Tuesday, June 17, 2014

July 2013: State of Emergency in Hinsdale NH Over Route 119 Bridge

July 23, 2013
State of Emergency in Hinsdale NH over Route 119 Bridge

Dear Loriella Babkirk,

What a pretty first name!

 I received a copy of your e-mail titled "RE: Brattleboro/ Hinsdale Bridge" dated July 8, 2013 a few days ago. The documents were placed anonymously on the open front seat of my car at the approach of the Route 119 Brattleboro. Actually, I got the Vermont and NH state DOT officials’ response to youy letter also with all the attachments. You haven’t seen the truth in these official state responses and their documents.

By the way, could somebody send me through e-mail those NHDOT bridge inspection reports and photos stated in the attachments please…the five attachments?

You know, everyone’s got to start buckling up here right now. This ride is going to get goddamn rough.

I am the guy at the Route 119 Hinsdale bridges blessing you and everyone else who passes this area. Have you recently seen me dressed up with my nice halo as a bridge safety angel? I am warning all of the lands with an impending bridge collapse or closure in the near future. It is going to be an economic, individual and multi community catastrophe.
As you know, I have spent considerable time at the bridge this year. This is my third year working on this project. I am the talk of the town in Hinsdale...mostly positive and a few even threatening harm to me. Most of Hinsdale thinks I have really gone overboard with my halo and blue angel get-up. Pictures of pathetic me wearing a halo are on my blog! See pictures on my blog!

I would consider our grossly technically obsolete 1921 and dangerously degraded bridge…engineers language… being a “super fracture critical” bridge! The collapsed I35 Minneapolis Bridge was built in 1964 and the I-5 Skagit River Bridge was built in 1955. The Hinsdale/Brattleboro Bridges were built in 1921. The Concord, NH Sewalls Falls road bridge five miles north of Concord, NH was built in 1915. This is the future of our bridge.   

NTSB 2007 Investigation into the Minneapolis I35 Bridge Collapse 

“NTSB findings:

Because the deck truss portion of the I-35W bridge was non-load-path redundant, the total collapse of the deck truss was likely once the gusset plates at the U10 nodes failed.

Non-load-path-redundant: The condition where fracture of an individual structural element (a fracture-critical element) could lead to a partial or total collapse of the entire bridge. A bridge that is non-load-path-redundant is not inherently unsafe, but it does lack redundancy in the design of its support structure. Such bridges are sometimes referred to as fracture critical. The I-35W bridge was of a non-load-path-redundant design.”

I will speak plainly to you. I think the NH bridge inspection process is severely corrupted. The NHDOT roads and bridges budget has been severely restrained for many years now. NH got a huge back log of projects. We are never going to catch up to our responsibilities.  They don't have enough money to keep the 1921 Hinsdale Bridge functional and up to date with maintenance considering the growth of traffic and large trucks. So these guys just close their eyes to Hinsdale. The NHDOT fear the enormous political fallout if they are forced to restrict flow of the traffic or close the bridge. NHDOT fears more the approximate $35 million dollar cost with the replacement bridge.

New Hampshire and their NHDOT are in existentialism’s vice between money limitations and vital societal pubic needs. It ends up as a disproportional war against small town and rural New Hampshire from the powerful well-heeled and high population areas. An unfair and severely unsafe proportion of the NHDOT budgets (and stimulus) has been going to the powerful well healed Concord, Nashua and our NH golden seacoast corridor triangle. This is Boston’s exurbia bedroom community within New Hampshire. That blood sucking sound you hear is all the big southeast NH transportation projects stealing our hopes and dreams from us…the jobs and transportation resources from rural NH.

Our Route 119 Hinsdale/Brattleboro Bridge is tragically obsolete and fracture critical. I keep thinking about the disgusting bent, corroded gusset and the deeply displaced vertical member caused by a vehicle crash on our bridge. How  come that wasn’t ever repaired. This indicates a profound agency attitude with valuing human life and infrastructure engineering integrity.

“I-5 Bridge listed as 'fracture critical”

Columbia River span could collapse if hit with big enough blow

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

Both spans of the Interstate 5 Bridge over the Columbia River are considered "fracture critical" by the Oregon Department of Transportation, meaning if one crucial part of the bridge sustains a big enough blow, the bridge could collapse.

 In it, the I-5 Columbia River Bridge is categorized as a bridge without safety redundancies or backups that would prevent it from collapsing if part of a bridge truss is damaged or removed.

"If one of the fracture-critical pieces is somehow taken out, removed or fails in some way, the whole bridge could collapse," Oregon transportation spokesman Don Hamilton said Tuesday. He declined to specify where the bridge would need to be damaged in order to collapse, because he didn't want to make the bridge's weak spots public.

It is the absence of our tiny voice within New Hampshire government with how we control the arterial life blood flow within little Hinsdale and all of the small town and rural New Hampshire. And our tiny voice stands up for the efficiency of traffic flow and safety for our surrounding communities and bordering states. The majority of the flow of traffic on Hinsdale’s route 119 is not our town’s people. This itty bitty voice in the wilderness is sticking up for the safety interest of the multitudes. They all come from far and wide for passage through our town or to see our little rendition of heaven. 

I am saying, who is going to oversee and regulate the state bridge inspectors?  Who is going to inspect the NH bridge inspectors? I wouldn’t be surprised after reading the 2007 NTSB’s Minneapolis I35 bridge report if knowingly grossly inaccurate and falsified state and federal documents are legal in New Hampshire. You know, the privilege of kings with total unaccountability. This is a fundamental flaw with our nation. We don’t have one highway and road standard, seeing how we send many million dollars to the states. Our federal system should have stick oversight of the State Dots. As an example, just look at the I-35 Minneapolis bridge collapse. There was many known long term flaws in bridge maintenance and state DOT engineering codes. Who is going to step in if the states don’t give a shit?      

So the easy way out of this political mess is to falsify bridge inspections and state and federal documents. The NHDOT staff and officials of NHDOT are severely demoralized, underpaid and intimidated by severely underfunded and highly politicalized agency state budgets. The NHDOT employees are all facing massive and unprecedented employee, personal and official layoffs and firings in the next two years. The organizations are a "black hole" with withholding information and selective truth telling for political, personal and career protection. Just give them the minimum transparency, boys…for our protection. This is black hole organization is beyond the control of any entity on the planet because of their self-interested selective truth-telling, lying and object and uncontested NH and federal illegal document falsification.

So below article is an analogy for similar cultures and systems across many organizations.  Who plays the roles of the patients, the doctors, the medical employees and the medical establishment and the bureaucracy in our system of bridges, towns, employees, voters/taxpayers/ public, the feds, state DOT  and our wider transportation system. If the NHDOT respects their professional employees more will Hinsdale town’s people be more secure and safe? At least the citizens of Hinsdale would have a lot more accurate information to engage our state politicians. Of course, our state government never operates on the facts. Is the sick patient the Hinsdale Route 119 Bridge or is it all the people and businesses who use our bridges?   

Why is government always hiding in the deep shadows?

Where is the respect of us and why is it lacking in in our wider culture and system? I bet you it’s all related to greed and economic insecurity? 

“In a Culture of Disrespect, Patients Lose Out” (NYT)

I’ve always thought about respect as common decency, something we should do because it’s simply the right thing to do. In the medical world, we certainly need to strive for respectful behavior, especially given our historically rigid pecking order, our ingrained traditions of hierarchical bullying and, of course, a primary constituency — patients — who are often on uniquely vulnerable footing.

 But then I stumbled across two articles in Academic Medicine that talked about respect as an issue of patient safety. The authors, a group of doctors and researchers at Harvard Medical School, outlined the myriad acts of disrespect that we’ve come to accept as a way of life in medicine, and showed how these can lead to a final pathway of harm to our patients.

This shift in perspective was a shock to the system. When we tolerate a culture of disrespect, we aren’t just being insensitive, or obtuse, or lazy, or enabling. We’re in fact violating the first commandment of medicine. How can we stand idly by when our casual acceptance of disrespect is causing the same harm to our patients as medication errors, surgical mistakes, handoff lapses and missed lab results?

… Though these annoyances may seem trivial,  this lack of respect “undermines morale, and inhibits transparency and feedback,” the authors write. Morale, transparency and feedback are pillars of preventing medical error. Patients ultimately bear the brunt of this unhealthy atmosphere.

…Added to the clarion call should be patient safety. The connection between disrespectful behavior to patient safety should be made explicit in our efforts, since this is a rallying point that everyone can agree on. Medical staff members should absolutely be holding ourselves to the highest bar of professional and respectful conduct. We have no excuses for anything less. But beyond this, the medical system needs to re-evaluate itself and the way it respects — or disrespects — its own workers, and by extension, its patients.

