I think Entergy is getting worried about the public and NRC’s reputation of them with uncontrolled operational problems within their fleet...resources/money...so they are beginning to consolidate assets into their most viable nuclear plants...
Brattleboro Reformer:
BREAKING: Entergy to close, decommission Vermont Yankee
BRATTLEBORO -- Entergy Corporation,
the owners of Vermont Yankee Nuclear plant in Vernon, on Tuesday morning
announced plans to close and decommission the power station following its
current fuel cycle.
In a release Entergy stated the
decision was "driven by sustained low power prices, high cost structure
and wholesale electricity market design flaws for Vermont Yankee plant."
It added that Entergy's focus would
"remain on safety during remaining operation and after shutdown."
"This was an agonizing decision
and an extremely tough call for us," said Leo Denault, Entergy's chairman
and chief executive officer. "Vermont Yankee has an immensely talented,
dedicated and loyal workforce, and a solid base of support among many in the
community. We recognize that closing the plant on this schedule was not the
outcome they had hoped for, but we have reluctantly concluded that it is the
appropriate action for us to take under the circumstances."
The following is the rest of
Entergy's statement. We will have full coverage later later.
***
The decision to close Vermont Yankee
in 2014 was based on a number of financial factors, including:
A natural gas market that has
undergone a transformational shift in supply due to the impacts of shale gas,
resulting in sustained low natural gas prices and wholesale energy prices.
A high cost structure for this
single unit plant. Since 2002, the company has invested more than $400 million in the safe and reliable
operation of the facility. In addition, the financial impact of cumulative
regulation is especially challenging to a small plant in these market
conditions.
Wholesale market design flaws that
continue to result in artificially low energy and capacity prices in the
region, and do not provide adequate compensation to merchant nuclear plants for
the fuel diversity benefits they provide.
Making the decision now and
operating through the fourth quarter of 2014 allows time to duly and properly
plan for a safe and orderly shutdown and prepare filings with the NRC regarding
shutdown and decommissioning. Entergy will establish a decommissioning planning
organization responsible for planning and executing the safe and efficient
decommissioning of the facility. Once the plant is shut down, workers will
de-fuel the reactor and place the plant into SAFSTOR, a process whereby a
nuclear facility is placed and maintained in a condition that allows it to be
safely secured, monitored and stored.
"We are committed to the safe
and reliable operation of Vermont Yankee until shutdown, followed by a safe,
orderly and environmentally responsible decommissioning process," Denault
said.
Commenting on the future of nuclear
power, Denault said: "Entergy remains committed to nuclear as an important
long-term component of its generating portfolio. Nuclear energy is safe,
reliable, carbon-free and contributes to supply diversity and energy security
as part of a balanced energy portfolio."
Financial Implications
Entergy plans to recognize an
after-tax impairment charge of approximately $181 million in the third quarter
of 2013 related to the decision to shut down the plant at the end of this
current operating cycle. In addition to this initial charge, Entergy expects to
recognize charges totaling approximately $55 to $60 million associated with
future severance and employee retention costs through the end of next year. These
charges will be classified as special items, and therefore, excluded from
operational results.
The company noted that the estimated
operational earnings contribution from Vermont Yankee was expected to be around
breakeven in 2013, and generally declining over the next few years. As a result
of this decision and based on continuing operations into fourth quarter 2014,
the estimated operational earnings change, excluding these special items, is
expected to be modestly accretive within two years after shutdown, and cash
flow is expected to increase approximately $150 to $200 million in total
through 2017, compared to Vermont Yankee's continued operation.
Regarding decommissioning, assuming
end of operations in fourth quarter 2014, the amount required to meet the NRC
minimum for decommissioning financial assurance for license termination is $566
million. The Vermont Yankee decommissioning trust had a balance of
approximately $582 million as of July 31, 2013, excluding the $40 million
guarantee by Entergy Corporation to satisfy NRC requirements following the 2009
review of financial assurance levels. Filings with the NRC for planned shutdown
activities will determine whether any other financial assurance may be required
and will specifically address funding for spent fuel management, which will be
required until the federal government takes possession of the fuel and removes
it from the site, per its current obligations.
Vermont Yankee, a single unit
boiling water reactor, began commercial operation in 1972. Entergy acquired the
plant from Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation in 2002. In March 2011, the
NRC renewed the station's operating license for an additional 20 years, until
2032.
Additional information regarding
today's announcement is available in the Frequently Asked Questions section of
www.entergy.com.
Entergy Corporation, which
celebrates its 100th birthday this year, is an integrated energy company
engaged primarily in electric power production and retail distribution
operations. Entergy owns and operates power plants with approximately 30,000
megawatts of electric generating capacity, including more than 10,000 megawatts
of nuclear power, making it one of the nation's leading nuclear generators.
Entergy delivers electricity to 2.8 million utility customers in Arkansas,
Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas.
4 comments:
Mike Mulligan claims to have been fired by Entergy for being a whistle blower. But if Entergy had officially fired him for that. He would be a very rich man by now. MIKE WHAT WAS THE OFFICIAL REASON THAT ENTERGY FIRED YOU. please enlighten us all like you do when it comes to bad mouthing Entergy!
Tom,
Very few ever make big bucks out of whistleblowing in the nuclear industry. They paid congress off, as with the rest of the business…we are terribly at a mismatch.
Entergy never fired me!
There was a $50,000 deal for me to leave VY before Entergy owned it…
Back in the 1993 time frame...
I raised safety issues and was a whistleblower...
Mike so why the vendetta against Entergy? I still don't understand because Green Mountain Power could not call you in and tell you here's 50,000 dollars take it your fired because your a whistleblower. So what was the official reason they gave for firing you and then paying you off?
Post a Comment