Update 9/15/ 2016
(Brace)
Seems the problem is popping up again. I know allegations is going be looking at this. Is it going to take me contacting the NRC's Chairman in order to get region 1 to do your job professionally?
I am disgusted with the treatment of this problem. I can't believe there isn't a documented trail. It is as if you are habituated into making any old excuse to not document the sins of the department and Allegations.
I can't believe the bs excuses you threw at me:
1) its a IT problem and not anything to do with allegations, we don't have to document this.
2) its beyond stupid, using a NRC account within the NRC IT system to so call send test e-mails to validate yahoo e-mails continue to get received by the NRC. it just lazy!!! I had effectively summarized this article to everyone and nobody would accepted the facts as I know it. I have to go by facts and the Allegation department gets to make half ass assumptions to delegitimized a concerned member of the public and I imagine nuclear industry employees.
It's 12/12/12 all over again...
Mike Mulligan 9/15/26
Originally posted on 12/12/12 beginning here.
The NRC promised to talk to me about this...they called me once when I wasn't home. Nobody has talked to me yet. So you get it, the agency tries to contact you at a inoperative time, they give you a bum number, they don't have the courtesy to notified by email of the time of the call...I guess they give you one shot to talk about an event and that is it.
I got no "easy" transparency on my first shot at this contacting the agency...I just knew how to manipulate the agency by playing one level of the agency against the other. they were trying to blow me off! Easy and persistent contact to resolve a problem is the enabler of transparency...and the agency has to hold themselves scrutinizable to the quality of their communications.
The deal I was going to talk to a highly specialist...not a generalist who sees the big picture. He'd tell me the worthless technical details... but no chance of knowing the big picture and the power to change what is wrong. This technical specialist would be amazing in he area...but a absolute idiot with seeing the big picture and the skills to impose changes.
Get our discussion transcripted...that is all i want.
US regulator: Transparency is key Fukushima lessonThe Associated Press
TOKYO -- A top U.S. nuclear regulator says one of key lessons learned from Fukushima's disaster is the importance of a strong and independent operator that is transparent.
How often does allegation's blow off peoples concerns without merit and then state gross inaccuracies without due diligence? I guess he is technically correct, but they do block globally peoples emails.
Mr. Mulligan,We are pleased to inform you that the NRC does not block any individual e-mails coming to the NRC.Should you have a safety or security concern that may impact the safety and security of the public and the environment, please report to the NRC.Thank you,
Originally post on 12/4/2012...
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Webber, Robert <Robert.Webber@nrc.gov> wrote:
Mr. Mulligan:Good morning. Chairman Macfarlane’s office asked that I contact you concerning your inability to send emails to NRC staff. Please accept my apology for the difficulties you have encountered. We have seen an increase in spam and other unwanted emails originating from IP addresses registered and belonging to Yahoo! We use a product, Cisco Ironport, to detect and block spam. As a result, incoming email traffic from the Yahoo address is “throttled” by Cisco and is denied by our firewall from reaching its destination. Cisco has been communicating on our behalf with appropriate contacts at Yahoo! regarding their outbound mail issue and have been assuring us that they’re working on it. We will continue to work with Cisco and Yahoo in an effort to help them resolve this issue.Please contact me at....... should you wish to discuss this matter further.Bob Webber, DirectorInfrastructure and Computer Operations DivisionOffice of Information Services
Dec 6 @5:30pm: I e-mailed the NRC chairman yesterday...really her staff....she had somebody call me named Jack L from region 1. My 90 year old mother in law took the message...it got a little garbled. I am at my house right now?
What drive me crazy is the NRC won't help me understand why I am getting these Yahoo Daemon bounces with my emails. You notice how I am beginning to use the the Google mail account. Should have changed over years ago.
Ultimately, if the NRC took it seriously there would have to be a public notification. We are having spam issue from Yahoo...we had to create a filter to not overwhelm our system. That is why you are getting a yahoo DEAMON warning that the NRC is rejecting your emails.
Spam reputation hinders Yahoo mail delivery
Monday, November 14, 2011Sean O'Malley
Some yahoo.com e-mail users don't have much to shout "Yahoo!" about these days.
According to Don Hone, an e-mail administrator for OIT, Yahoo's spam reputation has fallen to the point where messages are being consistently rejected by other providers, including Ohio University. Attempts to contact administrators at Yahoo have so far been unsuccessful.
"At this point," Hone says, "Yahoo users who need to send e-mail to OHIO students or employees may want to consider moving to a different e-mail provider."
Like many institutions across the country, Ohio University uses reputation-based filtering as part of its defense against spam. In the automated spam filtering world, "bad reputation" has a very specific meaning. When a company, Internet provider, or institution sends too much spam from a particular server, that server gets points taken away from its reputation. If a server's reputation drops too low, that server gets blacklisted. According to Hone, approximately half of Yahoo's e-mail servers currently are experiencing some sort of spam-related restriction.
Students and employees who are forwarding their accounts to Yahoo may wish to consider disabling that forwarding and using their university account instead. Although messages forwarded from OHIO to Yahoo will get through, replies from Yahoo to OHIO may be delayed or blocked.
