Tuesday, October 13, 2015

FitzPatrick Has Much Worst Market Conditions Than Pilgrim???

Just think about it, events in the last few months are focusing a high intensity laser light at Entergy? Will their credibility stand up to the intense scrutiny?
"The Central New York wholesale market is "even more challenging'' than the New England market where Pilgrim is struggling, Entergy officials said." 
Owner of FitzPatrick nuclear plant to close Pilgrim plant near Boston

Entergy Corp. announced today that it will close Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station in Plymouth, Mass., no later than June 1, 2019, because of poor market conditions, reduced revenues and increased operational costs. 
The announcement increased the anxiety in Oswego County, where Entergy has said it will decide by the end of this month whether to close the FitzPatrick plant in Scriba.
Pilgrim is expected to lose between $10 million and $30 million in each of 2015, 2016 and 2017, Entergy said. 
The Massachusetts plant faces many of the same challenges that could lead Entergy to close FitzPatrick, notably low power prices driven by abundant natural gas. In addition, the Pilgrim facility faced the likelihood of costly safety-related improvements because of heightened oversight from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Entergy officials today said the improvements were likely to cost at least $45 million to $60 million. 
The Central New York wholesale market is "even more challenging'' than the New England market where Pilgrim is struggling, Entergy officials said. 
"FitzPatrick, like Pilgrim, is a marginal unit located in an even more challenging wholesale power market,'' Entergy said today. "We are considering whether to proceed with (FitzPatrick's) next scheduled refueling outage. That decision will be made around the end of this month.'' 
Oswego County officials are worried about the effect closing FitzPatrick would have on the local economy, where the nuclear plant likely generates about $500 million of activity per year, according to estimates from similar facilities. FitzPatrick's payroll of $74 million is one of the area's largest. 
Amid all the uncertainty, union employees at FitzPatrick will vote Wednesday on a new, multi-year contract proposal, said Ted Skerpon, president of Local 97 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers. 
Skerpon would not provide details of the proposal, but said he does not believe the union contract is a key factor in Entergy's decision about the future of FitzPatrick.

Pilgrim Closing: Nuclear Street Closing. (Declaring War On Liberals)

Basically Entergy declared war on liberal Massachusetts and their Republican Governor Baker.
Entergy To Shut Down Pilgrim NPP In Massachusetts Rate This Nuclear Street News
Tue, Oct 13 2015 2:21 PM
Entergy Corporation, one of the largest energy companies in the United States, said Tuesday it would close down the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant in Plymouth, Mass., by June 1, 2019, citing economic factors. 
The decision to close Pilgrim 1, a General Electric Type 3 boiling water reactor with a viable operating license that expires June 8, 2032, was based on a number of financial factors, Entergy said. Most pointedly, the company pointed to low current and forecast wholesale energy prices brought about by record low natural gas prices, driven by shale gas production. This has significantly impacted the nuclear power station's revenues, said Entergy, which, as a whole, has annual revenues of about $12 billion. 
Do you think this only applies to Entergy??? 
The company also said “policy-related issues” have eroded wholesale energy prices with current and forecast power prices down about $10 per megawatt hour. This represents an annual loss of more than $40 million in revenues for Pilgrim, Entergy said. 
The company pointed out “design flaws” in the energy market that do not compensate nuclear power plants for providing carbon-free, large-scale 24/7 energy generation and onsite fuel storage. Entergy also blamed “unfavorable state energy proposals that subsidize renewable energy resources at the expense of Pilgrim and other plants.” There is also a proposal in the state that could hurt the nuclear plant financially, as it would provide above-market prices to utilities in Canada for hydro power representing about 33 percent of the state's electricity demand. Another detrimental factor is a recent state order that would further lower the price of natural gas and increase the region's reliance on it. 
Entergy's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Leo Denault called the decision to shutter Pilgrim “incredibly difficult … because of the effect on our employees and the communities in which they work and live.” 
In addition, the company pointed out that it had invested hundreds of millions of dollars to improve Pilgrim's safety, as well as its reliability and security. In turn, they company is faced with increased operating costs and enhanced Nuclear Regulatory Commission oversight.
Entergy said it predicted closing the plant would have a “neutral to positive” effect on cash flow through 2020, depending on uncertainty about the shutdown date, the plant's capacity supply obligation and costs related to the NRC's recent placement of Pilgrim in Column 4 of the Reactor Oversight Process Action Matrix. 
After shutdown, Pilgrim will transition to decommissioning. The Pilgrim nuclear decommissioning trust had a balance of approximately $870 million as of Sept. 30, 2015, representing excess financial assurance of approximately $240 million for license termination activities above NRC-required assurance levels. Filings with the NRC for planned shutdown activities will determine whether any other financial assurance may be required and will specifically address funding for spent fuel management, which will be required until the federal government takes possession of the fuel and removes it from the site, per its current obligation.

