Suspicious Navy Activity

Update 1031am

Shortly after I posted this in my blog, my comment popped back up on the comment section where it should be. The evidence is piling up I was involved in the firing the admiral.   


So Swift is Acorns boss. I am still trying to figure out who is who. 

I submitted this last night to the Navy Institute and they removed it. I was wondering if I would take out the Seventh Fleet boss (Acorn). And then it happened. 

The facts are; the Navy said there was steering failure, then they ruled it out, now it is still on the table. They tell us these quick phrases without any explanation. There are testing the waters to see if it sticks. 

Honestly, a sailor could open up a breaker or pull a wire, the crash occurs, then restore everything. There would be no evidence on what happened.   

Navy Institute: "All right, so Navy won’t release investigation information until all the reports are in based on not poising the well, until everyone gets their story straight. What would happen if a sailor leaked investigation information. It is the same thing. It is a Navy rule nobody releases investigation results prematurely until the full investigation is complete. It is a gross investigation impropriety.  When you are a fleet admiral, are you exempt from following Navy rules? Is he ordering investigators not to discover sabotage? If the investigation in not even begun, what does he base this comment on? Then right now, why doesn’t he fully explain why the steering failed? This is a fleet Admiral for Christ sake"

Can you even imagine how he and the Navy will look if the investigators eventually discovered sabotage?" 

Here is the comment I keyed on. 

Adm. Scott Swift, the commander of U.S. Pacific Fleet, said Tuesday.

“The unusual nature of the disasters even has prompted senior Navy leaders to rebut speculation that sabotage or a cyber attack may have caused the collisions. There is no indication that either occurred, Swift said again Tuesday.”

It wouldn't be the first time the Navy used accident investigations as a tool of a cover up?

I got tip a female berthing area was flooded. I can't validate if it true.

So they are removing Acorn who is scheduled to retire in a month. It is weak. It sounds like a Navy official who is taking a sword for the "Secretary of the Navy"? 

The Navy Institute has given me a lot of leeway with making comments. They should be commended. It was the first time they censored me. 

Remember the Navy has some heavy duty inducements to get a sailor or officer to lie for them. Give him a advancement, give him a immediate plum new duty station, change records, treat him special for the rest of his career. Outsiders would never be able to pick up this inducement.

This probably revolves around China saying the US Navy is a shipping hazard in the south China seas. Our competitors making hay with all the ship collision.