We are still trying to figure out what this NHDOT scientific and engineering phrase means. A lead “bridge inspector” told us this. He was performing a bridge inspection this spring. We got pictures...see my blog. He told us his group was just "corn cobbing" these bridges. What does "corn cobbing" a bridge inspection mean? This is such obscene disrespect to concerned members of the public.

So this is my blog: "The Poppervillve Town Hall”.
 
Don't forget to click on my other articles and links in my blog...I pictured up most of the underneath of the Route 119 Brattleboro and Hinsdale bridge. Scroll down to look at all of my bridge pictures...you won't be able to stop. These are dangerously obscene pictures of the structures of the bridge.

The Vermont DOT officials might recognize my name. I took pictures of their I 91 (between exit 1 and 2) “William Street" interstate bridge in early 2007. See my pictures of this now demolished bridge under steamshovel2002 and Flickr. Those bridge piers were in dangerously and atrocious conditions. This rather new 1960 (smile) bridge was functionally obsolete. The I91 Interstate Bridge was dangerously narrow and didn’t have safety breakdown lanes like Hinsdale’s route 119 bridges.

Do you remember a tractor trailer who was trying to miss a skidded and stalled car on the Williams Street Bridge? The semi tried to skid around the stalled car on the north bound bridge. Instead, he went right through the bridge railings like tissue paper to his death. I renamed that bridge the Vermont “Daddy Killer Bridge” because the driver had young kids. What shall I name the Hinsdale Route 119 Bridges?

I thinking “The Route 119 Hinsdale, NH Family Killer Bridges“. I could make this a sign and plaster the bridges with it.

I forced Vermont into the replacement of these bridges and many blame me with a rethink on the conditions of all I 91 bridges. This demolished young (humor) bridge was built in the early 1960 and the new bridges are 1000 times more gorgeous than the dead headed baby boomer bridge when we were developing our Interstate system.   

Man, I am in love with those new huge concrete piers holding the new Brattleboro "William Street" bridge. You know, those NJ style integral to the bridge concrete safety barriers will certainly contain any fully loaded tractor trailer. The Vermont DOT official knows what i mean. Mr. Mike Hedges of the VTDOT, you tell the NHDOT how powerful my pictures are. They are going bend to my will!

So here is my list of safety and economic concerns with the Route 119 Hinsdale bridges. They are all pictured up on my blog. If any of these issues are missing and not explained in detail in the past NHDOT inspection reports this is “prima facia” evidence there is massive NHDOT bridge fraud and falsification of paperwork throughout the state. It is NHDOT bridge illegal paperwork falsification to meet a political and self-interested ends? My experience with organizational lying and fraud…it doesn’t happen in one spot in the organizations. The rot is in everything in the organization and in related organizations.   

1)   A few days ago I was on the Brattleboro side of the Route 119 Bridge and standing directly across from the new Whetstone Station restaurant. I had my halo on and was dressed up as a blue angel warning everyone of an impending bridge collapse. Dave, the owner of the restaurant walked over to me. I thought he was irked that I was scaring away his customers. He has a large bar with huge windows facing my protest area on the Hinsdale side of the bridge. Seems, they were watching me. These huge picture windows have a gorgeous elevated view of the Connecticut River and Wantastiquet Mountain. I asked him if I am chasing away your customers. He said not at all. I explained I am trying to replace this bridge. Dave said I am totally on your side. Then he asked me, “Did you hear about the recent serious bicycling accident on the bridge walkway?”

The bridge wooden walkway has many loose and warped planks. It is much worse than last year. As a bicyclist was crossing the bridge walkway, his tire flipped up a loose plank. He did an Endo…flipped over the handle bars on the bridge. He crashed into the railing banging his head and breaking his shoulders. He was almost thrown into the river. He was stunned. Dave called the ambulance. The bicyclist said he would have been dead if he was flipped into the river.

So this spring I was interviewing my NHDOT “corn cobbling” lead bridge inspector buddy. I got pictures of this…see my blog. I said at one point, you guys got big problems with the bridge walkway wooden planks. Most of the planks are loose and many warping. It is getting worst. Some planks are warping where the middle is sticking up and many are warping where one end sticks way up in the air. He told me, “the iron metal structure that attaches the planks by screws to the bride is too corroded to accept the screws.” “It is all just rust down there and all the screws just spin.” You got to wonder will the wooden walkway collapse into the river someday. I told “Mr Corn cobbing bridge inspector” (2013), you know, we got many disabled people with motorized wheelchairs traveling this walkway. They complain to me about the plank bumps and the not snow blowed walkways in the winter? They mostly go the convenience store in the old Wal-Mart store.  


“These bridges have an increasing diabetic rotting wasting disease…”

“The bridge underneath looks like this diabetic's rotting legs and bridge's rotting railings and beams.”

“There is a lot of grass over-growth into the middle of the sidewalk that rubs onto his wheelchair and face. Robert worries a piece of metal will get pulled out into the walkway and then he not sees it. It cuts his leg and then he can't control the infection, or the cut won't heal. Then they have to cut off the leg. A fallen down branch could be hidden in the overgrown grass onto the sidewalk...again he is at extreme risk with losing a limb if it cuts or bruises him. This could easily put him in the grave.”

“The little spin in his wheel chair is one of the few freedoms Robert has.”

“He has had his family fixing the ruts (sidewalk) in this asphalt sidewalk.” (So his wheelchair wouldn’t fall over or make him stuck in place.)

…“Here is Robert right to your face (Sept 24, 2012). You notice the decaying bridge wood walkway planking under his wheelchair...many loose and warped big time.”

Note: My blog and my picture (fall 2012) of Robert’s diabetic leg and the rotting bridge railing made the NHDOT fix the cancerous railing in the 2013 spring inspection. May god have mercy on all our runaway monstrous Frankenstein New Hampshire souls? You see the rotting wooden planks under the rotting railing and this poor man’s wheelchair. They completely ignored the dangerous wooden planks and the screws that wouldn’t catch. This unsafe walkway are well known to NHDOT for many years.

Hinsdale use to remove the snow from the walkway with their special sidewalk plowing vehicle. They stopped because Hinsdale figured out the machine was too heavy for the walkway and  it was also scraping up the loose wooded planks. Why can’t they drive down the road with a snow blower in a pickup? Why can’t the state pay Hinsdale to snow blow the state walkway? How come the bridge walkway doesn’t get snow plowed in the winter? I get it, money, money, money!

You know what I am really trying do here; I am trying to save the soul of the state of New Hampshire!

You see the New Hampshire monstrous disregard for the value of human life with the Route 119 Hinsdale/ Brattleboro bridge walkway issue. Let’s role play the NHDOT District 4 Engineer’s job. Did you see his pathetically poverty stricken and isolated list of small towns in his area. One can only imagine the magnitude the long list of backlogged transportation jobs for his District. I wonder what the criteria is for shoving out NHDOT projects in his district? I bet it is political and population density!

So the Hinsdale Route 119 bridge walkways come to his attention. They are in unsafe condition. He knows he just can’t put screws into the rotting wooden planks. They pop that baby open and he knows it going to be a complete rework of the walkway and their iron support structure. He knows if they go mucking around the bridge deck support iron beams and severely corroded gussets might need a lot of work. The job cost could get really big and shut the bridge anyways. The bridge is obsolete by four times and it is breathing its death throes. He goes spending big bucks in Hinsdale…then ten other towns in his district are going to be looking to string him up to their worst bridge.

It makes you wonder if we are seeing a NHDOT organizational disease. We make one of those “facilitative assumptions” where the bridge is so dilapidated and old, why waste money in it. A new bridge is right around the corner so shut your eyes and don’t waste money on it. The state effectively disconnects itself from the overseeing the bridge and doing the proper upkeep of it. A young or middle-age bridge has a huge value in it so we will take care of it. A decrepit bridge is so ugly and expensive…just turn away your eyes from it and don’t look. It is only human nature. Is there something in our brain or organization that unintentionally turns off our caring because of these affects…obscures our vision and curiosity?    

The below from the most recent spring 2013 Environmental Assessment is interesting. The first Wal-Mart store forced Hinsdale and the NHDOT to construct a sidewalk and a walkway. With the rot going on in wooden planks and rotting iron works who won’t hold a screw or hold on to the planks, it must be a cheaply defective design and construction of this walkway.

