NRC Senate Political Hearing BS

This is a senate hearing I am talking about.

Say the issues around Markey’s state, the scam and LOOP in Pilgrim of this winter. 

Inform the commissioners we want to discuss the problems with the winter scram and LOOP. Be prepare to talk thoroughly about these issues and have your staff prepare you. Have the senior resident present the facts, then discuss with his boss and the regional boss in the hearing. Have the plant executive in charge explain what he’d seen. Maybe a on shift control room operator and shift supervisor explain how they seen the trip coming. Then a discussion with the commissioners on their perceptions.

Maybe a short list of question to discuss given to the NRC staff and the plant that need to answered months before the Senate hearing. 

But everyone in these congressional hearing would rather talk about these highly charged peripheral issue unrelated to actual plant operations,these politicians looking like they are actively engaged with the nuclear industry…but it is nothing but highly charged show senate and house hearings and oversight.

Actually, the congressional hearing are a shield from showing us the true conditions of the plants. It is the intent of congress to protect the nuclear industry, hide their misdeeds! 

It is the American nuclear village...  

April 12, 2015: NRC Senate Political Hearing BS

I get it now; the politicians would rather talk about Fukushima and seismic issues rather than the issues directly affecting the NRC and plants. Give me some more of that outdated budget procedure...

Like, what the hell is going on with all the problems with Calvert Cliffs, River Bend, Waterford and Pilgrim…why don’t we have a congressional hearing on these problematic plants. Just chose one and thoroughly discuss why it happened. Why not call in on scene inspectors, employees and executives? 

The politicians are sneakily using the seismic and Fukushima issues as a shield for the troublesome plants and current events.

That is why nobody wants to move on the Fukushima issues.it's great filler material of little concern...

Senator Sullivan asked a good question: what is the meaning of an independent Regulator.

He said basically, the president chooses nominees, the house and senate controls the agency.

The NY senator talking about global warming and evacuations, basically it is less painful and risky talking about these broad problem that nobody acts on than plant problems.

This is the hand the USA’s nuclear village…never directly talking about plant problems creating the most risk to the nuclear industry, the nation and the plant.

  

Even Senator Markey response is troubling, Fukushima, Fukushima, Fukushima…

I could cry, cyber security…nobody really interested on what the plants are doing?

Stealing US nuclear industry trade secret and china and Chinese access to US plants

This big facade of great so call issues of no meaning.

Some bs document request of no use, all a noisy useless facade..

Senator Carper…

26 new plants from 2001 and only four are in process now.

How to get good employees to the NRC?

Biggest problems, chairman

Fukushima

Licensing backlog coming from Fukushima

New reactors

Licensing oversight…notice this is last

Budget management directive out of date, just useless filler issues!

Senator Boxer again

Documents to Senate whining from San Onofre, god dam it, withhold their funding?

It is all a puppet show…

Senator Inhofe

Some Japanese official said if they had NRC mandated equipment prior to Fukushima the accident wouldn’t happen. 

Bet you the industry told the politicians here, you say anything directly about a US nuclear power plant will eat you alive.

A empty calorie show trial...