Currently, no additional funding is anticipated, Entergy said.

Pilgrim Nuclear Plant to Close in June 2019

The NRC should now order Pilgrim to shutdown!!!
What is going to happen to Fitzpatrick? 
As I've talked about, as VY was dying, the agency withdrew inspection services from Pilgrim. They worried Pilgrim was going to catch the VY disease.  Entergy didn't put in enough resources into Pilgrim, this caused the plant to wildly spin out of operational control. All  the attention to Pilgrim's operational problems forced the NRC into enforcing their weak regulations. Personally I think the nuclear industry is worried about all this attention ending in reforming the NRC. 

All bets are off if the republicans recapture the presidency. One wonders how the nuclear industry teabaggers will blame the NRC for forcing Entergy to close Pilgrim?

By the way, they can shutdown whenever they want independent to the NEISO. They will just be required to pay for replacement power.  

Station first opened in 1972
By David Abel Globe Staff  October 13, 2015
The company that owns Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station said Tuesday morning that it plans to close the 43-year-old plant in Plymouth. 
The company said in a statement it will close the plant no later than June 2019. 
“The decision to close Pilgrim was incredibly difficult because of the effect on our employees and the communities in which they work and live,” Leo Denault, Entergy’s chairman and chief executive officer, said in a statement.
However, Denault said, “market conditions and increased costs led us to reluctantly conclude that we had no option other than to shut down the plant.” 
Company officials plan to hold a press conference at noon Tuesday in Plymouth. 
The decision comes about a month after the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission downgraded the plant’s safety rating. Pilgrim and two reactors in Arkansas are now considered the least safe in the country. 
The repairs needed to improve Pilgrim’s safety rating would have likely cost tens of millions of dollars for Entergy Corp., a Louisiana-based energy conglomerate that has owned Pilgrim since 1999. Pilgrim was already facing rising costs, declining revenues, and an energy market increasingly inhospitable to nuclear power. 
The decision will have a significant impact on the town of Plymouth as well as the region. The plant employs about 600 people and provides the South Shore town with $10 million a year and other financial benefits. 
The closure of the plant could make it significantly harder to meet the state’s goals of cutting its carbon emissions 25 percent below 1990 levels by 2020 and 80 percent below by 2050. 
Pilgrim supplies an average of about 5 percent of the region’s energy, and the 680-megawatt plant accounts for about 84 percent of the state’s non-carbon emitting energy.
Plant officials said they will have to continue operating the plant until 2019 because of agreements they have with ISO New England, the grid that supplies energy to the region. The plant could possibly close earlier if Entergy contracts with another power plant to replace the power that would have come from Pilgrim.

Pilgrim Heater: "I'll gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today".

Popeye’s J. Wellington Wimpy "I'll gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today".


Why pay the price of a plant shutdown...a proper refueling outage when you can put off maintenance today for maintenance in the distant future.
This condition resulted in the development of a susceptible condition resulting in a failure by shell leakage of the heater during operation on August 15, 2014.
Come on, if the NRC and Entergy were competent, they would have replaced this heater in the prior refueling outage. What they all proved to us is they have zero capability to predict a heater failure and its erosion.
Dates: April 1, 2015 through June 30, 2015
August 11, 2015






Annual Sample: Through-wall Leak of Feedwater Heater Shell E-103B


a.    Inspection Scope


b.     


The inspectors performed a review of Entergy’s root cause evaluation and corrective actions associated with CR-2014-4052. The inspectors assessed the problem identification threshold, extent of condition reviews, and the prioritization and timeliness of corrective actions to determine whether Entergy personnel were appropriately identifying, characterizing, and correcting problems associated with the history of the erosion/corrosion of numerous locations of the E-103B feedwater heater shell.


Specifically, feedwater heater E-103B has a history of shell erosion/corrosion issues. Since 1999, these issues have been resolved by a series of repairs and evaluations performed as needed to extend the replacement date of the heater. The Flow Accelerated Corrosion Program has measured and monitored the thickness of portions of the shell since 1999. No tubes have been plugged (removed from service) since heater installation in 1984. Feedwater heater E-103B was removed and replaced during the current refuel outage (RFO 20) with an identical heater procured without modification or change to original specifications. The replacement feedwater heater was procured for a planned replacement due to the continued degradation and resultant leaks in the shell.