You know, that is the “New Hampshire Advantage”. It is a whole set of half ass fixes and “facilitative assumptions”. This unseen and hidden corruption goes on for decades after decades into the indefinite.  A facilitative assumption is when a CEO, politician and agency head…especially the professional class and engineers…who knowingly makes a corrupt critical organizational decision based on self-interest or a narrow interest in order to save his job and career. You make an assumption deep under the citizenry and employees, knowingly not aligned with the facts or the greater good in order fulfill a narrow and shallow interest. It is dastardly hidden corruption deep behind the scenes that screws all the innocent and good citizens. It mostly benefits the professional class and the politicians.

There are also good facilitative assumptions. A young man makes a mistake. You think he is just inexperience and immature…but you give him many breaks because you know he will become a great man. You will make him a great man. And he then does become a great man.

Heuristics is related this…   
 

BRATTLEBORO, VT – HINSDALE, NH TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR BRF 2000(19)SC  June, 2013
 
…In 1993 a sidewalk was installed on the north side of both bridges…

So the Hinsdale bridge walkway becomes direly unsafe…the District 4 Engineer’s choices are to refurbish the walkway or to block the walkway from further traffic. He doesn’t have the funding to do our bridge walkways. All the pedestrians will then have to walk the bridge deck roadway. Two opposing cars at the same time got barely enough room to pass each other…certainly there in insufficient room for two big trucks. Can you image the hue and cry to the District 4 Engineer and Concord if they make pedestrians walk on the functionally obsolete bridge road bed without any safety breakdown lane? Believe me; the daily peak traffic doesn’t have enough room to get the cars by without a lot of time delay, with the sharp 90 degree turn and massive public speeding.

I know the solution considering the realities in Concord, NH and keeping my job…only one lane of traffic going across the one bridge at one time. Here comes the New Hampshire Advantage? It will reduce the traffic stress of the bridge to extend the bridge life and allow pedestrians to passage the bridge without a separated walkway. Everyone will be safe.  But traffic will be backed up all the way to Putney and Winchester?

Many people and my own family have come up to me to explain how impacted and inconvenienced they will be. Mike, if the bridge closes, you are going to eat up between two to three hours a day with a round trip. We are talking about 30 miles and verging on $10 bucks a day. This is going to severely impact thousands of innocent people. Mike, you know your town is poverty stricken and most of our community is struggling with inadequate income and time. This is going to hurt the poor way more than anyone else…don’t even talk about gasoline prices. Mike, you are stealing money right out of their purses and pockets. 
 
So you got conflicting human needs and budgets, priories and limitations... budgets, priorities and limitations are always extraordinarily immoral. The limitations always get concentrated in the poorest and weakest segments of our society. The state of New Hampshire with this NH Advantage has become a monster to our weakest and poorest. It is tax breaks for the big boys and suffering and insecurity for the bottom half…

The bridge inspection group leader right in front of me turned a blind eye to the deterioration of safety with the walkway…he knew injuries and possible deaths was right around the corner. The enormous consequences without adequate budgets for valuing human life was too severe for the NHDOT and the Districts 4 Engineer…the known severely degraded walkway wooden planks and the iron works that holds up the walkway. The easy default that just defers pain and suffering…compared to shutting downing down the bridge, walkway or gaining more funding for the NH transportation system…was to knowingly turn a blind eye to the rotting walkway and to falsify NH and federal documents.

As Ralph Nader once chewed us all out…he said it was always about the least worst choice. It always about the least worst choice. It is never about our highest or best choice. It is never about us all being honorable men and women. The miserable and rotten system makes our lives all about least worst choices. Our children live whole least worst lives. Did god make a least worst Universe?  

You know when an organization is near brain dead…where they don’t appreciate paper work and the bureaucracy. Were everyone in trained that documented observations and concerns are extraordinarily important attributes for a learning organization. You make it easily document their concerns in public form and you make is the issues non erasable and searchable. You hold yourself accountable to the voter, public, and everyone.

If you ignore something or miss it then a person can come back through the recorded document. I warned them. Here, this is from their system…see, they got a pattern going on here. I am telling you this is powerful stuff and it leverages experiences in the learning organization.

Then you got the constant do nothing complainers. You say stop that chatter, do something about it. Make a complaint and stick with to the end. The rumor is these guys are serious with complaints and you can change things. Right, you are talking about public participation and the little guy gaining faith in government. But I am crazy guy at the foot of the bridge wearing a halo and putting a cut blue sheet over my shoulders…     

It is easily apparent to me the NHDOT increasingly is losing the organizational ability to discriminate between little human safety risk or community well-being risk and enormous risk of injury, death and widespread wellbeing risk to a community. They increasingly can’t separate the background noise from an important signals or message. The NHDOT is facing deepening troubles with NHDOT budgets and ever increasing to-do-list of degraded roads, bridge and infrastructure. A human’s brain or organization ability to discriminate big problems from little problems is a wonderful gift…when a brain is forced to discriminate too much it becomes exhausted or we call it we “become numbed”. Becoming numb in high consequence organizations, as is in prolong driving a car in heavy metropolitan congestion and traffic becomes extraordinarily dangerous when you become numbed…is very dangerous.  It is much like if an organization dances around or jumps over the fire too much…you become numb to the dangers of the fire.

I am warning you, New Hampshire is a runaway monster without a conscience…or they have become severely numbed by an increasing assortment of problems, financial problems and pressures. They can’t tell right from wrong, background noise from critical warnings and information. NH is acting as a monster…we have become monsters because we have become so inattentive, exhausted and numbed because of insecurity, inadequate resources and increasing needs.   

2)   You got real issues with this 1921 (Brattleboro) bridge swinging, vibrating and swaying under light load and traffic conditions. It gets much worst increasingly with heavier traffic. Two or three cars and a pickup truck on the bridge gets that bridge vibrating uncomfortably. Heavy traffic, big trucks and especially semis creates stomach wrenching vibrations, creates resonant traffic vibrations.  I am taking about swaying and up and down…plus the big vibrations. There got to be some engineering limits or standards to this dangerous motion. Something is really wrong with that bridge.

I consider this abnormal bridge movement a dire warning of imminent bridge collapsed and a direly weak or damaged bridge structure. I kid everyone; you have to take your motion sickness (Dramamine) meds if you don’t want to throw up before you get 350 feet to the other side of the bridge.

I am just saying, you could have a lot of unseen damage and degradation to the bridge stiffening structural members, relatively small iron works…this could set up this tragic heavy unnatural vibration and swaying. It just could be a poor design for the conditions we place this 1921 bridge under with the heavier vehicles and never anticipated heavy traffic. Traffic levels drastically are on the way up too in the coming years…   

They got small cell phone like instrumentation and powerful accelerometers. They could record the bridge vibration and send them the data intermittently through the cell phone system. They got decent accurate modern computer structural programs…they could give you a normal range of bridge vibrations. It would give you an early indication of developing bridge problems. Did I remind you this bridge is 93 years old?    

It is interesting thinking about the historic and future daily average traffic going across this bridge. As I say, New Hampshire is a monster without a conscience to think our “hanging by thread”severely degraded bridge can withstand the beating of 13,000 car and trucks per day for any length of time.

Think about this increasingly severe degradation going on in an assortment of 1921 bridge components and 13,000 vehicles traveling across the bridge in 2015. They should put the NHDOT executives into the Brattleboro Retreat. You catch trend with the rate of change of vehicles a day going over this in a very short period?  How much traffic will the farm tractor supply store and burgeoning fireworks industry bring us by 2020? My best estimate with the politics of New Hampshire is the new bridge won’t be built for 50 years.

The 1915 “Sewalls Falls Road Bridge” in Concord NH is another of the NHDOT’s Frankenstein monsters with allowing huge chunks of the bridge to fall off and they say you are good to go till  2015 if you cross that bridge with your eyes closed. Hinsdale is heading directly to the Sewalls Falls Road Bridge with huge weight restriction and lane limitations.

God help us all if the economy picks up?   

2010: 7200 vehicles per day (vpd)

2012: 9700 vpd

2015: 13,000 vpd  

This spring I asked my “corn cobbling” NHDOT Bridge lead inspector buddy if this bridge is swaying and vibrating dangerously? He said the new Navy Seabees Bridge does the same vibrating and swinging…all modern bridge does this to minimize stresses. It sounded good from a NHDOT bridge inspection leader, right. I wonder how much bridge inspection training they really get and their educations levels. These guys probable get a three week quickie course and a few days of training every ten years. The first thing NH cuts has always been training and education.

