridge was undergoing maintenance. The failure was attributed to corrosion and section loss, which had completely penetrated the gusset plates at some locations. The amount of section loss had been masked by corrosion products to the extent that it could not be adequately assessed solely through visual bridge inspections.”

The below road grade gusset to which the vertical member is attached is severely corroded and the rust is black and delaminating. It’s got two huge rust bubbles on this gusset protruding out maybe a quarter inch on each side and thick delaminated rust layers can clearly be seen. The gusset is below road level and it is exposed to a lot of salt in the winter. I suspect the significant vehicle contact bent the lower gusset in two places…this is where the cancerous rust is growing. For all the below road grade gussets I intensely inspected, this gusset is by far the worst…this is ””way”” worse than any of the others.

NTSB 2007 Investigation into the Minneapolis I35 Bridge Collapse

Finding #21

“The Safety Board therefore concludes that because visual bridge inspections alone, regardless of their frequency, are inadequate to always detect corrosion on gusset plates or to accurately assess the extent or progression of that corrosion, inspectors should employ appropriate nondestructive evaluation technologies when evaluating gusset plates.”

I believe bending this gusset in a vehicle collision intensified the corrosion process and poor inspection allowed this condition to fester. This corrosion is so thick there just in no way to access the metal integrity underneath it. The thickness of the metal plate could be severely degraded and we have no idea if there are cracks developing in the gusset underneath the member damage and severely delaminating rust. This half inch gusset looks like it is an “inch” thick looking at it from the side.

NTSB 2007 Investigation into the Minneapolis I35 Bridge Collapse 

Probable Cause

The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of the collapse of the I-35W bridge in Minneapolis, Minnesota, was the inadequate load capacity, due to a design error by Sverdrup & Parcel and Associates, Inc., of the gusset plates at the U10 nodes, which failed under a combination of (1) substantial increases in the weight of the bridge, which resulted from previous bridge modifications, and (2) the traffic and concentrated construction loads on the bridge on the day of the collapse. Contributing to the design error was the failure of Sverdrup & Parcel’s quality control procedures to ensure that the appropriate main truss gusset plate calculations were performed for the I-35W bridge and the inadequate design review by Federal and State transportation officials.

>>>Contributing to the accident was the generally accepted practice among Federal and State transportation officials of giving inadequate attention to gusset plates during inspections for conditions of distortion, such as bowing, and of excluding gusset plates in load rating analyses.<<<

It doesn’t look like the NHDOT did their mandatory gusset inspection of every similar style bridge coming out of the 2007 NTSB Minneapolis I 35 bridge collapse investigation…

NTSB 2007 Investigation into the Minneapolis I35 Bridge Collapse 

Gusset plate: A metal plate used to unite multiple structural members of a truss.

I believe the ‘Environmental Assessment BRATTLEBORO, VT – HINSDALE, NH TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR BRF 2000(19)SC “ is severely incomplete and has a serious lack of granularity. The Environment Assessment report wasn’t observant enough with truck and car bridge interactions. They are keying off the NHDOT who have falsified their reports and they haven’t done independent evaluations of the structural condition of both bridges.

I will submit to you, there is way more tractor trailers and giant logging tractor trailers trucks than cement trucks.

This is how it should have been stated the truck and car interaction. The local population who crosses these bridges know what I am saying is accurate. Typically only one large semi and no cars can passage critical choke points at the same times. If the assessment is so incomplete with traffic interactions, why isn’t other assessment and analysis incomplete? 

Typically on both entrances of the Brattleboro Bridge, the vast majority of the semis stop before he enters the bridge. He is waiting for all the traffic to clear before he jumps onto the bridge. He is also waiting for a polite vehicle on the other side of the bridge to stop before enters the bridge. At multiple points, his cab has to jump into the opposing traffic lane so he can get his big butt “way back there” to make it around the protruding corner of the bridge. It take him many feet to get his big rig straighten out on the bridge.  A lot of these semis once on the bridge ride in the middle of bridge straddling both lanes. He doesn’t want anyone on the bridge with him. Then he has to put his cab in the opposing traffic lane so his butt “way back there” will be able to make it around the corner. The sides of the bridge have drastically inadequate height…he could damage the trailer and bridge because the trailer is too high if he drive too close to the outside of the road. He drives in both lanes of traffic so his trailer won’t be damaged.  So that is another reason these semis take up the two lanes of this two lane bridge. They even do that on the Hinsdale Bridge even with no sharp corners and a straight approach in both directions. Even small trucks and the semis know the small truck can’t be on the bridge with the semi.

You can see the guard railing damage on both sides of the bridge when a semi driver misjudges this maneuver…it happens a lot.

I am saying this report severely minimizes the truck traffic and car problems with their passage through the critical choke points on the Hinsdale Route 119 bridges. They just weren’t very observant with their reporting. They are severely downplaying the condition of the bridge.

Environmental Assessment

“Simultaneous passage of two large trucks at this curve, and on the bridges, is difficult.”

We are in a Town and locale emergency…it is a huge emergency. This report doesn’t state that clearly. We could lose the bridge at any moment…get draconian vehicle restrictions in the next second…lose lives in a bridge collapse.  These could hurt tens of thousands of people and many businesses. We are in a state NHDOT hurricane Katrina or Superstorm Sandy emergency…our New Hampshire state government has caught on fire and nobody has called 911 and the fire department yet.   

I am available to give tours explaining my pictures…especially for executives and engineers with the NHDOT, any government officials and the media. I will teach you a lot.  You should bring Dramamine and wear old jeans. Some areas would need you to be a little gutsy and you shouldn’t be too afraid of heights. Just give me a call or throw me email.

Mike Mulligan, Hinsdale, NH

1-603-336-8320

steamshovel2002@yahoo.com   

I was the instigator of one of the largest fraud criminal cases in the State of New Hampshire ($500 million -$600 million dollars and many people going to jail). 

God only gives me the impossible cases….the problems everyone has given up on. They bring me into a problem when all hope is lost. I take the cases nobody else will touch. I am the prince of the improbable and the impossibility.

 
Sincerely,

 

 
Mike Mulligan
PO 161
Hinsdale, NH