The inspectors assessed Entergy’s problem identification threshold, cause analyses, extent of condition reviews, compensatory actions, and the prioritization and timeliness of Entergy’s corrective actions to determine whether Entergy staff were appropriately, identifying, characterizing, and correcting problems associated with this issue and, whether the planned and/or completed corrective actions were appropriate. The inspectors took note that the feedwater heater while being risk significant is not a safety-related component. However, the feedwater heater was designed and fabricated to the requirements of ASME Section VIII. In addition, the inspectors interviewed responsible engineering personnel to assess the effectiveness of the implemented corrective actions.
b. Findings and Observations
No findings were identified.
The direct cause of the shell leaks was erosion of shell base metal and penetration in areas around the shell structural stiffeners until those areas could no longer carry the required loads. The inspectors reviewed test records of ultrasonic thickness readings acquired to support that wall thickness met the acceptance levels contained in engineering documents. However, wall thinning and loss of adjacent structural support to the shell and stiffeners continued.
The inspectors reviewed Entergy’s causal evaluation that identified the likely causes of the failure, including the degradation by corrosion of the shell in numerous area locations and in the areas of shell structural support. This condition resulted in the development of a susceptible condition resulting in a failure by shell leakage of the heater during operation on August 15, 2014. The inspectors noted that a replacement for the E-103B heater had been purchased and placed into storage in 2000.
The inspectors confirmed the critical parameters were being tracked and included appropriate alert and action levels when wall thinning decreased to a “t-critical” level. This wall thickness provides design margin with an inclusive allowance such that action is taken prior to actual encroachment on the design minimum allowable wall thickness.
The inspectors also reviewed a selection of sample locations where the highest wear rates have been detected in heater wall thickness monitoring plans. The inspectors interviewed engineering staff and reviewed test data to verify that monitoring and trending of wear data was measured and evaluated by engineering personnel.
The inspectors reviewed a selection of test data for various components and did not identify any additional issues. The inspectors determined Entergy’s overall response to this issue was commensurate with the safety significance, was timely, and included reasonable compensatory actions. The inspectors concluded that actions completed were reasonable to correct the problem and prevent reoccurrence.


Friday, October 09, 2015

Ameren Hires New Nuclear Expert For Board?


They know Callaway is in big trouble. This guy is going to be bored being in a corporation with just one nuclear plant.

***Opdated 10/10: This is the collective nuclear industry trying to bail out Callaway and Ameren. They are loading up their firearms for battle on the regulatory and political battlefields. Don't you institutional investors and others bail out of us yet with a quarterly 4% increase cash dividends. That is a whopping more than 16% increase in cash dividends per year. This is called doing artificial respiration on the price of their stock!
LOUIS, Oct. 9, 2015 /PRNewswire/ -- The board of directors of Ameren Corporation (NYSE: AEE) announced today that Rafael Flores, senior vice president and chief nuclear officer of Luminant, has been elected to the Ameren board of directors effective Nov. 1.  Luminant is the largest generator of electricity in Texas, operating coal, nuclear and natural-gas power plants, and is a subsidiary of Energy Future Holdings Corporation.
Flores has served as senior vice president and chief nuclear officer of Luminant since March 2009, and in various other capacities with the company and its predecessors since 1983.  His responsibilities include overseeing operations of the Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant in Texas and representing Luminant with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, the Nuclear Energy Institute and on various committees and working groups in the nuclear industry.  Flores has announced his retirement from Luminant effective Dec. 31…

Callaway Junk: Poor Rules for Event Reporting

This is the preceding July 24 shutdown and MFP trip. It is a horror show. What caused the feedwater booms...the water hammer after no feedwater. Usually this is leaking containment check valves.  

Think about it...coming on to this LER is 5 years. The document  doesn't cue you into the NRC flipped this event into special inspection and problems associated with systemic problems with all four discharge flow control valves. I call it as federal falsification with not reporting this in this document.   

Basically their is very little oversight with LER public reporting and the industry has forced the NRC into writing skimpy LER rules for reporting.

It just bothers me, the industry just operates collectively to the minimum intent of the regulatory requirements. The professional are just rule and procedure automaton without any intent of thinking and acting in a holistic manner.

I am just saying Callaway is starved for founding and the problems at this one-off plant are overwhelming everyone. 

***This event was caused by the inadvertent inclusion of jumpers in the current transformer (CT) circuits of the main transformers that were installed as part of Main Transformer Replacement Modification 09-0044 implemented in Refuel 19. following the event, the inadvertently placed CT jumpers were removed and the plant was successfully restarted.