The next thing I know I was then standing for 2 hours in the middle of the New Route 9 Connecticut River Seabees Bridge four miles upstream from Hinsdale in heavy traffic. It is really a beautiful and sturdy bridge. The bridge doesn’t have any walkway, the old bridge is the walkway…so I was standing on the unprotected spacey and gorgeous breakdown safety lane. I mean, what was I going to tell the cops if they came? I was trying to get a feel for the bridge vibration? They would have been taking me to Retreat. It was solid and vibration free. It was if I standing on a granite outcrop on the nearby Wantastiquet Mountain. I think all these NHDOT employees are habituated into lying and telling half-truths to the stupid mushroom public. Or just not talking when they know something…

3)  What is up with that huge anchor bolt not being attached to the concrete footing on the Brattleboro Bridge’s southern corner side? Why is the really thick iron plate bent that attaches the nut to the dangling anchor bolt?  Why is the thick iron plate below the bent iron plate mostly destroyed by corrosion and it is 80% delaminated? The concern I have with seeing this picture with the original 1921 concrete, is massive degradation of the bridge west concrete footing. The big semis would be beating the hell out of this concrete. As with the massive unseen corrosion destruction of the iron plates seen in my picture that is deep within the belly of this beast, how assured can we be that the other iron structural components on or near the footing or foundation are not destroyed.

“WSDOT Bridge Design Manual”

Obviously, bridges cannot be built incrementally longer without eventually requiring expansion joint devices. The incidence of approach pavement distress problems increases markedly with increased movement that must be accommodated by the end diaphragm pressing against the backfill. Approach pavement distress includes pavement and backfill settlement and broken approach slab anchors.

…If some means was not used to accommodate this, the bridge could buckle.

4)   The Brattleboro Bridge has no expansion joint. Our bridge can expand and contract to the tune of 2 to 6 inches between the extremes of the outside seasonal temperatures. Both sides of these bridges are hard attached by multiple large anchor bolts to the crumbling 1921 concrete footing or foundation. The bridge has an expansion joint on the west side…it is non-functional…the deck is hard attached to the footing on both side.  Why isn’t a lack of a functioning bridge expansion joint leading to serious bridge degradation and an eventual bride collapse? I think this is a critical bridge design error and it is amazing that massive bridge damage hasn’t shown up yet…

NTSB 2007 Investigation into the Minneapolis I35 Bridge Collapse

“Expansion joint: A meeting point between two parts of a structure that is designed to allow for independent movement of the parts due to thermal expansion while protecting the parts from damage. Expansion joints are commonly visible on a bridge deck as a hinged or movable connection perpendicular to the roadway”

5)   The bridge rollers are frozen in place and a roller (rocker bearing) is displaced at an angle indicating severe bridge movement. I got a feeling during prior bridge renovations and refurbishment the NHDOT intentionally bypassed the bridge rollers by hard connecting the bridge deck to the footing or foundation though huge anchor bolting?

NTSB 2007 Investigation into the Minneapolis I35 Bridge Collapse

 “Rocker bearing: A bridge support bearing that accommodates thermal expansion and contraction of the superstructure through a rocking action.”

This should be damaging the bridge and leading to a bridge collapse as read in all the bridge engineering and maintenance procedures. It leads to much more expensive maintenance on a bridge on a not maintained bridge. It should be noticed the traffic entrance at both ends of the bridge comes on the bridge at an angle or not good geometry…not a straight shot across the bridge including their entrances. It is a lot to torque (centrifugal) and stress for a bridge with a car or heavy truck turning on the bridge at high speeds. This creates all sorts unnatural bridge stress with the modern vehicle weights and unimagined traffic at bridge design time that was never considered in the initial bridge analysis. See pictures in my blog.

6)   On the west side of the Brattleboro Bridge the huge upper truss (2) iron beams (holds up the deck) are connected to the concrete by a huge metal bracket (4). A huge metal nut and bolt, along with metal plates, holds the critical truss to the concrete abutment or footing. There is massive and severe corrosion going on in all these components. The concrete footing is severely cracked and spalled allowing road water to intrude deeply into the degraded abutment or/and footing. I estimate the safety critical truss, bolting and brackets are more than 70% destroyed. Stomach wrenching and throwing up disgusting pictures of these components are on my blog. The pictures from my camera don’t near capture how bad this area is and  can’t give you a good impression of the depth of wastage.      

7)   The whole Brattleboro Bridge East entrance is subsiding and shifting.  This includes the bridge abutment, footing, foundation, masonry materials, the large granite blocks are displaced, piers and the whole east end of the bridge. In the right weather conditions, saturated soil the heavy truck vibrations  could get massive shifting or a landside of the entrance under soil ending with the huge bridge and its passengers calving into the river. That includes both sided of the bridge detaching from the foundations with its weak attachments and the bridge tipping over in the river. We have no idea what is under the bridge foundation…it is probably river sand, composting sentiment and compacting mud. In 1921 you can’t count on it being rock ledge or granite bed rock. Remember “Island Park” is nothing but a Connecticut River sand bar.   

8)   Let’s play the “value of human” life hide and seek game? State NHDOT peek-a-boo. This should take the breath away from any bridge civil engineer of any standing what-so-ever.

NTSB 2007 Investigation into the Minneapolis I35 Bridge Collapse 

Distortion of Gusset Plates: The Safety Board concludes that distortion such as bowing is a sign of an out-of-design condition that should be identified and subjected to further engineering analysis to ensure that the appropriate level of safety is maintained.

Can you find the bent and detaching bridge gusset on the Brattleboro Bridge? Bent and damage bridge gussets are a severe indication of imminent bridge failure or collapse. You blind and stupid civil engineers’ need a clue and a real life, it is on the east side of the Brattleboro Route 119 Bridge with the subsiding bridge entrance and its foundation, and the severe corrosion to the upper truss connection, to the bridge crumbling foundation. 


BRATTLEBORO, VT – HINSDALE, NH TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR BRF 2000(19)SC  June, 2013 

‘The existing substructures are a mix of concrete and masonry materials. Vertical and horizontal clearances are inadequate by current AASHTO design standards. In 1988 structural elements were replaced. In 1993 a sidewalk was installed on the north side of both bridges. In 2003 precast concrete deck panels were installed on both bridges. Despite ongoing maintenance efforts, both bridges are considered seriously deteriorated due to river scouring at the foundations, concrete spalling in the abutments and piers, and corrosion to the structural steel framing.”

9)   Towards the west end of the Brattleboro Bridge a vertical member, maybe a diagonal member near the road bed is severely bent and displaced. I suspect it occurred on contact with a snow plow or it comes from a vehicle accident when this member wasn’t protected by, maybe the 1988 installed guard rail job.

NTSB 2007 Investigation into the Minneapolis I35 Bridge Collapse 

“Corrosion on Gusset Plates: The I‑35W bridge was only one of a number of steel truss bridges that were found to have gusset plate corrosion and section loss that had been overlooked or underestimated by State bridge inspectors. In 1996, gusset plates on the eastbound Lake County Grand River bridge in Ohio failed while the bridge was undergoing maintenance. The failure was attributed to corrosion and section loss, which had completely penetrated the gusset plates at some locations. The amount of section loss had been masked by corrosion products to the extent that it could not be adequately assessed solely through visual bridge inspections.”

The below road grade gusset to which the vertical member is attached is severely corroded and the rust is black and delaminating. It’s got two huge rust bubbles on this gusset protruding out maybe a quarter inch on each side and thick delaminated rust layers can clearly be seen. The gusset is below road level and it is exposed to a lot of salt in the winter. I suspect the significant vehicle contact bent the lower gusset in two places…this is where the cancerous rust is growing. For all the below road grade gussets I intensely inspected, this gusset is by far the worst…this is ””way”” worse than any of the others.

NTSB 2007 Investigation into the Minneapolis I35 Bridge Collapse

Finding #21

“The Safety Board therefore concludes that because visual bridge inspections alone, regardless of their frequency, are inadequate to always detect corrosion on gusset plates or to accurately assess the extent or progression of that corrosion, inspectors should employ appropriate nondestructive evaluation technologies when evaluating gusset plates.”

I believe bending this gusset in a vehicle collision intensified the corrosion process and poor inspection allowed this condition to fester. This corrosion is so thick there just in no way to access the metal integrity underneath it. The thickness of the metal plate could be severely degraded and we have no idea if there are cracks developing in the gusset underneath the member damage and severely delaminating rust. This half inch gusset looks like it is an “inch” thick looking at it from the side.

