MSP Citizens Response
Reports (POL) <citizensresponsereports@MassMail.State.MA.US>
To:Michael Mulligan
Feb 24, 2017 at
9:03 AM
We are in receipt of your citizen response
report. A complaint intake officer will contact you within the next few
days to discuss your concerns. Thank you.
Feb 24, 2017 at 2:16 PM
I really appreciate your quick response. Call anytime.
Home: 1-603-336-8320
Cell: 1-603-209-4206
Mike
·
Michael
Mulligan <steamshovel2002@yahoo.com>
To:Michael Mulligan
Mar 22 at 7:34 AM
Dear Sir,
Could you reevaluate my complaint about illegal stops on I 91
Holyoke Ma. In light of mass corruption of the state police and the burgeoning
"Accident
and Injury Reduction Effort patrols, known as AIRE patrols" corruption....was
my stop part of the AIRE corruption? Was the MSP Citizen Response Report
involved in a cover up with my complaint? If your agency thoroughly
investigated my complaint, would the state police have discover their
corruption earlier? I'd put a picture of my ticket on my blog article.
"Massachusetts State Police In illegal Alien or Terrorism
Alert On I-91?"
Please send this to the highest state police official who is
involved with the corruption investigation.
I am in contact with the Boston Globe.
Mike Mulligan
Hinsdale, NH
16033368320
State police have asked Attorney General Maura Healey’s office to help them investigate no-show assignments in which troopers were paid but failed to report for duty, state police said.
“An internal State Police audit of AIRE (Accident Injury Reduction Effort) patrol shifts assigned to officers within Troop E found evidence that shifts assigned were not always worked and that troopers were still paid despite not having shown up for their shift,” state police wrote.
http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2018/03/21/after-scandals-state-police-need-restore-accountability-legal-specialists-say/IvCWSfwvAfvseuKAFWAZYK/story.html
Massachusetts State Police In illegal Alien or Terrorism Alert On I-91?
John Tlumacki/Globe staff
Massachusetts State Police Colonel Kerry Gilpin addressed
the media Tuesday at the State Police Headquarters concerning an investigation
into State Police overtime.
Get
immediate alerts on all breaking news, delivered via Facebook Messenger. Sign up here.
ADVERTISING
FRAMINGHAM
— In another black eye for the scandal-ridden Massachusetts State Police, 20
active troopers face potential sanctions for the apparent theft of overtime
pay, with the most egregious alleged offenders putting in for as many as 100
no-show shifts, officials said Tuesday.
In a
state agency where 245 troopers — about 12 percent of the force — made more
than $200,000 last year, an internal audit of Troop E, a division that covers
the Massachusetts Turnpike, found “apparent discrepancies between overtime paid
and actual patrols worked,” State Police Colonel Kerry A. Gilpin,
superintendent of the force, said at a morning news conference.
Nineteen
troopers face internal duty status hearings in the coming days to determine
whether they’ll be suspended, Gilpin said. Another trooper who was already
suspended for another matter and a retiree are also being investigated.
Gilpin
said that she couldn’t put a dollar figure on the amount of disputed overtime,
but that the number of questionable overtime shifts per trooper ranged from one
to “as high as 100.”
State
Police officials said they have reported their findings, which stemmed from an
investigation launched last fall, to Attorney General Maura Healey’s office for
review and potential prosecution.
Coming on
the heels of several other high-profile controversies in recent months, news of
the purported overtime scheme quickly stirred outrage.
Governor
Charlie Baker, who appointed Gilpin to head the agency last November, said the
superintendent “made a pretty clear statement that this sort of activity and
this sort of behavior is not going to be tolerated.”
Baker
said that overall the State Police are “a strong, good, well-trained unit.”
“But
clearly there’s some people here who broke the rules, allegedly, and got way
beyond the bounds of what anyone would consider to be appropriate behavior,”
Baker said. “And for those who are found to have committed what’s been alleged,
they should face the music.”
The
department’s previous superintendent, Richard McKeon, and his deputy, Francis
Hughes, retired in November after revelations that McKeon had ordered an arrest
report changed to remove embarrassing information about the daughter of Judge
Timothy Bibaud. A lawyer for McKeon has said he ordered the deletions to remove
unnecessary information.
Baker and
Healey have each announced investigations into the handling of the police
reports.
Two more
high-ranking officials linked to the redactions – Lieutenant Colonel Daniel
Risteen and Major Susan Anderson — retired suddenly in February. Their
retirements came a day after the Globe reported that Trooper Leigha Genduso had
been hired despite having been a coconspirator in a 2007 drug case and having
avoided charges by testifying. Genduso, whom multiple sources said was
Risteen’s former girlfriend, was suspended after the disclosure.
On
Tuesday, the union that represents troopers, the State Police Association of
Massachusetts, said it does not condone any actions that may have violated the
public’s trust.
“The
department has been in turmoil over the last several months,” Dana Pullman,
president of the union, said in a statement. “We believe the customs and
culture that was allowed to flourish under the previous state police leadership
has compromised the public’s perception and calls into question the integrity
of the hard-working men and women of the Massachusetts State Police. Colonel
Gilpin has been given the unenviable task of dealing with a myriad of untenable
issues.”…