Honestly, is this really military honor. The ethos of we never leave a brother behind. The NYT's has a big spread on deaths of the sailors...most of them came from immigrant communities. They are basically foreign slaves because good American kids aren't that patriotic today enough to join the Navy. They are basically working immigrant slaves in the military. Is it survival of the fittest against the immigrant Navy sailors and good American sailors thousands of miles away from the USA, in the of dark night and the collision of two ocean vessels . It has always been the elites against lower class in the Navy. Do you close the hatch behind a flooding compartment to save the ship or do you never leave your brother behind in a flooding compartment even if it causes you to lose the ship. You got to know somebody ordered the hatch closed knowing sailors could be alive in the compartment. You got to wonder if the guy making the order was thinking, well, most of them are immigrant anyways? So lets save the ship by closing the hatch. They could have continued working on getting everyone out alive and no bodies behind, or prepare the sailors to abandoned the ship and continue the operation to save lives and bring out the dead. Being next to Japan, there would have been a flotilla of aircraft and ships heading to the collision area in order to pick up the sailors floating in the seas if it came to that.
We are in era of fake heroism. The bankrupt forth estate is run by nothing but corporate right wing fanatics. This is a classic propaganda ploy by the admirals and administrative deep state to pump up fake heroism, protect the military industrial complex and politicians.You know they charged their administrative aids to juice up whatever heroism and altruism stories you can find about the collision. We want to flood the media with heroism stories in the opening stages of the catastrophe with preventable deaths. This sets the fundamental historic story of the event in a concrete foundation of altruism at sea. This is how we always successfully protected ourselves. The Navy is really good at this.
Do you remember the condition of our Navy in the second half of the Vietnam war. Ship sabotage by demoralized sailors were rampant. Race riots abounded on many ships. There was tremendous preventable fires and explosions on aircraft carriers. All sorts of stupid accidents and fires everywhere. Maintenance on ships was horrific and ship safety took a back seat to meeting the goals of our war. Are we in that condition today, but it is hidden from us. Is it more altruistic to crush your adversary as quickly possible using the full force of a nation's capabilities. To be as brutal as one can imagine. Get the dirty job done as quick as possible. Or drag out a war for years and decades where most of your troops are demoralized. You fight a long term was on the cheep. You hollow out your military forces with a extraordinary military tempo for decades. Right in WWII, we crushed our enemies as fast as we could. Then we rebuilt countries into Japan and Germany of today. Is it really moral and
Update 6/20
Does this indicate the North Koreans did it?
They say the ship bridge might not be manned during this. What a perfect opportunity to take over the ship.Donald J. TrumpVerified account @realDonaldTrump 24 minutes ago"While I greatly appreciate the efforts of President Xi & China to help with North Korea, it has not worked out. At least I know China tried!
Seems North Korea is preparing for nuclear explosion. Was the Fitzgerald a North Korean intimidation project. When we detonate our bomb, if a USA retaliatory response...this is the example of our terrorism plague.
There seems to be a lot of organize terrorism events showing up in a short period of time coming from different entities. Iran, ISIS and North Korea among other. Now for us, death by thousands of terrorism paper cuts. What if effectively Iran, North Korea, ISIS declared war on us. Terrorism that creates massive chaos, but not enough for the US to go full scale war. A war or skirmish that illuminates our political weakness? Can you even imagine the chaos in the White House with this. Stock markets would crash world wide. You think this might discover more financial problems during the 2008 crash. It's not any war would should fear, but the financial implosion aftermath. These bad actors must understand how politically vulnerable we at this point of time. It is a once in a lifetime opportunity to permanently damage the USA. If war strikes, is the terrorism in Europe a bad actor plan to strip Europe for the American umbellar. Will Europe become a neutral player? I think our bad actors are setting up a big play...
Update: This now should be a full national security investigation. Was the Fitz a target of opportunity or was the operation carefully planned and coordinated. The Japanese are saying the container ship captain is being investigated for professional negligence.
This guy from a on board sailor's mother letter says the container ship turned off it GPS tracking and all of its outside lights. He thinks its a North Korean operation as the Fitz was doing surveillance around North Korea. I am skeptical.
What to make of this: (AFP) — Saudi Arabia said on Monday that it captured three Iranian Revolutionary Guards aboard an explosive-laden boat heading to an oil platform in the Gulf, further ratcheting up tensions in the region.
...It looks like the container ship was aiming directly for the bridge. It T-boned our ship right in the middle of our ship at ninety degree angle. The container ship went spearfishing for a US Navy ship.
You would think if this was a accident, the ships would have hit at a glancing blow, hit the US Fitzgerald in the forward or after quarter. If this was a accident, eventually either bridge would see each other, attempt to turn away from each other, but to late. That would get you to hit in the aft or forward quarter at a glancing blow. Honestly, it was a honey shoot for a torpedo hitting amidships and directly aimed at the bridge.
Hmm, our Navy Seals just went into a Philippine town held by the ISIS. They wanted us to clear out the terrorist. Remember, the Philippine president was recently bad mouthing us. ISIS is mowing down people in cars, trucks and vans. Is it a reach saying a ISIS sympathizer intentionally drove the container ship to the Fitz as a terrorist attack...getting even? Was the container ship hunting the Fitz?
No comments:
Post a Comment