NTSB 2007 Investigation into the Minneapolis I35 Bridge Collapse 

Probable Cause

The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of the collapse of the I-35W bridge in Minneapolis, Minnesota, was the inadequate load capacity, due to a design error by Sverdrup & Parcel and Associates, Inc., of the gusset plates at the U10 nodes, which failed under a combination of (1) substantial increases in the weight of the bridge, which resulted from previous bridge modifications, and (2) the traffic and concentrated construction loads on the bridge on the day of the collapse. Contributing to the design error was the failure of Sverdrup & Parcel’s quality control procedures to ensure that the appropriate main truss gusset plate calculations were performed for the I-35W bridge and the inadequate design review by Federal and State transportation officials.

>>>Contributing to the accident was the generally accepted practice among Federal and State transportation officials of giving inadequate attention to gusset plates during inspections for conditions of distortion, such as bowing, and of excluding gusset plates in load rating analyses.<<<

It doesn’t look like the NHDOT did their mandatory gusset inspection of every similar style bridge coming out of the 2007 NTSB Minneapolis I 35 bridge collapse investigation…

NTSB 2007 Investigation into the Minneapolis I35 Bridge Collapse 

Gusset plate: A metal plate used to unite multiple structural members of a truss.

I believe the ‘Environmental Assessment BRATTLEBORO, VT – HINSDALE, NH TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR BRF 2000(19)SC “ is severely incomplete and has a serious lack of granularity. The Environment Assessment report wasn’t observant enough with truck and car bridge interactions. They are keying off the NHDOT who have falsified their reports and they haven’t done independent evaluations of the structural condition of both bridges.

I will submit to you, there is way more tractor trailers and giant logging tractor trailers trucks than cement trucks.

This is how it should have been stated the truck and car interaction. The local population who crosses these bridges know what I am saying is accurate. Typically only one large semi and no cars can passage critical choke points at the same times. If the assessment is so incomplete with traffic interactions, why isn’t other assessment and analysis incomplete? 

Typically on both entrances of the Brattleboro Bridge, the vast majority of the semis stop before he enters the bridge. He is waiting for all the traffic to clear before he jumps onto the bridge. He is also waiting for a polite vehicle on the other side of the bridge to stop before enters the bridge. At multiple points, his cab has to jump into the opposing traffic lane so he can get his big butt “way back there” to make it around the protruding corner of the bridge. It take him many feet to get his big rig straighten out on the bridge.  A lot of these semis once on the bridge ride in the middle of bridge straddling both lanes. He doesn’t want anyone on the bridge with him. Then he has to put his cab in the opposing traffic lane so his butt “way back there” will be able to make it around the corner. The sides of the bridge have drastically inadequate height…he could damage the trailer and bridge because the trailer is too high if he drive too close to the outside of the road. He drives in both lanes of traffic so his trailer won’t be damaged.  So that is another reason these semis take up the two lanes of this two lane bridge. They even do that on the Hinsdale Bridge even with no sharp corners and a straight approach in both directions. Even small trucks and the semis know the small truck can’t be on the bridge with the semi.

You can see the guard railing damage on both sides of the bridge when a semi driver misjudges this maneuver…it happens a lot.

I am saying this report severely minimizes the truck traffic and car problems with their passage through the critical choke points on the Hinsdale Route 119 bridges. They just weren’t very observant with their reporting. They are severely downplaying the condition of the bridge.

Environmental Assessment

“Simultaneous passage of two large trucks at this curve, and on the bridges, is difficult.”

We are in a Town and locale emergency…it is a huge emergency. This report doesn’t state that clearly. We could lose the bridge at any moment…get draconian vehicle restrictions in the next second…lose lives in a bridge collapse.  These could hurt tens of thousands of people and many businesses. We are in a state NHDOT hurricane Katrina or Superstorm Sandy emergency…our New Hampshire state government has caught on fire and nobody has called 911 and the fire department yet.   

I am available to give tours explaining my pictures…especially for executives and engineers with the NHDOT, any government officials and the media. I will teach you a lot.  You should bring Dramamine and wear old jeans. Some areas would need you to be a little gutsy and you shouldn’t be too afraid of heights. Just give me a call or throw me email.

Mike Mulligan, Hinsdale, NH

1-603-336-8320

steamshovel2002@yahoo.com   

I was the instigator of one of the largest fraud criminal cases in the State of New Hampshire ($500 million -$600 million dollars and many people going to jail). 

God only gives me the impossible cases….the problems everyone has given up on. They bring me into a problem when all hope is lost. I take the cases nobody else will touch. I am the prince of the improbable and the impossibility.

 
Sincerely,

 

 
Mike Mulligan
PO 161
Hinsdale, NH

Hinsdale's I-5 Skagit River Bridge collapse



Yep, the top of the bridge...

Reposted on June 17, 2014

So I originally publish this on Friday July 30. I recently got arrested on multiple counts surrounding this bridge...5 counts including littering with a "Need New Bridge" sign.

So what is the total count of truck strike on the Hinsdale-Brattleboro bridges...I count 14. Eight being really serious. Why wasn't all this damage removed and replaced...brought back to the designer intent?
I-5 Skagit River Bridge collapse
 On May 23, 2013, at approximately 7:00 pm PDT, one span of the Interstate 5 bridge over the Skagit River at Mount Vernon, Washington State immediately collapsed into the river when it was struck by an over-height truck. Two other vehicles with three people fell with the span. The trapped people were rescued by boats.  
The vertical clearance for vehicles is limited by the portals and sideways sway structs. These are relatively low in older bridges. In Washington State bridges, the sway struts are often curved downwards at the outer ends, with less clearance above the outer lanes and outer shoulders. Tall loads then need to use the inner lanes for maximal clearance. These bridges are vulnerable to impacts by overheight vehicles, and such impacts were common. There was a known strike on this bridge that occurred on October 22, 2012, and investigators found evidence of several other impacts in years past.[8] Bridge inspection reports dating back to the 1979 frequently note damage caused by over-height vehicles, and an inspection report from late 2012 noted a three-inch gash in the steel.[9]
So I am beginning to document all the truck bridge strikes. This is a beginning...there has been horrible damage. And none of the severely damaged members have ever been repaired

There is tremendous energy liberated with truck bridge strikes. This is beginning in Brattleboro and on the right siding facing Hinsdale. The next pictures we will see from both sides of this damage protective lip...on the left hand side.


The below two severe damage is opposite sides of the same accident. This end of the bridge has tremendous footing bolt damage, destroyed footing and enormous corrosion to the metal attachment to the foundation. This moved the big truss...



This below is on the other side of the metal plate accident protrusion...you see the massive strike energy that bulged out this really thick metal. Why was't this replaced...there was a enormous transfer of strike energy to this huge main trust. There is a lot of damage underneath the deck and onto the footing. Who know when this happened?

This is called a diagonal member and it attached to gussets on both end. The below gusset is severely corroded  and the gusset itself is damaged from the crash.




Being bent like that means one or both gussets have been moved...along with anything attached to the trust you can see. This area near this severely diagonal member has stomach churning movement and vibration. The accident severely damaged this quarter of the bridge?


More of the same...




Same bridge below...next two pictures are the same strike..



This guy is bent from the front and back axis...


Check out the below bulgeing  gusset point...this is the result of the entrance and foundation sinking and sliding on the island sandbar.



Look at the massive bending of the top member...these two vertical members have to be slightly bent towards each other for that kind of bend. Tremendous damage to the bridge.


Ugly, ugly, ugly...enormous forces...both top beams bent.







Below, are these criss cross things really needed





Hinsdale Bridge Cover-up

Originally published on 6/14

Average annual daily traffic counts in 2010 for the main artery between Hinsdale and Brattleboro stood at 9,700. Projected counts for 2032 increase to nearly 15,000.
Well, they estimated in 2012 the traffic volume would be 12,275 in 2015…
1) 2009 at 5300 vehicles a day

2) 2012 at 7300 vehicle
So it averages 667 vehicles a day increase per year.
Now the most recent Hinsdale bridge project estimates in 2013 it is 9700 vehicles per day…
That is a difference on average of 4400 more vehicles a day going across the Hinsdale Bridges in one year verses 667 vehicles on average a day per year in between 2009 and 2012.
You see the amazing increasing trends…the rate of change of vehicles going across the bridges are staggering.
*** 9700 vehicles per day gives us a 3.5 million (3,540,500) vehicles going across bridge in one year at a 2013 year rate.
This isn't including the "Tractor Supply" store and this place just opened.   
June 16
Ok, from my indigent perspective…where do we stand on the Hinsdale Bridge from the early summer of 2013? So they threw at us a new wooden walkway supported by the dangerously corroded metal support brackets. Everyone wants me to spin this in an optimistic manner…make us feel better than the situation actually is. All the alarm bells should be ringing when you hear the NHDOT placed the bridge on the 2014 ten year plan…the House passed the plan and the Senate won’t pass it. It is the typical political shenanigans over fully funding our transportation needs as we have seen for last thirty years about this bridge. It is a 1921 bridge and we are crazy using it today! What does that say about our greater society? One year our bridge is in on the ten year plan and the next it’s taken off. You make a little noise, you get back a political promissory “maybe” response which is never fulfilled. Oh please, love and vote for us even if we are incapable of effecting change!