***The reactor trip was uncomplicated, as systems responded as expected. This included satisfactory operation of the Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump (TDAFP), which provided flow to all four steam generators. For the “B” Motor Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump (MDAFP), discharge flow control valve ALHV0007(MDAFP Bto S/G A HV) initially responded as required (i.e., closed on demand). However, in response to a subsequent demand to open the valve, the valve remained closed and could not be manipulated from the control room using ALHK0007A, SG A MD AFP AFW CTRL. ALHV0007 was declared inoperable, and Condition C of Technical Specification (TS) 3.7.5, “Auxiliary feedwater (AfW) System”, was entered for the inoperable ‘B’ MDAFP train. An Operating Technician (01) was dispatched to the valve, and the valve was manipulated locally by turning its handwheel. The valve was repaired prior to the end of the TS 72-hour Completion Time for Required Action C.1. Inoperability of this valve did not prevent the delivery of adequate auxiliary feedwater flow to the steam generators.

Thursday, October 08, 2015

Pilgrim's Junk Feedwater Heaters

10/9
They must have fixed it, back up to 100%. I like they disclosed it. 

I missed this in the morning report. Somebody made a good catch!
Pilgrim nuclear plant lowers power amid heater issue 
By Patriot Ledger
Posted Oct. 8, 2015 at 12:58 PM
Updated at 1:00 PM


PLYMOUTH - The operator of the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station has lowered the plant’s power to 95 percent as officials investigate an issue with a feed water heater.

Laura Burm, a spokeswoman for plant operator Entergy, said crews lowered the power level Wednesday night after detecting an unexpected level change in the heater. She said the plant's power would remain at that level while crews investigate and correct the issue.
Basically NRC's Sheehan is saying employee safety is not a concern to the NRC. Isn't it the NRC job to back up their brother employees' safety. Basically OSHA has a hands off agreement with the nuke plants NRC...it is the lead agency's (NRC) responsibility to be the eyes and ears of OSHA.
Posted Oct. 8, 2015 at 12:58 PM
Updated at 2:23 PM

PLYMOUTH - The operator of the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station lowered the plant’s power to 95 percent Wednesday night as officials investigated an issue with a water heater.
 
Laura Burm, a spokeswoman for plant operator Entergy, said crews lowered the power level after detecting an unexpected level change in one of the plant's feed water heaters, which are used to reheat water that has been cooled after passing through the turbine as steam. She said the plant's power would remain at that level while crews investigate and correct the problem.

Neil Sheehan, a spokesman for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, said the heater issue relates to power production at the plant and did not present a safety concern.

What Is My Definition of Teabagger?

Somebody e-mailed me saying they don't know what a teabagger is. It was a stupid newspaper reporter.
Somebody who can put both human testicles inside his mouth at the same time : )

The NRC just put up a NRC blog entry in support of my teabagger position. Explaining the value of research reactors.

It is a vulgar euphemism for people who side with or belong to the tea party.  Basically government disruptors… extremist libertarian like mided people without a conscience out to disrupt and destroy government for fun. I consider them all national security terrorist.
 

Examining the Reasons for Ending the Cancer Risk Study
Here are political senatorial terrorist trying to disrupt and destroy government (NRC) I just illuminated on the NRC blog. 
Me on the NRC's Blog: “I believe the pressures to not do the radiation study comes from the congressional anti-government regulatory disruptors. These concentrated forces are severely disrupting plant NRC oversight and it is only going to get worst if the House and Senate are taken over by the extremist government hating forces. As the recent senate NRC budget hearing highlighted, if the inept NRC (Sen. Inhofe) can’t keep tract of federal spending documentation on $91 million dollars worth of reactor research, (me) do you think the documentation on plant oversight is any better? I keep thinking about the Pilgrim recent daily event report with the NRC missing the 1992 information notice on fire protection wire hot short issue.”

Nuclear Senate Oversight Hearing: The Seeds Of Widespread Government Disruption

This government teabagger disruption strategy is coming to a neighborhood near you. They are going to cut the NRC's budget in half or defund it entirely before this is over. Can't you hear them: lets privatized the NRC.   

This is what the nation is going to look like if the anti- government teabagger factions take over both the House and Senate...anti-govermentalism disruption on a massive scale. At least we got a weak and do nothing democrat as president.  