Symptoms and cures for Yahoo users
The most common symptom of spam trouble for a Yahoo user trying to reach an OHIO address is a rejection message. For e-mails sent from Yahoo to OHIO, the rejection notice will have the following characteristics:- From: MAILER-DAEMON@yahoo.com
- Subject: Failure Notice
- Reason: "Too many recipients received this hour"
- disabling forwarding and using Catmail or Exchange
- opening a new account with a different e-mail provider and updating OHIO forwarding to point to that new account
- continuing to read mail on Yahoo, but using Catmail or Exchange when sending to OHIO users
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Mike Mulligan <steamshovel2002@gmail.com> wrote:
About a hour ago I called the NRC hotline about this mailer- daemon problem...wondering why lots of my e-mails were getting rejected by the NRC. I always use yahoo mailer. Half go through and the others get rejected.
Is this the problem below?I wonder if I use google, and it works, we know what the problem is. My guess it is this. I pity the rest of the Yahoo mail users?I'd still like a phone call back verifying yahoo is the problem...Makes me wonder if I am blacklisted...not that paranoid yet.Mike MulliganHinsdale, NH
Spam reputation hinders Yahoo mail delivery
Monday, November 14, 2011
Sean O'Malley
Some yahoo.com e-mail users don't have much to shout "Yahoo!" about these days.
According to Don Hone, an e-mail administrator for OIT, Yahoo's spam reputation has fallen to the point where messages are being consistently rejected by other providers, including Ohio University. Attempts to contact administrators at Yahoo have so far been unsuccessful.
"At this point," Hone says, "Yahoo users who need to send e-mail to OHIO students or employees may want to consider moving to a different e-mail provider."
Like many institutions across the country, Ohio University uses reputation-based filtering as part of its defense against spam. In the automated spam filtering world, "bad reputation" has a very specific meaning. When a company, Internet provider, or institution sends too much spam from a particular server, that server gets points taken away from its reputation. If a server's reputation drops too low, that server gets blacklisted. According to Hone, approximately half of Yahoo's e-mail servers currently are experiencing some sort of spam-related restriction.
Students and employees who are forwarding their accounts to Yahoo may wish to consider disabling that forwarding and using their university account instead. Although messages forwarded from OHIO to Yahoo will get through, replies from Yahoo to OHIO may be delayed or blocked.
Symptoms and cures for Yahoo users
The most common symptom of spam trouble for a Yahoo user trying to reach an OHIO address is a rejection message. For e-mails sent from Yahoo to OHIO, the rejection notice will have the following characteristics:
OIT has communicated directly about this issue with students and employees who are forwarding their mail to Yahoo. Options outlined in that message include:
- From: MAILER-DAEMON@yahoo.com
- Subject: Failure Notice
- Reason: "Too many recipients received this hour"
- disabling forwarding and using Catmail or Exchange
- opening a new account with a different e-mail provider and updating OHIO forwarding to point to that new account
- continuing to read mail on Yahoo, but using Catmail or Exchange when sending to OHIO users
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:33 AM, NRC Allegation <NRC.Allegation@nrc.gov> wrote:
Mr. Mulligan,We are pleased to inform you that the NRC does not block any individual e-mails coming to the NRC.Should you have a safety or security concern that may impact the safety and security of the public and the environment, please report to the NRC.Thank you,
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Mike Mulligan <steamshovel2002@gmail.com> wrote:
Sir,1) Did you begin processing my Dec 2 VY 2.206 I sent to allegation...did you receive this email on Dec 2? I am just try to figure out what is wrong.
2) Do you believe the below "message expired for domain nrc.gov and host received too many recipients"?
Yahoo is telling me the nrc.gov received too many emails and thus my e-mail was rejected by the NRC....not seen by allegations.
I honestly thought it inconceivable the NRC could be filtering me or blacklisting me...anyone...but it can be looked like that with getting these Yahoo DAEMON rejection.
3) the intent of condition or cause question...is this happening to anyone else and why?
4) I have a fully functional virus scan program...Norton....I don't think it is a virus at my end but who knows.
5) Could this be coming from the gov servers and outside the NRC...but still filtering me not intentionally. But too much yahoo spam?
6) It just looks like a some gov server is unintentionally filtering me or it being overloaded by yahoo scam.
Thank you for the response.Mike
From: "MAILER-DAEMON@yahoo.com" <MAILER-DAEMON@yahoo.com>
To: steamshovel2002@yahoo.com
Sent: Monday, December 3, 2012 5:06 PM
Subject: Failure Notice
Sorry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address.