Where we sit right now, in the beginning of the summer of 2014 considering the political shenanigans in Concord and Washington…never has it been more pessimistic that we will get this bridge replaced in time in order to save the economies Hinsdale and the surroundings. This is going to end up terribly disrupting the lives of most of us, as it is always is with these things, it is more going to destroy the lives of the poor and weak more than the well off.  
 
The local population is incapable of making the necessity level of political noise (attention getting tools) commiserate with the value of this transportation corridor and this bridge. You don't truely understand the value of this transpotation corridor. The background noise with events going on in Concord and Washington are so loud…they are incapable of hearing the little peeps of our vital societal needs and providing it for us. We are in the same boat as everyone else is.

You know, just go back to your happy beer drinking and summertime picnics…everything is beautiful.

This is my humble assessment of our pathetic plight!
The below picture was taken and placed on my blog in around the summer of 2013. The bridge is held up like a table with four legs...this is one of legs. The picture doesn't do the missing metal justice in the rust ring about this huge bolt. There is a enormous amounts of metal missing in this rust ring that is corroded away. Check out the white salt marks?

2013

Just checking, had my son take this below picture for me this spring about a week ago (2014). I am legally restricted from being this close to the bridge, well I have to keep moving. The pictures were taken one year apart. It is the exact same rusted bolt as the above. This is called major repairs on our bridge by our NHDOT. The NHDOT carelessly painted the bolt towards the end of summer 2013. They are suppose to sand blast all the rust away, put a primer on and then the regular coat. Look at the "rust through" in the new half ass paint job in "way less" than one year.

I am probably only one in the world with the capabilities of creating and capturing this by photography...provoking the NHDOT. It is a very sorry situation!!!!

But the NHDOT is paying attention to me...

(By the way, it is much like what the NRC is doing today with the nuclear industry.)

Spring 2014
 
I am so proud as hell of my hard work...
 
The NHDOT 2013 paint job is equivalent to Obama's quality and size of his infrastructure and jobs new program...
 
I believe this is the north side... the other side of  the nut above! Check out those missing rivet heads...there are dissolved rivet heads and bolts all over this bridge!
 
 
My bridge protest in Maybe 2011 or 2012?
 
 
 
 A gusset took out the Minneapolis bridge...the below is a bridge gusset.
 
 
 
 
This is a embedded bolt holding the roadbed deck to the concrete footing.
 
 
 
Beginning a gallery of dissolved and corroded rivets, bolts and nuts?
 
 
Who is in pajamas and asleep?
 
Wake up! Wake up! Wake up!
 

 
 
 
 
This is one of the brackets holding up the new wooden walkway that I made them replace! It holds up the walkway!
 
Actually this is the walkway...
 
 
I don' remember below where I got this from.
 
 
 
 
Inside our Hinsdale NH Town Hall in the fall 2013...in public meeting with the NHDOT about replacing our bridge after I was arrested.
 
 
 
 
 
 This is the concrete pedestal holding up "the other leg" of the table!
 
Photo
 
 


Transcript Aug 2013: Bridge Environmental Assessment Meeting in Brattleboro

I am getting dam sick and tired with this guy talking with phrases like: "you know" and "stuff like that". This article would be half as long if he could just dump those phrases from his speech!
Sneaky Corruption: I very leery with engineers and PhDs using their education and their professional stature to justify reducing the engineering standards of a bridge instead of maintaining and enforcing the original standards…especially in this case, where we are massively increasing the duty, traffic and loads of the bridge over nine decades.
" I want you guys to expect everybody to start digging dirt in the spring of next year (2014)."

MR. MULLIGAN: First of all, the characterization of the traffic on the bridge is Incomplete as far as the -- you said that barely two trucks couldn't pass the -- on the Hinsdale Bridge, and actually only one truck at a time can easily --can pass the bridge. Also, I'm interested on both sides of the bridge, to the geometry issue, --

MS. O'LEARY: Hm-hmm.

MR. MULLIGAN: -- can go on, and so the truck has to stick its nose way out in the traffic, and there's all sorts of issues with – of obstructing traffic. These trucks going out there, (unclear), stuff like that, so that sort –

MS. O'LEARY: And geometrically, right, there are definitely issues with both bridges and approach-ways. That is documented in the EA, as I said, and I think that it said that two bridges can't -- or two trucks can't pass at the same time, that's the difficulty, if they need to, that's what we're trying to fix, and they can't right now, so you're correct only that one at a time, under certain conditions at certain parts of Route 19 across the bridge, that is correct.

MR. MULLIGAN: And cars –

MS. O'LEARY: Hm-hmm.

 MR. MULLIGAN: -- a car can't pass a tractor-trailer on the bridge where it approaches, and stuff like that.

MS. O'LEARY: On either?

MR. MULLIGAN: On either, right, right, so that we know. And also, that the greater issue is – the core issues of the bridge, you know, my side of the story is, I want you guys to expect everybody to start digging dirt in the spring of next year.

MS. O'LEARY: Hmm.

MR. MULLIGAN: The socio-economic issue of it, or a bridge shut-down, or the -- restricting the weight on the bridges, and all that sort of stuff, --

MS. O'LEARY: Hm-hmm.

MR. MULLIGAN: -- will be tremendous as far as both communities; and also hindering as far as growth and business growth, and stuff like that, is a great concern if the bridges are allowed to stand as they are.

MS. O'LEARY: Hm-hmm.

MR. MULLIGAN: As far as 2010, there were 7200 vehicles per day, --

MS. O'LEARY: Hm-hmm.

MR. MULLIGAN: -- and 2012, there were 10,000 vehicles per day, and in 2015 -- you want me to correct -- projects 13,000 vehicles a day, --

MS. O'LEARY: Hm-hmm.

MR. MULLIGAN: -- and that's a tremendous increase in vehicle traffic. We don't know what the break-out is as far as trucks and stuff like that.

MS. O'LEARY: Right.

MR. MULLIGAN: On the -- the bigger problem again is the condition of the bridges. I think it is grossly-inaccurate in your report and also the DOT. I see tremendous bridge-type issues on the bridge. There's tremendous member of bending and gusset-bending and gusset-weakening, and the – the side -- the thing that's in the gusset is half-an-inch, --

MS. O'LEARY: Hm-hmm.


MR. MULLIGAN: -- and there's another half-inch or less on the outside, so how can New Hampshire even consider construction and integrity of the gusset? These bridges, as you know, are critical -- are both critical, --

MS. O'LEARY: Hm-hmm.

MR. MULLIGAN: -- both (unclear), or both critical, or both (unclear), whatever it is.

MS. O'LEARY: Hm-hmm.

MR. MULLIGAN: A gusset goes and the whole bridge goes in the drink. So we have the footing (phonetic) problems, the Brattleboro west side bridge, that whole -- additions, the dirt, and everything, is all shifting.

MS. O'LEARY: Hm-hmm.

MR. MULLIGAN: And there's gusset movement and bending and stuff like that.

MS. O'LEARY: Hm-hmm.

MR. MULLIGAN: And indicates that there's been movement of that side of the bridge, and stuff like that. But everybody's playing, you know, let's make believe, this is the way it is, and nobody wants to go down there and really look at that bridge –

MS. O'LEARY: So you feel that we over --even though we're saying it's structurally-obsolete and functionally-obsolete, you're feeling that we're over-estimating the safety of the bridge is your comment.

MS. MULLIGAN: By many magnitudes.

MS. O'LEARY: Okay.

MR. MULLIGAN: And -- and like I said, when this issue of all these members meeting, --

MS. O'LEARY: Hm-hmm.

MR. MULLIGAN: -- all these super-structure members being bended, tremendous damage, tremendous bending of these members, and stuff like that, would that be critical, a bridge like that -- one of those things would go and the whole bridge could go in. As long as the -- they indicated with the footings and the huge truss knuckles underneath the bridge, there's a tremendous amount of wastage (phonetic) on those knuckles and bolts that hold the trusses together, and stuff like that, along that. So you have the members that are bent and huge areas of these trusses -- well, not huge, --

Ms. O'LEARY: Hm-hmm.