I agree with my House and Senate extremist anti government libertarians brothers...at the plant oversight level the NRC is very dysfunctional. I seen this over and over again, the general cowardness of the general population. I know through personal contact, most of the NRC officials and NRC inspectors are good people with good hearts. But most of the good people confronted by seemly overpowering force just caves in to the corrupt forces. It just easier to comply, and less risky, to comply with massive corruption. I have always been so disappointed with the good people of the USA, actually all the good people all over the planet, the good people of the NRC is no better than the multitudes. The world doesn't get into the place we are today without the complacency and permission of the good people.

Don't you worry one bit you good NRC employees, you will never disappoint me. When you take that wrong "fork in the road"? You probably took it years ago and don't know it. I seen this so often, I just don't get disappointed anymore. I have adapted to my life's disappointments on massive scale. I wonder how god adapts to disappointments of the living world? Yea, I am just doing my pathetic mother's Irish guilt trip.

Republican legislation planned to revise US NRC's fee system


Washington (Platts)--8 Oct 2015 622 am EDT/1022 GMT

The Republican chairman of the Senate committee that oversees the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission said Wednesday he is developing legislation that would revise the way NRC collects fees from its licensees.

Senator James Inhofe, an Oklahoma Republican, said in his opening statement at a hearing of the Environment and Public Works Committee that the agency's workload has been declining in recent years due in part to less applications for new reactor licenses than had been expected. Inhofe also said despite the fact the US nuclear power industry has spent more than $4 billion on actions taken in response to the Fukushima I accident in Japan, "NRC staff has repeatedly sent proposals to the Commission, which they admit are not safety-significant or cost-justified. I believe this shows the NRC's bureaucracy has grown beyond the size needed to accomplish its mission."

Inhofe also criticized "the NRC's extreme level of corporate overhead costs; reactor oversight spending increasing despite the decline in operating reactors; over-budgeting for new reactors work that no longer exists; and persistent carry-over funds."

Inhofe said he does not "have confidence that the agency will diligently address the need for reform on its own."

"I believe it's time for Congress to step in. I intend to draft legislation to reform the NRC's budget structure and fee collection in an effort to instill fiscal discipline in the agency and ensure that resources are properly focused on safety-significant matters and timely decision-making," he added.

Inhofe did not provide details about what might be included in the legislation, or when it might be introduced.

Asked whether Inhofe has definite plans to introduce such legislation during the current session of Congress, committee spokeswoman Kristina Baum said in an email, "the Chairman is developing legislation on the topic. However, we'll keep you posted in regards to timing."

NRC is required by law to recover 90% of its annual budget from licensee fees. The Nuclear Energy Institute has told the agency several times in recent years, in comments on the annual fee recovery rules, that the US nuclear power industry believes the agency's annual fees are increasing at an excessive rate.

NRC Chairman Stephen Burns and the other three commissioners said during the hearing Wednesday that the agency's ongoing Project Aim 2020 will increase NRC's efficiency and better tailor the size of its staff and budget to the type and amount of work expected in the next few years.

"A central element of the Project Aim effort is the rebaselining process," Burns said in written testimony. "In our direction to staff, my colleagues and I made clear that the focus should be on identifying what work is most important to the safety and security mission of the agency, and what activities can be shed, deprioritized, or performed with a less intense resource commitment."

--Steven Dolley, steven.dolley@platts.com

--Edited by Kevin Saville, kevin.saville@platts.com

Boston Globe On Pilgrim's Fire Protection Lapse.

Updated 10/8

Right, with the newspapers, the NRC and nuclear industry; all you are really getting is the extremely prettified version of events based on the so-called greater interest of the nation.

 Pilgrim plant failed to address 1992 safety advisory

The Pilgrim Nuclear power plant in Plymouth.

By Peter Schworm Globe Staff  October 07, 2015

Operators at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station have acknowledged a longstanding safety lapse after a review of its fire protection system revealed the plant had failed to comply with a government advisory issued in 1992, the latest setback for the Plymouth facility.

On Monday, engineers at the nuclear plant discovered vulnerabilities in two areas that required “fire watches,” where trained personnel monitor sections of the plant for any evidence of a fire. The lapse raised the alarming -- though remote -- possibility that the plant would be unable to
This the problem with the dopey and technically uneducated Boston Globe reporters. They are poorly educated on the operation and management of these nuclear power plants. The have little capability to know if the NRC officials and Entergy officials are telling the whole truth and accurate. Their technical skills just get them to parrot these official. They won't talk to anyone without a professional credential, because basically their too stupid to know even the basics of what is going on. A professional reputation as the all lawyers, know will keep a legal suit away from the newspaper. They are held hostage to the corporate professional class...they assume the like minded professional class are straight shooters.