<allegation@nrc.gov>:
Message expired for domain nrc.gov. Remote host said: 452 Too many recipients received this hour [RCPT_TO]
--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
Received: from [98.137.12.191] by nm25.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Dec 2012 21:44:31 -0000
Received: from [98.137.12.242] by tm12.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Dec 2012 21:44:31 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1050.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Dec 2012 21:44:31 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 713054.54237.bm@omp1050.mail.gq1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 18565 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Dec 2012 21:44:31 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1354484671; bh=pSp9GMEqYhi6KLLL1MeHk8RuvkdBIw WD/YGwfjLWiDk=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X- Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer: Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To: Subject:To:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=oaWo4YBK6IY52dRfX+ ZftEsWr6ypQKSCNkaqiuN1oKn/ GtYLRm9IxKmkh/ 8jcdkvsj1KGxjyL3dRoTHp2jLaZYtZ uFS9R9J3P4TvQsLw4RnAbzeEON7C0m bjcz8Lj/ 7y0JLclBYeY1RPFfu0EDNPgv7/ pWkjAAuag/Q0DGvThtM=
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer: Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To: Subject:To:MIME-Version: Content-Type;
b=IkfntdpPL6pUFz7cQRBtKYL9I390N2 lYMLmI/ 5Eq4n9Jr8p0PS3aA7tXTcWvgW+ tzPsfcgNCtEXqNu9FHyTyfsraBo/ wKKpf0jXwcg8up44HF2TxHzf8lG4Ct PlE5iav2gQdcYlPAuqlJaphYdvNj87 cxqeLRBy48wJcYvcTHnw=;
X-YMail-OSG: M8nIQhsVM1mbUMXMEE.48zMxAK6pUkwZJiDtMk6Hx9iI5gE
5Rg6wTuWdxKPVuSYvmNEUv9variCX9d1he2t_SS6kC_w.GKLDf8dIx_IX5Eh
sO_9ykWJJNolz3a.2BGEmGbnfE_Iv23wq8TezNMXGwiSnwhlIDaIwHCAW ARO
Ia13nOJ64bCxhPZymXaP7rVdB9fUThvS_BIbeMo10rHbz3QFBrgV.igq6NKh
h6EcTK6FP9Me9F1tkNbwLN_opOotjVIvQe1gyuKizr0FvdJuIeDmh dzQlAK2
jzf2hpGHdBdSppXQrnkif0m6eXax6MANce0rKQWYOQGighTp5vxhNOp_79y1
IuTRug6rD1joFMOLJ45GqhJAC_trdllRsoVzxs469lsCqRzWtBN3yPmg IkrK
vB6HEQW2.JWWwrnTK5o3BJhHygHAOkY1yYrQTEm Or8ghy77ea_ljkwUJz2v8
agVHqr1Ye3x3FKHlRk3XKmfLD0xKpqL7twO1B4NhB8rZ9RhLQNFXBv6J9G0n
gYMityV2P
Received: from [24.147.38.142] by web163904.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 13:44:31 PST
X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 001.001,RGVjIDIsIDIwMTIKClIuIFdpbGxpYW 0gQm9yY2hhcmR0CkV4ZWN1dGl2ZSBE aXJlY3RvciBmb3IgT3BlcmF0aW9ucw pVUyBOdWNsZWFyIFJlZ3VsYXRvcnkg Q29tbWlzc2lvbgpXYXNoaW5ndG9uLC BEQyAyMDU1NS0wMDAxCuOAgApEZWFy IE1yLiBCb3JjaGFyZHQsCsKgClJlcX Vlc3QgYW4gaW1tZWRpYXRlIHNodXRk b3duIG9mIFZZIGJlY2F1c2UgdGhlIE 5SQyBhbmQgRW50ZXJneSBjYW4ndCBr ZWVwCnRoZWlyIG51Y2xlYXIgc2FmZX R5IHBhcGVyd29yayBhbmQgZG9jdW1l bnRzIGFjY3VyYXRlIGFuZCB1cCABMA EBAQE-
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.128.478
Message-ID: <1354484671.18147.YahooMailNeo@web163904.mail. gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 13:44:31 -0800 (PST)
From: Michael Mulligan <steamshovel2002@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: Michael Mulligan <steamshovel2002@yahoo.com>
Subject: Vermont Yankee 2.206: Inaccurate And Incomplete Documents And LERs
To: "allegation@nrc.gov" <allegation@nrc.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="951228646-31788744-1354484671=:18147"
--951228646-31788744-1354484671=:18147
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="951228646-990194195-1354484671=:18147"
--951228646-990194195-1354484671=:18147
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dec 2, 2012=0A=0AR. William Borchardt=0AExecutive Director for Operations=
=0AUS Nuclear Regulatory Commission=0AWashington, DC 20555-0001=0A=E3=80=80=
=0ADear Mr. Borchardt,=0A=C2=A0=0ARequest an immediate shutdown of VY becau=
se the NRC and Entergy can't keep=0Atheir nuclear safety paperwork and docu=
ments accurate and up to date. I wonder=0Ahow that fits into risk informed =
regulations? =0A=C2=A0So here below is how VY's=0ASRV degraded thread seal =
LER 2010-002-01 dated March 1, 2011 expresses the=0A"cause of the event".=
=0A=C2=A0"Material testing determined that=0Athe apparent cause of the thre=
ad seal condition was thermal degradation. The=0Achange to use Buna-N mater=
ial in the new style seal resulted
No comments:
Post a Comment