MR. MULLIGAN: -- let's say, the huge trusses, themselves, are bent and will be opened up, and stuff, along with all that stuff underneath it. How do we know that New Hampshire DOT really understands these two interactions together, how do we really know that these bridges are going to last for another 50 years? Because the way it's going now, New Hampshire isn't going to change their politics, and -- and they're starving their transportation budgets, right, --

MS. O'LEARY: Hm-hmm.

MR. MULLIGAN: -- stagnation and starving for the last 30 years. They can't pass -- you know, that bridge is unsafe, they can't pass it, to shut it down if it's unsafe, right? And so the gap, the gap of these two things, you know, these New Hampshire officials don't have the courage, they'll face tremendous political outcome if they had to shut that bridge down. And so -- and so the gap, the gap, between these two things, these two impossibilities, is they falsify documents.

MS. O'LEARY: Well, I certainly can't speak to that, and I can tell you that we don't have any falsified documents in here, and unfortunately I can't speak to the New Hampshire budget, either, but bridges are rated on an engineering scale that's used across the country for safety. And so they did score low in the 40s, definitely, which is why they're in line to be fixed, but it's not made-up reasons, there's definitely -- there's criterias, and there's -- specific things get checked on every bridge, and so that has been done, and that's why we have the numbers in the 40s.


MR. MULLIGAN: All I say -- one more thing –

MS. O'LEARY: Yeah.

MR. MULLIGAN: -- is that that's a near collapse, we're going to break apart, where that bridge is so fragile, there's so many degraded parts, the super-structure underneath the bridge. The New Hampshire -- the DOT, they come with these fancy words about engineering, and stuff, and degrees, and Master's Degrees and Ph.Ds, and you can -- you can baloney the people, and stuff, with, you know, the institutional stuff with the engineers and educators, and stuff like that, and at the end of the day, you're not asking proof of these guys, they're just throwing you -- they're just throwing you trash and words, and stuff like that, and they're not showing you any of the events that are really going on, and stuff. And so just by throwing out (unclear) the professional class, and –

MS. O'LEARY: Hm-hmm.

MR. MULLIGAN: -- and you don't have to have (unclear) from us, we'll just -- we'll go on our statute and our sense of professionalism. A guy like me, they don't ask -- they ask like what's your proof, what's your proof that that bridge is going to go down, and stuff like -- they ask me triplicate proof, they simply -- you know, they don't trust me. The professional class, they -- they trust them to be infinite, you know, as far as that, so – and there you go.

MS. O'LEARY: All right, well, thank you for your comments.

MR. MULLIGAN: Thank you.


***MR. MULLIGAN: There -- my friends in Hinsdale are wondering why I'm not in jail tonight, and maybe I should be. It's associated with the walkway, --

MS. O'LEARY: Hm-hmm.

MR. MULLIGAN: -- the walkway's been in terrible condition.

MS. O'LEARY: Hm-hmm.

MR. MULLIGAN: The State has known that the walkway, they have loose boards on the walkway. And I've seen a (unclear) from Brattleboro, they go to the convenience store, and there's two or three people with wheelchairs that uses that walkway. It's unavailable in the wintertime because nobody wants to snow-blow it.

MS. O'LEARY: Hm-hmm.

MR. MULLIGAN: A lot of fear that the bridges would collapse if there's a lot of heavy vehicles, or machines, and stuff like that. And so they've had a recent inspection. The bridge, they had actually two inspections, last fall and this spring, and stuff, and -- and a thorough inspection, more or less, --

MS. O'LEARY: Hm-hmm.

MR.MULLIGAN: -- but they didn't catch the bridge walkway. They didn't catch all the dangerous boards that were loose, and, you know, as you're --you go with a bicycle, and you go lap-lap-lap-lap-lap, there are loose boards, and I'm the expert at knowing something in boards in Hinsdale because I threw a bunch of them in the river yesterday. And so the thing is, really the thing is, is that you can't trust the State, you cannot trust the State to do an inspection. You can -- they're too politically-controlled, and stuff like that. That the walkway is a metaphor for how the New Hampshire DOT handles oversight and inspections, and it's like I said, there's a prime example that they couldn't take that -- I was on there this spring with the inspectors, the bridge inspectors, and talking to them, and stuff like that. I explained to them how dangerous these boards are and how the hundreds of thousands of people -- and that's what I'm saying, hundreds of thousands of people who have gone past me, and who I've submitted, and who I've thrown kisses at and -- by the way, females and males, and an assortment of antics, --

MS. O'LEARY: Hm-hmm.

MR. MULLIGAN: -- and stuff like that, how, you know, how dangerous it is, the conditions are dangerous.

MS. O'LEARY: Hm-hmm.

MR. MULLIGAN: What's more dangerous with the State of New Hampshire Department of Transportation, they cannot fill out paperwork accurately. They -- the bridgeway -- the walkway, and stuff like that, which I handle myself by throwing boards over, and made it impassable, and they had a, you know, a -- they couldn't come down on their own, fix it right, they have a bridge (unclear) do the work that the New Hampshire Department of Transportation should have done, and stuff. And so, you know, you watch a movie, you see these movies where there's been terrible bridge accidents, right? –

MS. O'LEARY: Hm-hmm.

MR. MULLIGAN: -- and in all of them, there's always an angel hanging around the bridge before the collapse, I'm that bridge angel, thank you.

MS. O'LEARY: Thank you, Mike.

Monday, June 16, 2014

Hinsdale Bridge Vibrations


2009@5300 vpd  for a year gives us 1.9 million cars
2012@7300 vpd    2.7 million cars
2013@ 9700 vpd    3.5 million cars
2015@12775 vpd  4.7 million cars


Average annual daily traffic counts in 2010 for the main artery between Hinsdale and Brattleboro stood at 9,700. Projected counts for 2032 increase to nearly 15,000.
Well, they estimated in 2012 the traffic volume would be 12,775 in 2015…
1) 2009 at 5300 vehicles a day

2) 2012 at 7300 vehicle
So it averages 667 vehicles a day increase per year.
Now the most recent Hinsdale bridge project estimates in 2013 it is 9700 vehicles per day…
That is a difference on average of 4400 more vehicles a day going across the Hinsdale Bridges in one year verses 667 vehicles on average a day per year in between 2009 and 2012.
You see the amazing increasing trends…the rate of change of vehicles going across the bridges are staggering.
*** 9700 vehicles per day gives us a 3.5 million (3,540,500) vehicles going across bridge in one year at a 2013 year rate.
This isn't including the "Tractor Supply" store and this place just opened. 
June 16: 
It is common knowledge to everyone in our surroundings our bridges bounces up and down and sways terribly as cars a trucks use the bridge. People in buses notice it when they are stopped on the middle of the bridge, as with everyone in the cars. It makes everyone terribly nervous! Everyone involved with this should spend time on the walkway of the bridge.

The enormously dangerous situation most people don't "get"... understand ...is the traffic volume across this bridge is trending up at a fast rate. The rate of change intensified with the new Walmart and now the recent business development such a "Tractor Supply". It is going up a a fast rate. God knows what is going on in other development. And many big corporation look at the functionality of the Hinsdale bridge with future economic development and better jobs. Why build a big and expensive facility next to a dilapidated bridge that you need to get to the interstate. You can't predict the life of the 1921 bridge based on the traffic rate of two years ago. This is absolute and utter insanity! Just think of the increase of tractor trailers and cars these bridges have seen in the last few years coming out of these stores...
Right, people who hate government so much they are domestic terrorist...instead of aiming 911 airplanes at NYC skyscrapers, they blow up our government by defunding it and turning everyone else against government.
I do get it, not many media people have the technical capibilities to be able to protray these events to the public in a way they understand...

And a trillion dollars wasted on Iraq and climbing...
 
Originally posted on 9/26/13
 
Sept 30: This kind of crap is going on throughout NH government...these are domestic terrorist trying to disassemble NH government... 
 



NH Corrections: “We often wonder where the breaking point is going to be,” he said.
NHDOT: This is a message I got out of him: “Many years ago when I first got here we had about 120 employees. We have now around 70 employees.
N.H. Corrections Staff Feels Budget Losses

By Jeremy Blackman

Concord Monitor

Monday, September 30, 2013
(Published in print: Monday, September 30, 2013)


Concord — Patrick Bettens didn’t become a corrections officer for the overtime. But in the past six years, as budget constraints and declining staff counts have gripped the New Hampshire Department of Corrections, it has become a defining facet of his career. Nearly every week Bettens is asked or told with little advance notice to tack four, sometimes eight hours onto at least one of his five eight-hour evening shifts.