There just is no evidence where the shorts are coming from with the NRC and Entergy. It is highly unlikely the fire threat comes within the control room. It will come from underneath the control room in the cable spreading room, the cable vault or below that in the 4160 volt switchgear room. It not fire they are worried about in the control room, its suffocation from the smoke, fumes and Freon they are worry about. Usually this is about separation of redundant instrumentation wiring or redundancy of safety grade electrical cables in the cable trays. The cable trays hold up numerous wires snaking throughout the plant. In a fires in the cable trays with redundant component wiring, the insulation burns out and there is shorting in the wiring. It can stop, start pumps, disrupt the involved instrumentation...basically leads to a runaway plant outside the control of the operators in the control room.
Cable trays fires are very hard to put out.

In my days, only water can put them out. They use to teach us over and over again, you might have to put fire water on energized trays in emergencies. There might be up to 4160 or 480 high current volts being shorted out in the cable trays. They tell us, either agree to put water on high voltage shorting cable trays or you can't work in this job. This is highly contrary to the offsite fire fighting training. Wires have to be positively de-energized if in the vicinity with a fire hose and spaying water.
  
So the dimwits Boston Globe statement "fire in its control room" is completely wrong...the BG reporter misheard what the officials were saying. We'll see a inspection report in three months, the details with that. As Donald Trump would say, I am right. 

***So basically we are worry about is fires in the cable vaults, switchgear rooms, and cable trays that snake through the plant for miles. It is a cheap work-around based on a fundimentally defective fire protection design of a plant. It is basically about redundant instrumentation and electrical supply congregating in one location at the plant. If a fire occurs in one of these unbelievable vulnerable area...the idea is to the locally operate equipment important to safety shutdown shutdown the plant. We bypass the control room, the cable vaults, cable separating rooms and cable trays...the whole ball of wax because a fire in a vulnerable area could led to a uncontrollable and runaway nuclear power plant. There generally is very little training and testing on these systems. It is a phony system for public consumption...these systems are just for show.

***After the Browns Ferry fire and TMI, basically the USA came to the conclusion most nuclear plants were of a defective design and dangerous in their current forms. We invented these add on systems to remotely shutdown the plants. These systems were constructed shortly after I arrive at Vermont Yankee in 1980. These half ass and corrupted safety systems have the high potential to corrupt the humans and safety cultures all around them. The employees, managers, officials, utilities, the regulatory agencies and the politicians...the communities all around them for economic reasons.

***When you have to hide problems for survival; lie, cheat and be deceptive just to make a buck and feed your family. It suffocates the human spirit in a broad manner. You see what I mean, when you have lie, cheat and be deceptive for survival, then you have to invent a corrupt enforcement system to keep the human system spinning. It kills the human spirit in a wide manner on both ends: the enforcers and victims. Don't you hear MLK. The whole deal with excessive privacy, secrecy, non-transparency, corrupt enforcement systems and giving a advantage to some and not the others...forced living a human life in shadows. It is a natural corruption systems. It corrupts people and humans by the billions. As Pope Francis tells us with the term: "the god of money"? You people just keep living your shallow lives just for money and security? Don't you people read the bible and listen to the peoples Pope Francis?          

I considers add-on systems as highly dangerous. The plant is not holistically designed. It gives outsiders the illusion the plants are safe. I call these systems papermacha safety systems... safety systems only made in paperwork forms. Basically cheap add on systems not holistically designed in one system, basically systems not thoroughly designed and tested as one system in the beginning of life. It is a safety system inherently with a lot of uncertainties still in the plant. The engineers just hasn't cleared out all the uncertainties. Usually we do this all for money and status.             

All these NRC and Entergy officials know there is a golden hour in public relations and in the news media. Basically a golden hour in hospital emergency care says if you get a serious injured person in the emergency room within the first hour after an injury...most people will survive the serious injury. The golden hour in the public relations and nuclear power plant news, people only listen to the nuclear news in the first 24 hours. The papers are only interested in publishing articles within 24 hours of the event because there after nobody listens.
   
shut down the reactor in the event of a fire in its control room. 

The plant said it will conduct watches “as an additional layer of protection” until the underlying problem is resolved. The plant says it already patrols the areas in question every four hours.

“It had never been properly addressed, for whatever reason,” said Neil Sheehan, a NRC spokesman. “We’re going to have to assess why it took them until now.”

Sheehan said it was not clear why NRC inspectors had never identified the lapse.

“Why this particular area never caught our attention, that’s something we’re going to have to look at, too,” he said.

The revelation, first reported by the Cape Cod Times, follows a downgrade in the plant’s safety rating, raising the prospect that the plant may shut down to avoid millions in required improvements. A series of unplanned shutdowns in recent years, along with substantial safety problems, led to the demotion.