Walk into any division of the state prison and one theme will eventually surface: getting by with less. Education and vocational training programs have fewer instructors, industry facilities are open fewer hours per day, mental health and substance abuse services have been trimmed, correctional councilors are in short supply.

It seems unlikely it will get any easier. According to Department of Corrections spokesman Jeffrey Lyons, the department’s operating budget for the 2012-13 biennium was cut by $13 million after it passed, and the new, 2014-15 budget is $2 million less than that.

“We certainly have gone past trimming the fat and gone into cutting into the meat of the system,” Bettens said.

The Effects

His division has perhaps felt the greatest strain. Corrections Major Jon Fouts, who oversees security at the state prison, estimated that he’s lost more than 100 officers — about a third of his staff — through layoffs and attrition in recent years. As a result, he and other watch commanders are left with few options other than to compel existing officers to working extra hours just to meet what he called “safe minimal” staffing.

Security is not in jeopardy, Fouts insisted, but morale and workplace effectiveness has taken a hit.

“We often wonder where the breaking point is going to be,” he said.

Overtime expenses have also blown a hole in the department’s budget, swallowing nearly $8 million in the last two years and projected to do much the same through 2015, according to legislative finance documents.

Between 2004 and 2012, the department eliminated nearly 250 positions, including 25 percent of its corrections staff and instructors, 52 percent of its administrators, 22 percent of shop supervisors and 17 percent of its correctional counselors and case managers. The department had 97 staff vacancies last year, according to department records.

Despite the reductions, about 75 percent of the Corrections budget is allocated for personnel expenses.

“Other departments have been asked to live in their means, but the Department of Corrections is at a disadvantage, in my opinion, because when times get worse their job grows in demand,” he said.

Feb 27:
There was one more issue I wanted to talk about but forgot to mention it. If a problem ever came up that your bosses wouldn't let you touch and your conscience still bothers you...I could be a conduit to leak NHDOT documents and issues to the public. I am a well know nuclear whistleblower. A lot a employees leaked document or issues to me. I raised publicly a lot of big issues. I told them in order to protect your identify, I would gladly go to jail indefinitely before I would give up you name. You need a really sexy issue to get the public's attention...something really controversial.
The largest whistleblower issue I ever singerly instigated...it was American Tissue and  it involved $500 million dollars. Put a lot of bad guys in jail. I am afraid of nothing (except my wife).
I talked to Dave this morning. He was a really nice guy.  We talked for an hour or so...he would have let me talked longer if I wanted too.
He says the vibrations are normal. They basically stand up on the deck during an inspection...if it doesn’t sway or vibrate noticeable it gets passed. I basically said vibrations are an indicator of bridge deterioration.  I am one for science...I need a detector measuring and recording vibration for a prolonged period of time. Then you monitor the vibration trends. He basically said there are no state and federal requirements with vibrations or movement requirements. I’d like to see them do a vibration test once a year.
So what is the science and engineering that guides the NHDOT into making a judgment about the strength of a totally 1921 rusted gusset? They would remove old rusted gussets,  then measure the forces it would take to when a gusset fails. Right, an assortment of rusted gusset, maybe even intentionally corroded, maybe rusted 10%, 20% or 50%, whatever, rusted in a assortment of areas (top)...where we got the data, science and engineering knowledge to be assured we know "when" a rusted gusset would fail.
Check out the vertical member...there are holes that are just corroded through the iron beam. Look at the rivet heads...you got to know a lot less force than when new would pop those rivets  So we see a diagonal and vertical rusted member attached to the gusset...along with the vertical outside member...with all that rust, how do we really know the real force it would take to fail these connecting members?
 Basically they are washing away the uncertainty(not disclosing) on these degraded areas...while unjustly amplifying the certainty (the wasted away top doesn't matter) with the gusset's structural integrity.
  Got any independent academic reports or government studies...destructive testing... on the integrity of rusted gussets like this? When an old rust gusset will fail?
We talked about my grossly corroded gusset...he says it mostly on the top. It hasn’t much degraded the strength of gusset. They are working on getting a sonic metal detector to inspect the gussets with heavy rust. I asked him according the Minneapolis NTSB findings on their bridge collapse...did you carry out the required gusset inspections. He said they did!

Come on, that horizontal runner under the gusset...from footing to footing all across the bridge..with all that debris and dirt covering up the member, how strong is that member? Right, that dirt or debris says wet for a long time, along with the salt...you know that is a intensely corroded area. 
Don't get you panties wet...I took these picture in the spring...

They are still in the 19th century paperwork world...all their paperwork isn’t digitized yet.

I told Dave the NHDOT is as much a victim to our dysfunctional political process as Hinsdale NH...
...I decided  to bug the NHDOT about bridge movement, sway and vibration today. I always had issues in any NHDOT agency getting to talk to the right person. Once you say I got a problem, then all you get is everyone is out of the office.

I called the district 4 people asking to talk about the Hinsdale Bridge vibration problems. She said nobody is in right now, can I take you name and number? I say irked, I leave my name and number, then nobody ever gets back to me. There is a pause; she then says maybe you need to speak to Mark Richardson over in bridge inspection and she gives me the number. I call up the number for inspections,  but bridge new construction office answers. I give him my spiel, he says the bridge inspection office is not available...we are just answering their phones. I go into irked, I always have so much trouble getting to talk to the right people in any NH agency.  He says are budgets are tight, bridge inspection only has one secretary, and she is out. So we got into a little conversation about the NHDOT. Anyways Mark is not around, you can call him in the morning...but the real guy to talk to is Dave Powelson.
This is a message I got out of him: “Many years ago when I first got here we had about 120 employees. We have now around 70 employees. He says they perform an inadequate amount of inspection on new bridge construction...we are so overloaded and overwhelmed we can’t adequately vet the designs and oversee even the construction of new bridge. Many things are getting passed us.
This is the “ New Hampshire Advantage”...

Friday, June 13, 2014

Grand Gulf is Going bonkers on us?

Welcome Grand Gulf to the world of Pilgrim and Palisades...didn't they have a power uprate of late?

Huge plant: Grand Gulf's reactor is the most powerful in the United States, with a core power of 4408 MWth[1] yielding a nominal gross electrical output of about 1500 MWe.

Grand Gulf Station, a supplemental inspection team is being chartered - White PI for Unplanned Scrams per 7000 Critical Hours

by Bob Meyer

June 12, 2014, The NRC Director's office sent out a memorandum to Jim Drake, Senior Reactor Inspector, Plant Support Branch 2, Division of Reactor Safety designating him as the team leader for the Supplemental Inspection Team.

Since December 29, 2012 to March 29, 2014, the station experienced six unplanned scrams.
As a result of the licensee experiencing three unplanned scrams between December 29, 2012, and January 14, 2013, the Performance Indicator for “Unplanned Scrams per 7000 Critical Hours,” crossed the threshold into White. The following are the descriptions of each of these scrams:

December 29, 2012 - Scram from 100% due to phase A unit differential signal resulting in a main generator lockout and turbine trip

January 4, 2013 - Scram from 94% power due to a phase A unit differential signal resulting in a main generator/turbine trip. Returned to 100% power on January 11

January 14, 2013 - Scram from 100% power due to a turbine generator trip caused by a generator neutral time overcurrent relay tripping. Commenced startup activities on January 27

The licensee had originally indicated that they were prepared for the IP 95001, “Supplemental Inspection for One or Two White Inputs in a Strategic Performance Area,” to be performed in August 2013. However, the licensee experienced another reactor scram (below), which resulted in their request to delay the inspection while they evaluated this new event against the planned actions that they had developed for the previous events.

July 30, 2013 - Scram from 100% power due to high reactor pressure. Cause was a failure of the B turbine stress evaluator (TSE) transmitter

On February 28, 2014, the licensee notified the NRC that they were ready for the IP 95001 inspection.

Subsequently, the licensee experienced two more reactor scrams.

March 17, 2014 - Operators inserted a manual scram from 41 percent thermal power due to a steam leak in the turbine building

March 29, 2014 - Scram from 87% power due to a main generator load reject, resulting in a turbine control valve fast closure

As a result, the licensee contracted an outside firm to perform an independent evaluation of these events and the licensee’s proposed corrective actions.

This supplemental inspection is being performed to obtain a better understanding of each of the referenced events; to assess the licensee’s understanding and response; and to assess whether all underlying contributing causes were appropriately considered and evaluated in the development of the licensee’s corrective actions.