On average, the 43-year-old plant provides about 12 percent of the state’s electricity. It has been run by Entergy Corp. since 1999.

In a statement, Entergy said that the station has established “robust levels of manual and automatic fire detection and suppression in all critical areas.”

Wednesday, October 07, 2015

NRC: Republican Anti-Government Senators Discovers Horrendously Dysfunctional Agency

This got to be going all over the agency and especially within the plants. It is probably why the NRC missed Pilgrims "hot short" issue...with the agency now undergoing investigation with why they NRC missed it. Doesn't the Senate "research budget" documentation general incompetence and NRC confusion wit oversight of Pilgrim sound exactly identical? It the NRC can't keep the documentation of the $91 million dollars in the nuclear research project straight, the object chaos in a senate hearing, maybe the NRC documentation of the plants are just as screwed up...  

Generally these teabaggers Senate and House Republicans are hired hands of the anti-government of the utilities. They can save a few pennies over this to boost their profit. I think this is criminal activity. This is governmental disruption on a massive scale.

Clearly the House and Senate anti government Republicans have begun a war on the NRC. The cheap natural gas has undermined the safety of the nuclear plants and dangerous congressional teabaggers are scapegoating the hapless Nuclear regulatory Commission. This has turned into a national crisis at the intersection of politics and government oversight with dangerous industries. Generally  the democrats are incompetent...the Dems would love to hide in the bushes while the giant nuclear utilities disassemble the NRC alive.

This is a gigantic shadow over the federal agency and the whole culture is effected by the political and corporate intimidation. I bet you this is the test case with how in the future the teabaggers disrupt and destroy government. 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Took 6 Months and 3 Tries To Produce Research Budget-Andrew Follett
Things are moving so slowly at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) that it took nuclear regulators six months and three different attempts to give congressional overseers information they requested on the research budgets of projects. 

The NRC finally did give the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works the information, but it was an incomplete list delivered the night before the commission was set to testify. 

Republican Oklahoma Sen. Inhofe asked the NRC at the Wednesday hearing, “How do you develop a budget and meet your responsibility to be good stewards of taxpayer dollars and license fees if it takes six months and three oversight requests to produce a list of what projects this 91 million dollars will be spent on?” 

NRC Commissioner Stephen Burns replied that the slow response was because of the “responsible” accounting methods the commission uses to compile its list of projects. Burns continued by saying that NRC accounting, however, lacks the ability to “track” the data at the level of individual projects. 

According to Inhofe, “the NRC’s bureaucracy has grown beyond the size needed to accomplish its mission.” The nuclear industry has shrunk in recent years, and the NRC previously accomplished “a lot more work with a lot fewer resources.” 

Currently, the NRC plans to reduce its budget by roughly 10 percent by 2020 while reducing its staff by around 9.5 percent from the current 3,778 to 3,600 by September 2016.

The NRC has seen its budget expand by about 50 percent over the past decade. It predicted a wave of new reactor license requests and a general expansion of the nuclear industry following the applications of 13 different companies to the NRC for licenses to build 25 new nuclear power reactors in the United States between 2007 and 2009.

Changing economic conditions, however, especially low natural gas prices, slow demand growth for electricity, and the Fukushima nuclear disaster ended this “nuclear renaissance” in the United States. This caused a declining interest in the construction of new nuclear plants and as a result the NRC has received 40 percent fewer licensing requests and about half as many license renewal applications, greatly decreasing its work load.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Took 6 Months and 3 Tries To Produce Research Budget-Andrew Follett 
Things are moving so slowly at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) that it took nuclear regulators six months and three different attempts to give congressional overseers information they requested on the research budgets of projects.

The NRC finally did give the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works the information, but it was an incomplete list delivered the night before the commission was set to testify.

Republican Oklahoma Sen. Inhofe asked the NRC at the Wednesday hearing, “How do you develop a budget and meet your responsibility to be good stewards of taxpayer dollars and license fees if it takes six months and three oversight requests to produce a list of what projects this 91 million dollars will be spent on?”

NRC Commissioner Stephen Burns replied that the slow response was because of the “responsible” accounting methods the commission uses to compile its list of projects. Burns continued by saying that NRC accounting, however, lacks the ability to “track” the data at the level of individual projects.

According to Inhofe, “the NRC’s bureaucracy has grown beyond the size needed to accomplish its mission.” The nuclear industry has shrunk in recent years, and the NRC previously accomplished “a lot more work with a lot fewer resources.”

Currently, the NRC plans to reduce its budget by roughly 10 percent by 2020 while reducing its staff by around 9.5 percent from the current 3,778 to 3,600 by September 2016.

The NRC has seen its budget expand by about 50 percent over the past decade. It predicted a wave of new reactor license requests and a general expansion of the nuclear industry following the applications of 13 different companies to the NRC for licenses to build 25 new nuclear power reactors in the United States between 2007 and 2009. 
Changing economic conditions, however, especially low natural gas prices, slow demand growth for electricity, and the Fukushima nuclear disaster ended this “nuclear renaissance” in the United States. This caused a declining interest in the construction of new nuclear plants and as a result the NRC has received 40 percent fewer licensing requests and about half as many license renewal applications, greatly decreasing its work load.




Mesothelioma In Nuclear Plants

I worked with Don Jadloski in the operations department for a decade. I was on his shift for the last years of his life (1992). We spend hours talking about our personal, family, exspeciually car problems on shift. Oh man, we'd talk on and on about car issue and the history of it. We talked on and on about the design of GM cars...I had a expensive one always in the shop.  

It started off as a pain in the back he couldn't get rid of. He went to one doctor after another but nobody could figure it out. He'd get colds much worst than normal and issues of lung infections. Then he got pneumonia. Then Mesothelioma... He always worried about it.

He worked at Oyster Creek when the plant was new. They were having main condenser tube leaks. Somebody came up with the bright idea of dumping asbestos in the inlet of the main condenser. Some of asbestos fibers would get sucked into the tiny holes and close off the leak. Most of the asbestos by the tons went into bay. He dumped tons of this stuff in a mixing tank over many years. It worked kinda good.

I visited him in the hospital in the last week of his life. He had one lung removed two years prior...he kinda thought it was caught. It was just wishful thinking. Then it got into the second one. It is like slowly drowning to death. It is a horrible horrible death. He had two beautiful daughters. He was so proud of them. They went through many boyfriends...they were beautiful. We worked together during the teenage years and marriage years. My kids were much younger. He told me pitifully, the girls always had the upper hand. Don told me his daughters were always in control of the boyfriends. It was total control. It was sickening how slavish the boys and would-be husbands were to his daughters. Both of them! Don smugly would declare, "the young men by the dozens didn't have any dignity at all?

Alabama judge awards $3.5 million in mesothelioma death case involving TVA plant 

By Lucy Berry | lberry@al.com The Huntsville Times
 
on October 06, 2015 at 6:21 PM, updated October 06, 2015 at 6:27 PM
 
The family of a Florence woman who died in 2013 from the lung disease mesothelioma will receive a $3.5 million award for her pain and suffering and medical expenses.
U.S. District Judge Lynwood Smith. (File)
 
Court records dating back to 2012 show Barbara Bobo inhaled secondhand asbestos fibers while laundering her husband's work clothes for more than two decades. Bobo's husband, James, did clean-up work for a period of time after asbestos insulation was installed at the Athens-based Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, which is owned and operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority.
 
James Bobo, who began working for the plant in 1975, died of asbestos-induced lung cancer in 1997. His wife was diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma, a rare lung cancer caused by asbestos exposure, in November 2011.
 
Judge Lynwood Smith of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama last week issued a judgment in favor of Melissa Ann Bobo and Shannon Jean Bobo Cox, Bobo's daughters and the co-personal representatives of her estate.
 
Dallas attorney Jay Stuemke, of Simon Greenstone Panatier Bartlett, PC, said Smith found Browns Ferry violated worker safety regulations set by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), as well as its own safeguards.
 
"This didn't have to happen," said Stuemke, who represents the family. "If the TVA had simply followed the law and its own guidelines, these two people might still be alive."
 
TVA spokeswoman Kristine Shattuck-Cooper said in an emailed statement the corporation is reviewing the Court's opinion and evaluating its options.
 
Bobo underwent surgery after her 2011 diagnosis to remove the lining in her affected lung. She also received chemotherapy treatments, which Simon Greenstone Panatier Bartlett, PC, said were painful and resulted in adverse side effects.
 
Court documents say Bobo, who was never an employee or contractor of TVA and was never physically inside the plant, would shake out her husband's work clothes in her home washroom, causing dust to disperse into the air. She would clean the floors of the washroom with a broom and dustpan, creating airborne dust she breathed.
 
A February filing said Bobo also had non-occupational exposure to asbestos from 1965-1975 when her husband worked as a machine operator for the Alabama Wire Plant in Florence. Additionally, she was exposed to asbestos during her years working as a beautician in Florence.